BulliesPhan87
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: the lone wolf of hockeybuzz Joined: 07.31.2009
|
|
|
so really it's not a phrase that anyone would ever use
how did it become a commonly used expression that people use to mean something else?
this is the part that fascinates me - Don'tForgetTocchet
Properly used, you'd only really say it to call somebody else out. In practice, people use this phrase (incorrectly) to mean 'raises the question'. I think it got popular because people want to sound smart (see: pseudointellectual, BulliesPhan87) |
|
flyguy12
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Columbus, OH Joined: 10.22.2006
|
|
|
Buying out Bryz in this scenario? - Flyskippy
Yes, sir.
Begs the question? |
|
BringBack25
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: deep lurk Joined: 01.03.2007
|
|
|
so really it's not a phrase that anyone would ever use
how did it become a commonly used expression that people use to mean something else?
this is the part that fascinates me - Don'tForgetTocchet
These days, the most common usage is incorrect. The one I most often hear is something along the lines of "This begs the question, how did he ever get into that situation in the first place?" or "This begs the question, how is that even possible?". Those are not the correct usage, but it is probably the way I hear/see it used most often.
I'm not sure I've ever heard anyone use it correctly in a sentence. It's not really the kind of thing anyone would use in normal conversation. It's more of a label for a particular type of circular logic error than it is something you would use in conversation. |
|
Marc D
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: best smile, 14 without fake tees Joined: 03.28.2008
|
|
|
i have read these things over and over and have still not gotten anyone to use it in a sentence. other than
"that is begging the question"
why is it an expression, but no one can use it in a sentence - Don'tForgetTocchet
You would have to go over and sit in on a Parliament debate in England. I think they use this phrase correctly over there. |
|
aightwebang17
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Typical Montreal, PA Joined: 07.10.2008
|
|
|
These days, the most common usage is incorrect. The one I most often hear is something along the lines of "This begs the question, how did he ever get into that situation in the first place?" or "This begs the question, how is that even possible?". Those are not the correct usage, but it is probably the way I hear/see it used most often.
I'm not sure I've ever heard anyone use it correctly in a sentence. It's not really the kind of thing anyone would use in normal conversation. It's more of a label for a particular type of circular logic error than it is something you would use in conversation. - BringBack25
she will get her come uppins |
|
Marc D
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: best smile, 14 without fake tees Joined: 03.28.2008
|
|
|
I keep reading about teams that need big body defensive Defenseman and have too many puck mover types.
Flyers should get together with them and make a trade. |
|
BringBack25
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: deep lurk Joined: 01.03.2007
|
|
|
she will get her come uppins - aightwebang17
|
|
|
|
I keep reading about teams that need big body defensive Defenseman and have too many puck mover types.
Flyers should get together with them and make a trade. - Marc D
which teams? Coburn your man to ship out? |
|
Marc D
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: best smile, 14 without fake tees Joined: 03.28.2008
|
|
|
which teams? Coburn your man to ship out? - coffee junkie
Montreal was the latest.
Not sure about who to trade, but like Bill said, they likely need to re arrange the guys at the number 3-4-5 spots.
So one of Grossmann/Mez/Coburn I guess.
Kimmo and Luke Schenn I don't see going anywhere.
Well, I suppose Kimmo could be a rental at the trading deadline if they are foundering again next season, heaven forbid. |
|
|
|
Montreal was the latest.
Not sure about who to trade, but like Bill said, they likely need to re arrange the guys at the number 3-4-5 spots.
So one of Grossmann/Mez/Coburn I guess.
Kimmo and Luke Schenn I don't see going anywhere.
Well, I suppose Kimmo could be a rental at the trading deadline if they are foundering again next season, heaven forbid. - Marc D
Anyone on MTL tickle you whistle? Other then Subban |
|
JAKEw1234
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: 2Spookyville, PA Joined: 03.09.2013
|
|
|
Flyers will trade
Sean Couturier
player selected with the 2013th 11th overall
2014 1st
2015 1st
Cash
for
Shea Weber - Winning
If we gave that much, I'd really rather it be for a young Dman. Not unproven, but young. Age 24 at the latest. We would get half a decade to a decade more production out of them than a 28 year old Weber. |
|
JAKEw1234
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: 2Spookyville, PA Joined: 03.09.2013
|
|
|
Anyone on MTL tickle you whistle? Other then Subban - coffee junkie
The Flyers like old dmen lets trade Giroux for Markov |
|
|
|
Anyone on MTL tickle you whistle? Other then Subban - coffee junkie
Raphel Diaz. Before Subban came back Diaz was #1 PP unit and racked up quite a few points. Once Subban got back he was bumped down to #2 PP unit but played pretty well after. Ended up with 1 goal and 14 assists while averaging over 20 minutes and was a plus 4.
