this is man's fault.

Then starting in 1900, you had a steady rise of sunspot activity, culminating in the Modern Maximum—a period of sunspot activity far exceeding the previous high water mark of Medieval times. The “global warming” trend (and “hockey stick”) actually tracks perfectly with solar sunspot activity. Then, about ten years ago or so, sunspot activity started dipping into another grand solar minimum. It was around this time that climate “scientists” started dropping the “global warming” label and started talking about “climate change” instead.



Read more at

http://www.express.co.uk/...ters-slump-solar-activity

http://www.theguardian.co...-funding?CMP=share_btn_tw


Exxon said Wednesday that it now acknowledges the risk of climate change and does not fund climate change denial groups.

Some climate campaigners have likened the industry to the conduct of the tobacco industry which for decades resisted the evidence that smoking causes cancer.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/08/exxon-climate-change-1981-climate-denier-funding?CMP=share_btn_tw


Exxon said Wednesday that it now acknowledges the risk of climate change and does not fund climate change denial groups.

Some climate campaigners have likened the industry to the conduct of the tobacco industry which for decades resisted the evidence that smoking causes cancer.
- BingoLady

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/08/exxon-climate-change-1981-climate-denier-funding?CMP=share_btn_tw


Exxon said Wednesday that it now acknowledges the risk of climate change and does not fund climate change denial groups.

Some climate campaigners have likened the industry to the conduct of the tobacco industry which for decades resisted the evidence that smoking causes cancer.
- BingoLady

Your move Dopps.

71% of the Earths' surface is covered by Oceans. That leaves 29% of the Earths' surface a land and lakes.

Of that 29% not covered by oceans, 3% is covered by urban areas.

If you include agricultural lands, the Human footprint on the Earths' surface is roughly 12.5% of the Earths' surface.

To actually believe that human activity (on 12.5% of Earths' surface) is the largest factor driving Global Warming is preposterous.

The Sun, by far influences the Natural warming and cooling cycles in the Earths' climate history that goes back 10s of thousands of years.

The money being spent, by the taxpayers of the world to "combat global warming" is futile, we can't affect the climate to begin with, and to think we can cool it is ridiculous.

The wasted tax dollars would be better spent cleaning up fresh water sources, air and water pollution (NO.........CO2 is NOT pollution) and adapting to the naturally causes changes in climate.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Nobel Prize-Winning Scientist Who Endorsed Obama Now Says Prez. is ‘Ridiculous’ & ‘Dead Wrong’ on ‘Global Warming’

Nobel Prize Winning Physicist Dr. Ivar Giaever: 'Global warming is a non-problem'

'I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you're wrong. Dead wrong.'

'Global warming really has become a new religion.'

"I am worried very much about the [UN] conference in Paris in November...I think that the people who are alarmist are in a very strong position.'

'We have to stop wasting huge, I mean huge amounts of money on global warming.'





read the article here http://www.climatedepot.c...-wrong-on-global-warming/

71% of the earth's surface is water, which means it's bigger and stronger than land. There is nothing we can do to fight water because it's too big. It will always beat land.

it's absurd how many errors and inaccuracies are in this chart!

it's absurd how many errors and inaccuracies are in this chart!
- Crimsoninja

Honestly. The line drawn through the middle is completelyarbitrary. The majority of the weight is over that line, and the starting point is well below it, while the ending point is on it.

- watsonnostaw

Honestly. The line drawn through the middle is completelyarbitrary. The majority of the weight is over that line, and the starting point is well below it, while the ending point is on it.
- Schenn-Sational!

That line, is the average over the past 18 plus years.

No warming over that time. Even the High Priests of the Global Warming Religion at the Holy UN has agreed with these facts.


Does nor mean you have to stop believing all those prophecies that ST. Gore proclaimed when he came down from the mountain 20 years ago, with his awards..............never mind that NOT ONE of the predictions have come even close to being true.


Damn computer models!!!!


http://www.forbes.com/sit...of-actual-global-warming/


http://wattsupwiththat.co...s-in-the-ar5-final-draft/



http://www.dailymail.co.u...eenhouse-gases-wrong.html



http://www.telegraph.co.u...ing-claim-scientists.html

That line, is the average over the past 18 plus years.

No warming over that time. Even the High Priests of the Global Warming Religion at the Holy UN has agreed with these facts.


Does nor mean you have to stop believing all those prophecies that ST. Gore proclaimed when he came down from the mountain 20 years ago, with his awards..............never mind that NOT ONE of the predictions have come even close to being true.


Damn computer models!!!!


http://www.forbes.com/sit...of-actual-global-warming/


http://wattsupwiththat.co...s-in-the-ar5-final-draft/



http://www.dailymail.co.u...eenhouse-gases-wrong.html



http://www.telegraph.co.u...ing-claim-scientists.html
- D0PPELGANGER

links?

links?
- the_cause2000

- watsonnostaw

do you putt from the rough?

do you putt from the rough?
- the_cause2000

i putt from the tee

i putt from the tee
- watsonnostaw

*has to get code book out

Dear Dopps,

Pour vous: http://www.brainpickings..../backfire-effect-mcraney/

Your Pal, aschuter.

I honestly think it's real tho

I honestly think it's real tho
- Nucker101

Ya I'm legit on board

I honestly think it's real tho
- Nucker101

If there is any warming or cooling, its naturally occurring, not driven by human activity.

The Vikings grew barley in Greenland 1,000 years ago, during the Medieval Warm Period, so it must have been a lot warmer then.

The Maunder minimum which happened during the little Ice age was 300 years ago, during which Europe and North America experienced very cold winters.

Doubt in humans reduced their CO2 output between the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age.