They are not throughout this thread........because he did NOT say what you claim.

Your interpretations of his statements are though.
- Doppleganger

You have terrible reading comprehension. Which grade are you in?

So in your world ONLY companies that agree with the Gay community and the progressive left's agenda should be allowed to operate in Boston.


That's what you call equality?

Think like me, and you can open your car wash.

Perhaps the mayor of Boston can identify the businesses in Boston that don't agree with his views by painting some sort of symbol on the doors of the establishments, like a blue triangle or an orange circle................and them people can choose to do business there or not.

Let's go one step further, maybe the owners of businesses that don't agree with the mayor of Boston should be forced to wear the symbol of their lapels too.
- Doppleganger

Oh my god... Are you serious? You really can't wrap your head around this, can you?




Do you support the KKK? Do you support women abusers?

Dan Cathy is the person who started this... The mayor of Boston is trying to prevent this hate group from entering his city. If you think he's a bad guy because of that, that's your opinion.

I know what you're saying (that hate groups should be treated equally) but it's seriously (frank)ed up. When you attack a group of innocent people (that means gay people and their supporters) you should lose certain rights... Just like criminals lose their rights to certain things.

Judging by your comments (and using an extreme example) do you think the courts are guilty of inequality when they sentence murderers and rapists? Maybe these people should be allowed to roam the streets... Who are we to decide that their actions/views are wrong?

Yay for ideologies!

Never wish more for a vomit emoticon.
- GuyLaDouche

Politics in general makes me want to vomit.

laughs brings much gay love

Politics in general makes me want to vomit.
- Jack-artist

your avatar freaks me out for some reason

laughs brings much gay love
- GuyLaDouche

Blacks, gays, females... I'm all for equality.

Plus, someones got to pick up for you.

Blacks, gays, females... I'm all for equality.
- laughs2907

Sheep? Your sisters?

Sheep? Your sisters?
- Lahey

Sheep? Definitely.

Sister #1? Fantastic human being.

Sister #2? A$$hole

I'm not American, so I don't particularly care. But from an outsiders pov, Clinton was really the only president in the last 30 or so years that has had a successful presidency IMO. Reagan, bush times two, all disasters. Obama isn't faring very well either, IMO. He's making every bit of the mess Bush did. Make no mistake though, George W Bush was a total disaster. He made such a mess of your country it could take twenty years to dig yourself out.

In terms of tax cuts and what not, for forty years the US had a steadily improving debt situation. Reagan and the first George Bush wiped out thirty of those forty years of progress. Clinton turned it around, only to have the second bush wipe out his progress, and the other ten years that were left.
- prock

Reagan defeated the Russians......an evil empire with Nukes.....probably the biggest threat to the free world(Hitler included)

Clinton gave the Koreans our nuclear secrets and was the first president ever to not get daily briefings from the CIA. The breakdown in intelligence directly lead to 9/11, even though it didn't happen on his watch. Teh economy was great, but that was more to do with private sector tech advances(Internet/Direct TV/etc) than with anything ANY politician could have done.

The 2nd Bush had some great ideas, but didn't get enough done....and he loved to spend, and Obama took that ball and freakin ran with it.

Reagan defeated the Russians......an evil empire with Nukes.....probably the biggest threat to the free world(Hitler included)

Clinton gave the Koreans our nuclear secrets and was the first president ever to not get daily briefings from the CIA. The breakdown in intelligence directly lead to 9/11, even though it didn't happen on his watch. Teh economy was great, but that was more to do with private sector tech advances(Internet/Direct TV/etc) than with anything ANY politician could have done.

The 2nd Bush had some great ideas, but didn't get enough done....and he loved to spend, and Obama took that ball and freakin ran with it.
- bruinsbeer69

like, Jello for lunch? A game of tag at recess, in the white house?

You really think Reagan defeated the Russians? That's crap. And seriously, I've never heard anything about Clinton giving nuclear secrets to the Koreans. That sounds like a pile of crap to me.

Once again you're assuming you know what news source I watch.

And once again you're wrong. (Surprise!!!!)

I don't watch a news source, I watch them all and seek out more POVs on radio and on the internet.

