So a bunch of people many of whom have no background in the field of climatology are opposing the consensus of, what, like upwards of 97% of others in the community? - aschuter82
....Do us a favor and prove what you said: "Chernobil didn't just blow up........the engineers were purposely screwing with it, to see "how bad" they could get it, and save it." BS conspiracy....................." the Fukushima reactor..........did you buy any chance notice what else happened in Japan that day???? LOL" you can LOL as a kid would, but people died there, and you CAN´T blame on tsunamis or quakes, What about RADIO ACTIVE WASTE? Would you put it in your back yard?........................"And even if you were right, and it took "some bars' " Not some bars, maybe modern ships are able to store more radioactive stuff, but that is useless unless for war times, cos crews need hollydays, so either way they need to go back to their home ports after few months.................................."imagine how much better it is than the tens of thousands of gallons of fuel it would take to run that same ship " Yeah, but they are warships, therefore can be attacked by many ways, and nuclear reactors don´t behave good if you blow them...
The speech by former US Vice-President Al Gore was apocalyptic. ‘The North Polar ice cap is falling off a cliff,’ he said. ‘It could be completely gone in summer in as little as seven years. Seven years from now.’
Those comments came in 2007 as Mr Gore accepted the Nobel Peace Prize for his campaigning on climate change.
But seven years after his warning, The Mail on Sunday can reveal that, far from vanishing, the Arctic ice cap has expanded for the second year in succession – with a surge, depending on how you measure it, of between 43 and 63 per cent since 2012.
If he did, he'd notice that in the survey he linked to( http://wattsupwiththat.co...-busted-by-a-real-survey/ ), the vast majority of scientists agree that the planet is warming. 62% believe that humans have a large hand in that... and 21% say that they don't know what's causing it, but it is happening.
Only 4% are deniers like Dopps. Except smarter. Because, you know... they're not dopps.
Location: i love how not saying dumb things on the internet was never an option. Joined: 09.29.2005
Dec 22 @ 8:59 AM ET
If he did, he'd notice that in the survey he linked to( http://wattsupwiththat.co...-busted-by-a-real-survey/ ), the vast majority of scientists agree that the planet is warming. 62% believe that humans have a large hand in that... and 21% say that they don't know what's causing it, but it is happening.
Only 4% are deniers like Dopps. Except smarter. Because, you know... they're not dopps. - Feeling Glucky?
If he did, he'd notice that in the survey he linked to( http://wattsupwiththat.co...-busted-by-a-real-survey/ ), the vast majority of scientists agree that the planet is warming. 62% believe that humans have a large hand in that... and 21% say that they don't know what's causing it, but it is happening.
Only 4% are deniers like Dopps. Except smarter. Because, you know... they're not dopps. - Feeling Glucky?
That's basically what I was insinuating, but ole Doppsy wouldn't take the bait.
South Pole sees no warming for 37 years. 'For the whole of the satellite record, the South Polar region has had a negative trend. So much for a fingerprint of warming due to the enhanced greenhouse effect being greater warming at the Poles!'
November 2015 Update
UAH v6.0 (University of Alabama Huntsville satellite) data for November were released a couple of days ago. Here are updated graphs for various regions showing the furthest back one can go to show a zero or negative trend (less than +0.01C/ 100 years) in lower tropospheric temperatures. For the second month of the climb towards the El Nino peak, there is still NO pause in the Northern Hemisphere trend. However, in some regions the pause has lengthened. Note: The satellite record commences in December 1978. The entire satellite record is now 37 years long- 444 months.
Satellite records are checked against radiosonde measurements (weather balloon) for accuracy. It is the one class of records that actually have a check and balance system.
Warmist's don't like the satellite data because they don't fit the agenda. Plain and simple. When the hypothesis, catastrophic climate change caused by anthropogenic CO2 as predicted by climate models, rather than adjust the models as the scientific method requires, they just condemn the measurement system.
