Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 

On testing Lindholm at center, a bigger role for Bennett, and more

September 13, 2019, 11:00 AM ET [60 Comments]
Todd Cordell
Calgary Flames Blogger • RSSArchiveCONTACT
Follow me on Twitter @ToddCordell

Training camps are in the process of opening up league-wide and preseason games are soon to follow.

With that in mind, TSN’s Bob McKenzie tweeted some tidbits on some storylines, and potential line combinations/pairings, to watch for in the coming days.

McKenzie’s info focused on Canadian teams, with the Calgary Flames obviously part of that group.

Tweet 1 (I didn’t embed because both tweets I’ll share were attached to an Oilers note):

Potential RFA absences for Tkachuk and Mangiapane create some havoc for CGY. Gaudreau-Monahan is a fixture and Lindholm could resume his role there but there’s been some talk, if Tkachuk and Mangiapane sign, Lindholm may get some time as a centre.


Though I expect Lindholm to (mostly) stick on the wing, I’m not surprised he is going to get a chance to play down the middle. Sean Monahan is a one-way center who goes MIA for a couple long stretches every season and you don’t want to take Mikael Backlund out of the shutdown role. That leaves the Flames in a tough spot when Monahan inevitably hits a wall, which is almost certainly why GM Brad Treliving tried to acquire Nazem Kadri this summer. He wanted insurance capable of playing top-6 minutes when needed. I think that’s what the Lindholm experiment is about.

If Lindholm can excel at center – he has some experience from his tenure with Carolina – it’s another option for Bill Peters to put in his back pocket.

Tweet 2:

Bennett could be a swing man who fills holes on either of the first or second lines in the early going. Sounds like Lucic and Ryan could be two-thirds of a third line and expect a growing role for youngsters Dube and (if he signs) Mangiapane.


I have no problem with Bennett serving in that role should he earn it in preseason. He plays with a lot of bite and is en elite chance generator. If his time working on finishing with Darryl Belfry actually makes a difference, and he starts converting on more of his looks, getting some top-6 reps could be warranted.

If Bennett is the same guy we’ve grown accustomed to seeing – the one who produced 5v5 points at a lesser rate than Carter Rowney, Scott Laughton, and Zack Kassian from 2016-19 – I’d rather stack the top line and trot out Michael Frolik on L2.

With regards to Lucic, he does still bring value defensively. Unfortunately, he is a black hole offensively. I think the best way to use Lucic would be primarily on the 4th line, with him perhaps getting some reps in the top-9 while defending leads late in games. I just don’t see enough offense to play on the 3rd line full-time. The Flames are going to give him every opportunity to play a meaningful role, though.

Andrew Mangiapane, Dillon Dube, or whoever ends up being the 3rd wheel on L3 is going to have to do a lot of the heavy lifting in terms of driving play up ice and facilitating in the final third.

Recent posts:

Flames double down on mistake, bring back Michael Stone

On Matthew Tkachuk’s next contract and Sam Bennett’s finishing

Three experiments the Flames should try during preseason play

Flames 2019-20 fantasy projections

Flames sign five players to professional tryouts

Who will win the Hart Trophy in 2019-20?

Who will win the Rocket Richard in 2019-20?

Who will win the Norris Trophy in 2019-20?

Three reasons to be optimistic about the Flames in 2019-20

Three Flames question marks heading into 2019-20
Join the Discussion: » 60 Comments » Post New Comment
More from Todd Cordell
» Three negatives from the Calgary Flames' 2020-21 campaign
» Three positives from the Calgary Flames' 2020-21 season
» Calgary Flames notes - May 19th
» Three things I'd like to see from the Calgary Flames down the stretch
» G52 Calgary Flames vs Ottawa Senators: Low-danger hockey