For the record, he had 7 assists in the 5 games Subban didn't play in. So it may have been a hot start due to increase in opportunity, but the talent level is there. |
|
BringBack25
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: deep lurk Joined: 01.03.2007
|
|
|
Raphel Diaz. Before Subban came back Diaz was #1 PP unit and racked up quite a few points. Once Subban got back he was bumped down to #2 PP unit but played pretty well after. Ended up with 1 goal and 14 assists while averaging over 20 minutes and was a plus 4.
For the record, he had 7 assists in the 5 games Subban didn't play in. So it may have been a hot start due to increase in opportunity, but the talent level is there. - GirouxForTheShow
Diaz?!? I think you mean Player 61.
|
|
|
|
So if I were having a conversation about Bryz .899 SV % and his astronomical GAA, and I proclaimed "Which begs the question, is the indicative of his play or the teams play, I would be incorrect? Because to me that is how I would use it. Meaning some fact/conversation/what-have-you brings about another question, thus literally begging the question to complete the conversation. |
|
|
|
Diaz?!? I think you mean Player 61.
- BringBack25
|
|
hammarby31
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: it's been 84 years, AZ Joined: 01.02.2007
|
|
|
JfC. |
|
Crimsoninja
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Dude, I am so sorry about whatever made you like this. Take it easy. Joined: 07.06.2007
|
|
|
Diaz?!? I think you mean Player 61.
- BringBack25
|
|
BringBack25
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: deep lurk Joined: 01.03.2007
|
|
|
So if I were having a conversation about Bryz .899 SV % and his astronomical GAA, and I proclaimed "Which begs the question, is the indicative of his play or the teams play, I would be incorrect? Because to me that is how I would use it. Meaning some fact/conversation/what-have-you brings about another question, thus literally begging the question to complete the conversation. - GirouxForTheShow
That would be incorrect. If you said "which raises the question..." that would be fine. "Begging the question" refers to a specific type of logic error when a person attempts to prove his/her point by restating the point, not proving it. For example, saying "I think Bryz sucks because he is a bad goalie" begs the question. Saying he sucks and saying he's a bad goalie are the same thing. One does not prove the other. |
|
BulliesPhan87
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: the lone wolf of hockeybuzz Joined: 07.31.2009
|
|
|
So if I were having a conversation about Bryz .899 SV % and his astronomical GAA, and I proclaimed "Which begs the question, is the indicative of his play or the teams play, I would be incorrect? Because to me that is how I would use it. Meaning some fact/conversation/what-have-you brings about another question, thus literally begging the question to complete the conversation. - GirouxForTheShow
That's how most use the phrase, but that is not traditionally what 'begging the question' means. Begging the question would be more akin to saying, "In regards to whether the team defense is causing the goalie to play poorly or vice versa, that the goalie is the catalyst, because his numbers say he is playing poorly." |
|
Flyskippy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Ignoreland, GA Joined: 11.04.2005
|
|
|
That would be incorrect. If you said "which raises the question..." that would be fine. "Begging the question" refers to a specific type of logic error when a person attempts to prove his/her point by restating the point, not proving it. For example, saying "I think Bryz sucks because he is a bad goalie" begs the question. Saying he sucks and saying he's a bad goalie are the same thing. One does not prove the other. - BringBack25
|
|
|
|
- Flyskippy
Skip you have some better x'slpainin to do |
|
hammarby31
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: it's been 84 years, AZ Joined: 01.02.2007
|
|
|
That would be incorrect. If you said "which raises the question..." that would be fine. "Begging the question" refers to a specific type of logic error when a person attempts to prove his/her point by restating the point, not proving it. For example, saying "I think Bryz sucks because he is a bad goalie" begs the question. Saying he sucks and saying he's a bad goalie are the same thing. One does not prove the other. - BringBack25
bryz sucks because he ducks and is therefore a bad goalie. or something like that. the could be something a hater MIGHT say, and they are proving their point with a specific example as to why he sucks. in this case, he or she would NOT be begging the question. |
|
bodiva88
Referee Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: There aren't any answers. Only choices. Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
she will get her come uppins - aightwebang17
It's either feast or phantom, for all intensive purposes. Which gives me a pit in my stomach. |
|
hammarby31
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: it's been 84 years, AZ Joined: 01.02.2007
|
|
|
It's either feast or phantom, for all intensive purposes. Which gives me a pit in my stomach. - bodiva88
was waiting for you to chime in with this. |
|