This would potentially kill big rivalry's that come from playoff hockey, as you don't see the other conference nearly as often as your own.
- carcus
And yet, new playoff rivalries would be produced from ... playoff hockey. Besides, in the new scheduling format you're playing everyone at least twice - so it's not like there's nearly as much "we don't see them" as we've seen from 2005-2013.
The travel is really the big stumbling block here, and I freely admit it - but I'm also the kind of person who thought instead of hearing continued "we have to travel 3 time zones, they get to play most of their games in the same timezone / get to take a bus to half of their games" complaints in the entire realignment debate, I would have ignored that issue entirely and redrawn divisions randomly, keeping a handful of natural rivalries (MTL-BOS, TOR-OTT, PIT-PHI, EDM-CGY, ANH-LA, FLA-TB, NYR-NYI or NJ, CHI-DET or STL) and scattered everyone else so that every division crossed at least 3 time zones so that everyone would be getting screwed. Then, if you want to go back to Patrick / Adams / Norris / Smythe for division names, you're good to go because there's no worries about "what, Boston is in the Central?" mislabeling.