What you realize at the end of the day is that this is not about climate change, this is about power, political agendas and social agendas. Science does not enter into their thinking.
South Pole sees no warming for 37 years. 'For the whole of the satellite record, the South Polar region has had a negative trend. So much for a fingerprint of warming due to the enhanced greenhouse effect being greater warming at the Poles!'
November 2015 Update
UAH v6.0 (University of Alabama Huntsville satellite) data for November were released a couple of days ago. Here are updated graphs for various regions showing the furthest back one can go to show a zero or negative trend (less than +0.01C/ 100 years) in lower tropospheric temperatures. For the second month of the climb towards the El Nino peak, there is still NO pause in the Northern Hemisphere trend. However, in some regions the pause has lengthened. Note: The satellite record commences in December 1978. The entire satellite record is now 37 years long- 444 months.
Satellite records are checked against radiosonde measurements (weather balloon) for accuracy. It is the one class of records that actually have a check and balance system.
Warmist's don't like the satellite data because they don't fit the agenda. Plain and simple. When the hypothesis, catastrophic climate change caused by anthropogenic CO2 as predicted by climate models, rather than adjust the models as the scientific method requires, they just condemn the measurement system.
What you realize at the end of the day is that this is not about climate change, this is about power, political agendas and social agendas. Science does not enter into their thinking.
- D0PPELGANGER
According to the link you provided, 96% of scientists agree the planet is heating.
The reason the oil company shills you like quoting bring up the South Pole is because of the hole in the ozone layer down there, which contributes to cooling.
Taking random snap shots of local climates doesn't disprove the insurmountable evidence for global warming. Sorry Dopps.
Ps- I don't know if I mentioned this before, but you've quoted some of the scientists that tobacco companies hired to prove smoking isn't bad for you. They now work for oil companies, they're the ones behind that "co2 is the gas of life" campaign you love. Let that sink in.
According to the link you provided, 96% of scientists agree the planet is heating.
The reason the oil company shills you like quoting bring up the South Pole is because of the hole in the ozone layer down there, which contributes to cooling.
Taking random snap shots of local climates doesn't disprove the insurmountable evidence for global warming. Sorry Dopps.
Ps- I don't know if I mentioned this before, but you've quoted some of the scientists that tobacco companies hired to prove smoking isn't bad for you. They now work for oil companies, they're the ones behind that "co2 is the gas of life" campaign you love. Let that sink in. - Feeling Glucky?
South Pole sees no warming for 37 years. 'For the whole of the satellite record, the South Polar region has had a negative trend. So much for a fingerprint of warming due to the enhanced greenhouse effect being greater warming at the Poles!'
November 2015 Update
UAH v6.0 (University of Alabama Huntsville satellite) data for November were released a couple of days ago. Here are updated graphs for various regions showing the furthest back one can go to show a zero or negative trend (less than +0.01C/ 100 years) in lower tropospheric temperatures. For the second month of the climb towards the El Nino peak, there is still NO pause in the Northern Hemisphere trend. However, in some regions the pause has lengthened. Note: The satellite record commences in December 1978. The entire satellite record is now 37 years long- 444 months.
Satellite records are checked against radiosonde measurements (weather balloon) for accuracy. It is the one class of records that actually have a check and balance system.
Warmist's don't like the satellite data because they don't fit the agenda. Plain and simple. When the hypothesis, catastrophic climate change caused by anthropogenic CO2 as predicted by climate models, rather than adjust the models as the scientific method requires, they just condemn the measurement system.
What you realize at the end of the day is that this is not about climate change, this is about power, political agendas and social agendas. Science does not enter into their thinking.
Great article. Please copy and paste it in its entirety in the future. Some people are too dumb to actually click links, and just assume they say things that are the opposite of what they actually say.
Great article. Please copy and paste it in its entirety in the future. Some people are too dumb to actually click links, and just assume they say things that are the opposite of what they actually say. - Feeling Glucky?
