NOAH_U
|
|
|
Location: Inside the Box Joined: 07.03.2010
|
|
|
right and crosby has never missed games due to injury, chundidilyum - HuileHab
When both were healthy, it shows Malkin was better. |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
So you make the excuse that Crosby was better than Malkin because Malkin had a bad knee....but you make no reference to Crosby's injuries? - yemrots
wtf? |
|
dt99999
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim Joined: 11.18.2008
|
|
|
That'll make sure no weeds grow under your laptop. - Dgrdnr
|
|
yemrots
|
|
|
Location: Leafs need a backup goalie more than a stud defenceman this year Joined: 03.04.2008
|
|
|
When both were healthy, it shows Malkin was better. - NOAH_U
No it doesn't. Not even close. |
|
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme Joined: 01.20.2009
|
|
|
right and crosby has never missed games due to injury, chundidilyum - HuileHab
NEVER.
But actually, I think both bring something different to the table.
Like Yzerman vs Fedorov if you will. |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
No it doesn't. Not even close. - yemrots
Wow. I was convinced by "no it doesn't". But then you solidified it with "not even close". Now I'm SUPER convinced. |
|
dt99999
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim Joined: 11.18.2008
|
|
|
NEVER.
But actually, I think both bring something different to the table.
Like Yzerman vs Fedorov if you will. - Pecafan Fan
yes. or like Eller and Darche. |
|
NOAH_U
|
|
|
Location: Inside the Box Joined: 07.03.2010
|
|
|
So you make the excuse that Crosby was better than Malkin because Malkin had a bad knee....but you make no reference to Crosby's injuries? - yemrots
'cause your friend already stated Malkin was only better than Crosby when Crosby isn't around. I show him same could be said for Crosby but there is a fact when both were Healthy, Malkin Showed he was better... Does everybody always have to explain it to you? |
|
HuileHab
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: I eat richards for breakfast! - stormey Joined: 03.01.2010
|
|
|
When both were healthy, it shows Malkin was better. - NOAH_U
Oh so you mean this year
06 -07 Malkin 78 gp 85points Corsby 79gp 120 points |
|
_nay_
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
That'll make sure no weeds grow under your laptop. - Dgrdnr
yessss
PS.
|
|
jaymster790
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Elsewhere, QC Joined: 03.16.2009
|
|
|
NEVER.
But actually, I think both bring something different to the table.
Like Yzerman vs Fedorov if you will. - Pecafan Fan
Purty good comparison right thur. |
|
jaymster790
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Elsewhere, QC Joined: 03.16.2009
|
|
|
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme Joined: 01.20.2009
|
|
|
Oh so you mean this year
06 -07 Malkin 78 gp 85points Corsby 79gp 120 points - HuileHab
Precisely.
|
|
Adam French
Atlanta Thrashers |
|
|
Location: Isn't Cooley 5"11? You know who else is 5"11? Sydney Crosby. - Scabeh Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
Sam Gagner is better than both of those poops. |
|
_nay_
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
yes. or like Eller and Darche. - dt99999
You just missed a golden opportunity. |
|
yemrots
|
|
|
Location: Leafs need a backup goalie more than a stud defenceman this year Joined: 03.04.2008
|
|
|
'cause your friend already stated Malkin was only better than Crosby when Crosby isn't around. I show him same could be said for Crosby but there is a fact when both were Healthy, Malkin Showed he was better... Does everybody always have to explain it to you? - NOAH_U
Somebody has to explain all your posts to me. |
|
Dgrdnr
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Newly appointed ambassador of the Nordiques thread Joined: 10.12.2009
|
|
|
yessss
PS.
- _nay_
m'eh, bonne bière, mais la place est vraiment mal organisée, le service est très mauvais et le proprio est un ostie de douche |
|
|
|
Somebody has to explain all your posts to me. - yemrots
|
|
Dgrdnr
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Newly appointed ambassador of the Nordiques thread Joined: 10.12.2009
|
|
|
Sam Gagner is better than both of those poops. - AdamFrench
Thank you longbottom. |
|
DoubleDown
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Not to point any fingers but Tyson Barrie has looked awful in the blue and white for the Leafs., QC Joined: 07.28.2006
|
|
|
|
|
hey guys - DoubleDown
|
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
hey guys - DoubleDown
Oh great. |
|
yemrots
|
|
|
Location: Leafs need a backup goalie more than a stud defenceman this year Joined: 03.04.2008
|
|
|
Wow. I was convinced by "no it doesn't". But then you solidified it with "not even close". Now I'm SUPER convinced. - hscesq
stormey has three more days yet. I'll bite my tongue. |
|
BingoLady
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Ultimate Warrior, NB Joined: 07.15.2009
|
|
|
'cause your friend already stated Malkin was only better than Crosby when Crosby isn't around. I show him same could be said for Crosby but there is a fact when both were Healthy, Malkin Showed he was better... Does everybody always have to explain it to you? - NOAH_U
This makes no sense |
|
DoubleDown
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Not to point any fingers but Tyson Barrie has looked awful in the blue and white for the Leafs., QC Joined: 07.28.2006
|
|
|
Wow. I was convinced by "no it doesn't". But then you solidified it with "not even close". Now I'm SUPER convinced. - hscesq
he has a masters in rhetoric |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113 Next |