If you only follow one source of news, then you're only getting one POV and it could be heavily biased. You watch, listen and read a number of sources to get an idea of the truth, because nowadays the news sources have a distinctive "spin" top one degree or another.

Yes I watch FOX news, but I also watch CNN, MSNBC, Sun News, CBC, CTV and listen to various news/talkradio stations.

I also read the two Local newspapers everyday and on the Internet I read the Huffington Post, the Drudge report and these two sites
http://www.albawaba.com/en/
http://www.nytimes.com/
- Doppleganger

So what exactly about my post was false? Do you think that Fox isn't a legit. News source?

like, Jello for lunch? A game of tag at recess, in the white house?

You really think Reagan defeated the Russians? That's crap. And seriously, I've never heard anything about Clinton giving nuclear secrets to the Koreans. That sounds like a pile of crap to me.
- prock

http://archive.newsmax.co...es/2006/10/9/132140.shtml

We beat the Russians with money by running up the arms race. Their economy collapsed because of. That was all on Ronnie.

Sounds like a pile of fact to me

I LOVE the "I've never heard anything" argument. you could fill up the f@cking Grand Canyon with sh1t you've never heard of....so I guess it didn't happen that way, right, since YOU didn't hear about it.

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/10/9/132140.shtml

We beat the Russians with money by running up the arms race. Their economy collapsed because of. That was all on Ronnie.

Sounds like a pile of fact to me

I LOVE the "I've never heard anything" argument. you could fill up the f@cking Grand Canyon with sh1t you've never heard of....so I guess it didn't happen that way, right, since YOU didn't hear about it.
- bruinsbeer69

Uhh, I never said that. Typical right wing arrogant retort, making crap up along the way, just like usual.

Just like your claim that Clinton sold them "their nuclear secrets". The article you quote doesn't say anything remotely close to that.

Typical rightwing crap.

Oh my god... Are you serious? You really can't wrap your head around this, can you?




Do you support the KKK? Do you support women abusers?

Dan Cathy is the person who started this... The mayor of Boston is trying to prevent this hate group from entering his city. If you think he's a bad guy because of that, that's your opinion.

I know what you're saying (that hate groups should be treated equally) but it's seriously (frank)ed up. When you attack a group of innocent people (that means gay people and their supporters) you should lose certain rights... Just like criminals lose their rights to certain things.

Judging by your comments (and using an extreme example) do you think the courts are guilty of inequality when they sentence murderers and rapists? Maybe these people should be allowed to roam the streets... Who are we to decide that their actions/views are wrong?
- laughs2907

Wow, your mind is seriously warped.

Christians are now "hate groups" in your mind.


Now one was attacked.

Christians should have some of their "rights removed.

Christians are just like criminals.


I'm sure glad I don't live in a world controlled by you and those like-minded.

Reagan defeated the Russians......an evil empire with Nukes.....probably the biggest threat to the free world(Hitler included)

Clinton gave the Koreans our nuclear secrets and was the first president ever to not get daily briefings from the CIA. The breakdown in intelligence directly lead to 9/11, even though it didn't happen on his watch. Teh economy was great, but that was more to do with private sector tech advances(Internet/Direct TV/etc) than with anything ANY politician could have done.

The 2nd Bush had some great ideas, but didn't get enough done....and he loved to spend, and Obama took that ball and freakin ran with it.
- bruinsbeer69

Don't forget Clinton also had multiple opportunities to go after Bin Laden, but did not.

And most of Clinton's economic success was seen in his second term, and only came when the Republicans gained control of congress and Newt Gingrich brought in the Contract with America, and all that Clinton had to do was to sign it into law.

He was impeached too right?

So what exactly about my post was false? Do you think that Fox isn't a legit. News source?
- Feeling Glucky?

My point is one stop shopping for news is never good. I treat all sources equally.

However FOX news networks dominates the rating in the USA.

More get their "news" from Jon Stewart than CNN.

Uhh, I never said that. Typical right wing arrogant retort, making crap up along the way, just like usual.

Just like your claim that Clinton sold them "their nuclear secrets". The article you quote doesn't say anything remotely close to that.

Typical rightwing crap.
- prock

Whay are you putting words in his mouth?? Is this something all you left wing progressives do???

