He played with Tanner Glass and Rick Rypien on the third/fourth line. - mayorofangrytown
Couturier had more points (27) in his first full year than Ryan Kesler (23) did. In fact, Kesler didn't score more than 37 points until his 4th full year in the league when he was 24.
Location: me bitter? F-no i think it's hilarious Joined: 12.14.2011
Mar 5 @ 1:29 PM ET
I hate advanced metrics. They don't work in baseball and they aren't going to work in hockey. Nice tool for managers and coaches but that's about it. I get tired of talking about money and hockey.
I'm in no way implying he's not a good young player and I like him but he's not the player people on here are describing most days. He's not overly physical. He rarely controls the play. He doesn't put up points. I can see how well he plays defensively but if I'm comparing him to a recent Selke candidate and his second year in the league he's no Ryan Kesler. - mayorofangrytown
his hits are terribly low (10) and his faceoffs are down this year which I think will improve but his shooting percentage is 4.8, kinda low if you ask me for a guy with so-called great hands.
Ryan Kelser didn't play a full season with the Canucks until his third year from his draft year at 21 years old. That might not seem like a big deal, but physically that is a big deal. - psuhockey
It's a big deal. I usually hate to compare players. I'm with Joe though, although I take it from a different starting point. I don't see what Couturier is doing right now that Laughton won't be able to approximate next season.
Couturier had more points (27) in his first full year than Ryan Kesler (23) did. In fact, Kesler didn't score more than 37 points until his 4th full year in the league when he was 24. - NickTheKid87
But you could see he was a different player. He could carry, he could knock players off the puck, his shot was tremendous. You could see him coming.
Aside: I think we hype up movies to much. Everyone was like "Go see the Hangover! It's so funny". Saw it, thought it was okay because I was expecting much more. Same with Les Miserables recently. Some of my favorite movies have been one's I had not info on before seeing it. - NickTheKid87
That is true, but regardless of expectations, I despised that girl.
But you could see he was a different player. He could carry, he could knock players off the puck, his shot was tremendous. You could see him coming. - mayorofangrytown
We've seen Couturier shut down the league's MVP among others and we've seen him score (he had a 4 or 5 game goal streak last year, some of them goal scorers goals) and he's had a lot of great chances this year although he hasn't managed to bury all of them. Also, hindsight is 20/20.
Location: me bitter? F-no i think it's hilarious Joined: 12.14.2011
Mar 5 @ 1:35 PM ET
We've seen Couturier shut down the league's MVP among others and we've seen him score (he had a 4 or 5 game goal streak last year, some of them goal scorers goals) and he's had a lot of great chances this year although he hasn't managed to bury all of them. Also, hindsight is 20/20. - NickTheKid87
see I think Laughton could match that and with some physicality that would cause a neanderthal meltdown so big the ice age would be erased from history.
FlyersGrace Season Ticket Holder Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Pronger "Play the game puffnuts!" , DE Joined: 07.02.2012
Mar 5 @ 1:36 PM ET
We've seen Couturier shut down the league's MVP among others and we've seen him score (he had a 4 or 5 game goal streak last year, some of them goal scorers goals) and he's had a lot of great chances this year although he hasn't managed to bury all of them. Also, hindsight is 20/20. - NickTheKid87
I think that Gagne on his line is going to super help him open up his offense some.
Bill Barber aside, you must have missed the 2004 playoffs.
- Lexington Flyer
Not at all. He was invisible in the first round just like every other playoff series he was ever in. Played great off an on in the next 13 games. Eliminated in the Conference Finals. For one season he was the best third line center in the game.
Yes. But Burrows wasn't the first line player then that he is now. They sort of came up together. - mayorofangrytown
Yes, both developed into first line players. Not sure that the linemates Couturier has spent most of his ice time with will ever develop into what Burrows has. That's why I utilize advanced metrics, to analyze things more deeply.
Kesler's a special player, when he's healthy. A lot of what he does "pops". A lot of what Couturier does is more subtle.
Location: me bitter? F-no i think it's hilarious Joined: 12.14.2011
Mar 5 @ 1:38 PM ET
Yes, both developed into first line players. Not sure that the linemates Couturier has spent most of his ice time with will ever develop into what Burrows has. That's why I utilize advanced metrics, to analyze things more deeply.
Kesler's a special player, when he's healthy. A lot of what he does "pops". A lot of what Couturier does is more subtle. - Jsaquella
yea couturier does have that nifty poke check/steal puck move.
see I think Laughton could match that and with some physicality that would cause a neanderthal meltdown so big the ice age would be erased from history. - JoeRussomanno
Laughton has shown that he can irritate and bang, hasn't shown where he can be as good as Couturier defensively.
It's a big deal. I usually hate to compare players. I'm with Joe though, although I take it from a different starting point. I don't see what Couturier is doing right now that Laughton won't be able to approximate next season. - mayorofangrytown
My point is to wait, at least another full year to see what kind of player his really is. This season, besides being his sophomore year, is almost a waste to judge anybody. Half the Flyers were sitting around getting fat at home or in Europe and the AHL guys were playing with slop and picking up bad habits at that level. It's hard to take seriously a year where Montreal, Toronto and Ottawa's AHL team are comfortably in playoff position while the Rangers and Flyers are struggling to get in.
see I think Laughton could match that and with some physicality that would cause a neanderthal meltdown so big the ice age would be erased from history. - JoeRussomanno
I think Laughton could do that too but I don't think he'll produce offensively like Couturier has the potential to. Comparing their jr. numbers:
Couturier:
09/10: 68 GP, 41 G, 55 A, 96 PTS
10/11: 58 GP, 36 G, 60 A, 96 PTS
Laughton:
11/12: 64 GP, 21 G, 32 A, 53 PTS
12/13: 46 GP, 22 G, 32 A, 54 PTS
Location: me bitter? F-no i think it's hilarious Joined: 12.14.2011
Mar 5 @ 1:40 PM ET
My point is to wait, at least another full year to see what kind of player his really is. This season, besides being his sophomore year, is almost a waste to judge anybody. Half the Flyers were sitting around getting fat at home or in Europe and the AHL guys were playing with slop and picking up bad habits at that level. It's hard to take seriously a year where Montreal, Toronto and Ottawa's AHL team are comfortably in playoff position while the Rangers and Flyers are struggling to get in. - psuhockey
I'm not knocking COuturier but if you can move him for a OEL type dman, then you better not hesitate.
I think that Gagne on his line is going to super help him open up his offense some. - FlyersGrace
I agree 100%. Let's face it, Talbot, Fedotenko, Knuble and Rinaldo aren't wingers that make offense easy. Gagne is a proven scorer with a little left in the take it seems.
Yes, both developed into first line players. Not sure that the linemates Couturier has spent most of his ice time with will ever develop into what Burrows has. That's why I utilize advanced metrics, to analyze things more deeply.
Kesler's a special player, when he's healthy. A lot of what he does "pops". A lot of what Couturier does is more subtle. - Jsaquella
I really didn't want to start comparing them. My fault for bringing Kesler up.
I don't want to demean the kid. I like him. I just, like I've said repeatedly, don't see the player everyone raves about. I see a good second year pro who is playing well defensively and developing at pace. Like a lot of second year pros.