“The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations
on the data. We're basing them on the climate models.”
- Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research

The models are convenient fictions
that provide something very useful.”
- Dr David Frame,
climate modeler, Oxford University

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"I believe it is appropriate to have an 'over-representation' of the facts
on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience."
- Al Gore,
Climate Change activist

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"It doesn't matter what is true,
it only matters what people believe is true."
- Paul Watson,
co-founder of Greenpeace

Leaked IPCC Climate Report Shows UN Overestimated Global Warming

Not scheduled for publication until next year, a leaked report by the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) presents evidence that fear-mongering over the magnitude of global warming may be a little too ambitious.

The preliminary report, which is available for download online, was leaked this month by an individual directly involved in the agency’s review process. After sifting through the analysis, critics found a chart comparing four separate temperature models, each of which has overstated temperature rises that the Earth has actually realized.

http://www.thenewamerican...restimated-global-warming

Perhaps you should learn the difference between the hoax of Man Made Climate change, and Naturally occurring cooling and warming cycles, that human activity has no impact on.

"The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
- Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations


1968 was the year of the Great Divide. It marked the zenith as well as the end
of the long post-war period of rapid economic growth in the industrialized
countries. But it was also a year of social unrest with the eruption of student
uprisings in many countries and other manifestations of alienation and
counter cultural protest. In addition, it was at that time that general and vocal
public awareness of the problems of the environment began to emerge.
A number of individuals close to decision-making points became
concerned about the apparent incapability of governments and the
international organizations of foreseeing, or even attempting to foresee, the
consequences of substantia material growth without sufficient thought as to
the quality aspects of the life that unprecedented general affluence should
make possible. It was felt that a group of independent thinkers concerned
with the long-term and deeper issues would be useful in complementing the
work of the bigger organizations.
The Clubof Rome took shape that year from these considerations, and was
founded by Aurelio Peccei and Alexander King at the Academia dei Lincei In
Rome. It chose as its initial theme, 'The Predicament of Mankind.' Aurello
Peccei was ts first president, a post he retained till his death in 1984. At
present, the group comprises one hundred independent individuals from
fifty-three countries. The Club has absolutely no political ambition. Its
members represent a wide diversity of cultures, ideologies, professions and
disciplines, and are united in a common concern for the future of humanity.
From the outset, the Club's thinking has been governed by three related
conceptual guidelines:


—adopting a global approach to the vast and complex problems of a world.
In which Interdependence between nations within a single planetary
system is constantly growing;

—focusing on issues, policies and options in a longer term perspective than
is possible for governments, which respond to the immediate concerns af
an insufficiently informed constituency;

—seeking a deeper understanding of the interactions within the tangle of
contemporary problems - political economic, social, cultural.
psychological, technological and environmental - for which the Club of
Rome adopted the term 'the world problematical".

Read more at http://www.bibliotecapley...firstglobalrevolution.htm or continue to believe the hoax.
- D0PPELGANGER

your thoughts on the first global revolution doc. please.

Oh I dunno maybe its not better to be safe than sorry when we're talking about our environment because there's lots of potentially inhabitable planets out there and we have the technology to get us there!!

Global warming is SUCH a hoax to take away power from the oil tycoons and put it in the hands of a bunch of neoliberal hippy someone who is attracted to the opposite sexs!!!!!!!!!

Oh I dunno maybe its not better to be safe than sorry when we're talking about our environment because there's lots of potentially inhabitable planets out there and we have the technology to get us there!!

Global warming is SUCH a hoax to take away power from the oil tycoons and put it in the hands of a bunch of neoliberal hippy someone who is attracted to the opposite sexs!!!!!!!!!
- twiztedmike

#passion

ICSC MEDIA RELEASE - ICSC CALLS FOR OPEN DEBATE ABOUT THE CAUSES OF CLIMATE CHANGE
http://www.climatescience...ntent&view=article&id=792

Attention: News Editors, Political, Science and Environment Reporters
CANADIAN GOVERNMENT SHOULD IGNORE GREENHOUSE GAS IMPACTS IN ENERGY POLICY FORMULATION
Pretending that climate science is settled, as authors of new open letter do, deceives the public

Ottawa, Canada, May 9, 2013: "Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver should reject the pleas of twelve climate scientists, economists and policy experts who signed an open letter urging him to make greenhouse gas impacts “a central consideration” of Canada’s hydrocarbon resources development,” said Tom Harris, executive director of the Ottawa-based International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC). “Energy plans should be restricted to addressing only the environmental concerns we know to be real, such as air, land and water pollution. The linkage between energy usage and climate is far too tenuous to be included in any serious national discussions about energy.”

“It is utter nonsense to say, as the open letter signers did, that ‘the responsibility for preventing dangerous climate change rests with today’s policymakers,’” said ICSC Science Advisory Board member, Dr. Tim Ball, former University of Winnipeg climatology professor. “We can’t even properly forecast global climate, let alone control it. The open letter’s advocacy of “avoiding 2?C of global warming” by altering our energy policy is ridiculous when cooling is more probable, and may have already started.”

“Spending billions of dollars to reduce Canada’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in a vain attempt to stop non-existent global warming is a tragic waste of our resources,” continued Ball. “By all means, we should work to control real pollution, but CO2, the greenhouse gas most under attack by climate campaigners, is a benefit to the environment, its rise resulting in more crop yield and a densification of forests.”