He said he GAVE them "their nuclear secrets"

yay ideologies!

its so fun that one president is less full of poop than another.

Wow, your mind is seriously warped.

Christians are now "hate groups" in your mind.


Now one was attacked.

Christians should have some of their "rights removed.

Christians are just like criminals.


I'm sure glad I don't live in a world controlled by you and those like-minded.
- Doppleganger

Talk about putting words in someone's mouth.

Yes, gays (and supporters of gays) were called arrogant and said they needed god's mercy. I consider that being attacked.

Chick Fil A should have certain rights removed for promoting inequality. I stand by that. Corporations face penalties and restrictions all of the time. If I were a mayor, I wouldn't want a company that stood for racism, sexism, or any other form of inequality in my city. Good for the mayor of Boston! (And before you misinterpret this (which you undoubtedly will) I'm not saying Chick Fil A is guilty of racism or sexism... Just supporting inequality).

I said "extreme example"... All Christians are not criminals (obviously)... You have to be smarter than this.

Dopps, you are arrogant, and I pray for god's mercy... Hopefully he/she will forgive you.

My point is one stop shopping for news is never good. I treat all sources equally.

However FOX news networks dominates the rating in the USA.

More get their "news" from Jon Stewart than CNN.
- Doppleganger

Why are you bringing up other news networks and Jon Stewart? I posted a screen shot of fox news saying you considered it a legitimate news source. Here's how you responded:

Once again you're assuming you know what news source I watch.

And once again you're wrong. (Surprise!!!!)

I don't watch a news source, I watch them all and seek out more POVs on radio and on the internet.

If you only follow one source of news, then you're only getting one POV and it could be heavily biased. You watch, listen and read a number of sources to get an idea of the truth, because nowadays the news sources have a distinctive "spin" top one degree or another.

Yes I watch FOX news, but I also watch CNN, MSNBC, Sun News, CBC, CTV and listen to various news/talkradio stations.

I also read the two Local newspapers everyday and on the Internet I read the Huffington Post, the Drudge report and these two sites
http://www.albawaba.com/en/
http://www.nytimes.com/

Do you not watch Fox news at all? Because that's what the bolded suggests.

Now, I posted this because of the numerous Fox news articles you've posted in the past, and your continued defense of the station(#1 in the US! woo!)

So which is it, am I assuming something incorrectly, as you pointed out, or are you a liar?

I'm just curious.

Talk about putting words in someone's mouth.

Yes, gays (and supporters of gays) were called arrogant and said they needed god's mercy. I consider that being attacked.

Chick Fil A should have certain rights removed for promoting inequality. I stand by that. Corporations face penalties and restrictions all of the time. If I were a mayor, I wouldn't want a company that stood for racism, sexism, or any other form of inequality in my city. Good for the mayor of Boston! (And before you misinterpret this (which you undoubtedly will) I'm not saying Chick Fil A is guilty of racism or sexism... Just supporting inequality).

I said "extreme example"... All Christians are not criminals (obviously)... You have to be smarter than this.

Dopps, you are arrogant, and I pray for god's mercy... Hopefully he/she will forgive you.
- laughs2907

He also put words in my mouth here:

I don't expect you to believe me, and assume you'll come up with some conspiracy theory like religion is a mask for gay bashing or something equally ridiculous.
- Doppleganger

Quite the hypocrite, eh?

And now there will undoubtedly be a response saying something like, "blah blah blah Chick Fil A isn't hurting anyone, and they're entitled to their opinions yadda yadda yadda yadda and they shouldn't be punished for stating their beliefs"...

To that I say, why must gay people (and gay supporters) be punished? Why must they be called arrogant (and you are (frank)ing blind or stupid if you can't realize they were being called arrogant by Dan Cathy) and why must they receive god's mercy? (once again, you are (frank)ing blind or stupid if you can't realize that Cathy was talking about gays and gay supporters here). Who are gay people hurting? Are you that arrogant to assume that your beliefs triumph every other person's belief? Are you that arrogant that you feel you have the right to tell someone else how to live their lives? Are you? Is this how your brain works? Do you realize how many religions/beliefs there are out there? Open your eyes.