BulliesPhan87
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: the lone wolf of hockeybuzz Joined: 07.31.2009
|
|
|
I know I sound stupid, but...why would they want to do that? - Dkos
Proceeding with anti-trust litigation is the so-called nuclear option, taking this battle to court. Right now, they're in the process of making that option available.
At least, that's how I understand it. |
|
jak521
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Buckle Up. Joined: 02.19.2008
|
|
|
Proceeding with anti-trust litigation is the so-called nuclear option, taking this battle to court. Right now, they're in the process of making that option available.
At least, that's how I understand it. - BulliesPhan87
No season? |
|
BulliesPhan87
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: the lone wolf of hockeybuzz Joined: 07.31.2009
|
|
|
No season? - jak521
We'll know very soon. Either we'll have a short season in 2013, or we'll have a very messy situation on our hands.
Well, in the mean time at least I'm not getting locked out at the Springfield Ice Rink (that is, unless I don't pay ) |
|
Dkos
Season Ticket Holder Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Gritty, PA Joined: 01.15.2007
|
|
|
Proceeding with anti-trust litigation is the so-called nuclear option, taking this battle to court. Right now, they're in the process of making that option available.
At least, that's how I understand it. - BulliesPhan87
My simplistic understanding of the lockout is this: the current contract is up and the season can't start until they have a new one, the players want a bigger piece of the pie than they got in the last agreement and the owners don't want to give it to them. They can't agree on anything. How does dissolving the Players Union get the players a better contract? Why would the owners owe the players anything if the Union is dissolved? |
|
ob18
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: That matters less than you hope it does Joined: 07.20.2007
|
|
|
BulliesPhan87
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: the lone wolf of hockeybuzz Joined: 07.31.2009
|
|
|
My simplistic understanding of the lockout is this: the current contract is up and the season can't start until they have a new one, the players want a bigger piece of the pie than they got in the last agreement and the owners don't want to give it to them. They can't agree on anything. How does dissolving the Players Union get the players a better contract? Why would the owners owe the players anything if the Union is dissolved? - Dkos
Well, it's certainly not about the players getting a bigger piece, as negotiations have settled on their share of HRR going from 57% down to 50%.
In a nutshell, the NHL started with enormous demands in their initial proposal, the NHLPA said no and essentially stalled. The NHL reduced some of their demands in their next proposal some time later, the NHLPA's reaction did not change. And it's more or less continued like that. Lots of posturing, grandstanding, and time wasting from both sides along the way.
The thing about dissolving the union is they can sue the NHL for locking them out in an anti-trust suit and attempt to recover damages from the lockout. In short, the gloves would be off, it's the final options when the union feels there's no way to negotiate a fair deal. That's really the best way I can put it without the both of us taking some courses on law. |
|
Dkos
Season Ticket Holder Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Gritty, PA Joined: 01.15.2007
|
|
|
Well, it's certainly not about the players getting a bigger piece, as negotiations have settled on their share of HRR going from 57% down to 50%.
In a nutshell, the NHL started with enormous demands in their initial proposal, the NHLPA said no and essentially stalled. The NHL reduced some of their demands in their next proposal some time later, the NHLPA's reaction did not change. And it's more or less continued like that. Lots of posturing, grandstanding, and time wasting from both sides along the way.
The thing about dissolving the union is they can sue the NHL for locking them out in an anti-trust suit and attempt to recover damages from the lockout. In short, the gloves would be off, it's the final options when the union feels there's no way to negotiate a fair deal. That's really the best way I can put it without the both of us taking some courses on law. - BulliesPhan87
How could they sue for locking them them out if it was not illegal to lock them out in the first palce? |
|
BulliesPhan87
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: the lone wolf of hockeybuzz Joined: 07.31.2009
|
|
|
How could they sue for locking them them out if it was not illegal to lock them out in the first palce? - Dkos
It's related to dissolving the union, I'm really not certain on the specifics. Travis Yost has been giving pretty good write ups on this, apparently it's following the NBA's lockout script rather closely. |
|
|
|
Father of the year in 2004 - ob18
|
|
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Candyland, PA Joined: 09.20.2007
|
|
|
My simplistic understanding of the lockout is this: the current contract is up and the season can't start until they have a new one, the players want a bigger piece of the pie than they got in the last agreement and the owners don't want to give it to them. They can't agree on anything. How does dissolving the Players Union get the players a better contract? Why would the owners owe the players anything if the Union is dissolved? - Dkos
The part about the players wanting a bigger piece of the pie than they got in the last agreement is untrue. The players have agreed to go from 57% of revenue to 50% of revenue. But they want existing contract honored.