Speaking about the primary basis of the climate alarm, the forecasts of computerized climate models, applied mathematics professor and ICSC science advisor Dr. Chris Essex of the University of Western Ontario explained, “They can't predict the future because they are not comprehensive implementations of known physics. They are empirically based models of the type that would be used in an engineering problem, but without the empirical validation that must be done for engineering.”

“Many people, including people with PhDs, are very weak on this issue,” asserted Essex. "The big policy questions are beyond the best models we can currently make. Climate is far from a simple solved scientific problem, despite rampant proclamations and simplistic analogies suggesting otherwise. Policymakers, not to mention academics, must come to terms with that."

“Climate change appears to be driven primarily by natural variability,” said former Environment Canada Research Scientist and ICSC science advisor Dr. Madhav L. Khandekar. “The Earth has not warmed in last 16 years, despite about 250 billion tonnes of CO2 put out by human activity worldwide. Regardless, the net effect of any possible future warming and rising CO2 is most likely to be beneficial to humans, plants and wildlife.”

The real concern is possible global cooling, something that could have a disastrous effect on Canada, Khandekar, a contributing author to the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, warns. “Since the start of the new millennium, winters have become colder and snowier in Europe and North America. Winters in South America and South Africa have also become colder,” Khandekar explained. “North America may also quite likely see even colder winters in the next few years if forecasts of dropping solar activity prove to be correct.”

“The dozen academics who just signed the open letter to Minister Oliver are right about one thing: we do need a ‘serious debate about climate change and energy in this country,’” said Harris. “ICSC also encourages the Government to convene open, unbiased hearings into the state of modern climate science, inviting experts of all reputable points of view to testify. Only then will the public come to appreciate the vast uncertainty in this, arguably the most complex science ever tackled.”

The ICSC is a non-partisan group of scientists, economists and energy and policy experts who are working to promote better understanding of climate science and related policy worldwide. We aim to help create an environment in which a more rational, open discussion about climate issues emerges, thereby moving the debate away from implementation of costly and ineffectual “climate control” measures. Instead, ICSC encourages effective planning for, and adaptation to, inevitable natural climate variability, and continuing scientific research into the causes and impacts of climate change.

ICSC also focuses on publicizing the repercussions of misguided plans to “solve the climate crisis”. This includes, but is not limited to, “carbon” sequestration as well as the dangerous impacts of attempts to replace conventional energy supplies with wind turbines, solar power, most biofuels and other ineffective and expensive energy sources.

George Carlin is sooooo 1994

George Carlin is sooooo 1994
- Not_Yan

I don't even think D0pps watched the entire thing

A senior Iranian cleric from Isfahan, Iran, said “immorality” among young Iranian women, stemming from dressing “improperly,” is resulting in climate change and causing the rivers and dams in Iran to run dry.

http://www.breitbart.com/...men-cause-climate-change/

A senior Iranian cleric from Isfahan, Iran, said “immorality” among young Iranian women, stemming from dressing “improperly,” is resulting in climate change and causing the rivers and dams in Iran to run dry.

http://www.breitbart.com/...men-cause-climate-change/
- D0PPELGANGER

This is what happens when religion is your only education.

I don't even think D0pps watched the entire thing
- PhillySportsGuy

I don't think he'd understand if he had.

This is what happens when religion is your only education.
- A_Tree

Right up there with whatever that idiots name is saying New Orleans gays caused Katrina.

Right up there with whatever that idiots name is saying New Orleans gays caused Katrina.
- Feeling Glucky?

its a fact

As of the end of the 2015 hurricane season, the US has experienced no major hurricane landfall since Hurricane Wilma in 2005, a drought that currently stands at ten years.

Al Gore told everyone that the US was going to experience a record number of hurricanes way back in 2004 ............ and he was wrong.

its a fact
- penguininnevada

we did it bro!!!

As of the end of the 2015 hurricane season, the US has experienced no major hurricane landfall since Hurricane Wilma in 2005, a drought that currently stands at ten years.

Al Gore told everyone that the US was going to experience a record number of hurricanes way back in 2004 ............ and he was wrong.
- D0PPELGANGER

I must admit they have lasted much longer in Raleigh than I ever thought they would.

“The problem we have now in the scientific community is that some scientists are mixing up their scientific role with that of climate activist. It is an indication of how science is gradually being influenced by political views. I am worried about the gradual influence of political views on science. Policy decisions need to be based on solid fact. The reality hasn’t been keeping up with the computer models.” – Professor Bengtsson


http://www.collective-evo...t-debunks-global-warming/

As reported by Principia Scientific International (PSI), Martin Mlynczak and his colleagues over at NASA tracked infrared emissions from the earth's upper atmosphere during and following a recent solar storm that took place between March 8-10. What they found was that the vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather than deposited into earth's lower atmosphere.

The result was an overall cooling effect that completely contradicts claims made by NASA's own climatology division that greenhouse gases are a cause of global warming. As illustrated by data collected using Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER), both carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), which are abundant in the earth's upper atmosphere, greenhouse gases reflect heating energy rather than absorb it.


http://www.naturalnews.co...bal_warming_debunked.html

You need help

You need help
- aschuter82

i'd totally just end it all.

Britain To ABOLISH Its Department Of Global Warming

http://thelibertarianrepu...rtment-of-global-warming/


Scientist James Lovelock: "It’s easier to save Dorset than the planet"

http://www.bournemouthech..._Dorset_than_the_planet_/