|
|
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Candyland, PA Joined: 09.20.2007
|
|
|
How could they sue for locking them them out if it was not illegal to lock them out in the first palce? - Dkos
A common sense question. But it is what makes it so bizarre in my opinion. But when is the law about common sense.
|
|
Dkos
Season Ticket Holder Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Gritty, PA Joined: 01.15.2007
|
|
|
The part about the players wanting a bigger piece of the pie than they got in the last agreement is untrue. The players have agreed to go from 57% of revenue to 50% of revenue. But they want existing contract honored. - MJL
BulliesPhan already corrected me...see above |
|
eayost
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Into the Void, PA Joined: 04.14.2010
|
|
|
How could they sue for locking them them out if it was not illegal to lock them out in the first palce? - Dkos
This makes absolutely no sense to me either |
|
nails
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: thread killer, PA Joined: 02.05.2007
|
|
|
This makes absolutely no sense to me either - eayost
I think they are saying the owners are inhibiting their ability a nd right to work, especially for those under contract. Where this logic fails is that there are other entities that can and do compete for their services. |
|
ob18
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: That matters less than you hope it does Joined: 07.20.2007
|
|
|
nails
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: thread killer, PA Joined: 02.05.2007
|
|
|
ob18
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: That matters less than you hope it does Joined: 07.20.2007
|
|
|
Too bad they (both sides) have let this become personal and not business. As soon as emotion gets attached to business, irrational decisions get made - nails
I just laugh now |
|
MBFlyerfan
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Be nice from now on, NJ Joined: 03.17.2006
|
|
|
Phantoms lose 3-2. but hey, I got to watch some hockey tonight. |
|
nails
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: thread killer, PA Joined: 02.05.2007
|
|
|
I just laugh now - ob18
This is the most I have paid attention over the last month. |
|
nails
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: thread killer, PA Joined: 02.05.2007
|
|
|
Phantoms lose 3-2. but hey, I got to watch some hockey tonight. - MBFlyerfan
Must be nice |
|
ob18
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: That matters less than you hope it does Joined: 07.20.2007
|
|
|
Phantoms lose 3-2. but hey, I got to watch some hockey tonight. - MBFlyerfan
It was a replay from Saturday |
|
Flyskippy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Ignoreland, GA Joined: 11.04.2005
|
|
|
Father of the year in 2004 - ob18
Heh. It's not like I drove over there figuring I'd see *that* happen. Heck, no injury that freakish has happened since. |
|
BulliesPhan87
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: the lone wolf of hockeybuzz Joined: 07.31.2009
|
|
|
BulliesPhan already corrected me...see above - Dkos
Corrected is such a harsh word. I prefer 'clarified'. |
|
JoeRussomanno
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: me bitter? F-no i think it's hilarious Joined: 12.14.2011
|
|
|
Good work as usual bill. As a father of two boys I'd advise you not to wait to take your boy to a game. I used to live in glenside near the trian station and started taking our first to games when he was two. They are definitely my favorite memories of going to games. - twotoekenn
I took my son and daughter to their first game last year. My son didn't want to go at first because he wanted to stay home with mom-mom and pop-pop while they babysat the twins. Anyway the long and short is once we got there he was ecstatic. I don't force sports on my kids and let them enjoy it at their own pace. So I was surprised when my sister asked him who his favorite player was and he pointed down at ol' 28 and said "him! Claude Giroux that's my favorite player!"
Keep in mind he was 5 at the time I never told him who the best player was or anything like that I did tell him my favorite player was Hartnell tho. |
|
JoeRussomanno
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: me bitter? F-no i think it's hilarious Joined: 12.14.2011
|
|
|
I gotta say with the way things are going in this country I couldn't care less if hockey resumes. I'm just grateful for my family and their safety. Also some of you are pretty cool people so it's good to stay in touch I guess. If anything I hope hockey gets going for the fact that people like Bill can maintain healthy employment. |
|