Biggus Dickus
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v Joined: 02.13.2010
|
|
|
i agree. i won't hate the Briere signing if it's part of a bigger plan. but if that's all he does with the top 9 i don't think it will make much sense. you can't just not have any size up front. - DoubleDown
True. Briere could be part of a much bigger plan. But two years seems too much to me. At that cap hit. |
|
|
|
This year: Galchenyuk
After that, who knows? - Scabeh
So DD plays the wing? |
|
3M
|
|
 |
Location: Antigua Joined: 06.30.2009
|
|
|
i agree. i won't hate the Briere signing if it's part of a bigger plan. but if that's all he does with the top 9 i don't think it will make much sense. you can't just not have any size up front. - DoubleDown
If MB was willing to pay to acquire Edler, and willing to pay to move up to the top-10 at the draft, it shows that he's not married to the roster and is willing to move pieces in the right deal. That's encouraging. |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
So DD plays the wing? - Champ
That would be best. |
|
Biggus Dickus
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v Joined: 02.13.2010
|
|
|
If MB was willing to pay to acquire Edler, and willing to pay to move up to the top-10 at the draft, it shows that he's not married to the roster and is willing to move pieces in the right deal. That's encouraging. - 3M
Still doubt he would trade Higgins though |
|
3M
|
|
 |
Location: Antigua Joined: 06.30.2009
|
|
|
True. Briere could be part of a much bigger plan. But two years seems too much to me. At that cap hit. - Biggus Richardus
If I was Bergevin, I'd make it two years if only to ensure he doesn't use Montreal as a layover only to go back to Philly next season. |
|
3M
|
|
 |
Location: Antigua Joined: 06.30.2009
|
|
|
Still doubt he would trade Higgins though - Biggus Richardus
What? |
|
elcabong
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: I'm not sure... I lost my GPS, QC Joined: 07.02.2010
|
|
|
Fine, we'll see. So who is your 3rd line centre? - Champ
Galchenyuk |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
If I was Bergevin, I'd make it two years if only to ensure he doesn't use Montreal as a layover only to go back to Philly next season. - 3M
Who cares? |
|
|
|
That would be best. - hscesq
Patches - Eller - DD
right? |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
Patches - Eller - DD
right? - Champ
I guess. |
|
jdacosta
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Montreal, QC Joined: 10.15.2008
|
|
|
No problem with briere @ 1-2 year as long as there's no NMC. Could be a good pick at trade deadline for a contending team needing clutch scoring for the playoffs.. |
|
|
|
Eller is a 3rd line center who plays both end of the ice well. But he is better defensively. That is my logic. Can DD do the job on the 3rd line. No he can't! DD needs to play in an offensive role. Eller is a good 3rd liner. On a good team he is 3rd liner. The Habs (I hope) are trying to build a good team. - Champ
He's better than that. By the end of last season, Eller was a bonafide 2nd line center with 1st line potential. Which is why he was drafted 13th overall. |
|
3M
|
|
 |
Location: Antigua Joined: 06.30.2009
|
|
|
Who cares? - hscesq
You don't...that's all that matters. |
|
|
|
So DD plays the wing? - Champ
Absolutely. Just like Briere. His little body can't take the beating a 1C/2C takes on a nightly basis in the NHL. We already saw the toll it took last year. |
|
Biggus Dickus
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v Joined: 02.13.2010
|
|
|
What? - 3M
The hossa deal. I was reaching a little |
|
|
|
If I was Bergevin, I'd make it two years if only to ensure he doesn't use Montreal as a layover only to go back to Philly next season. - 3M
I wouldn't want Briere for more than a year. |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
You don't...that's all that matters. - 3M
My point is, who cares if he leaves after a year? |
|
|
|
If MB was willing to pay to acquire Edler, and willing to pay to move up to the top-10 at the draft, it shows that he's not married to the roster and is willing to move pieces in the right deal. That's encouraging. - 3M
I'm still holding out hope that MB lands Edler. He's basically the Swedish, 27 year-old equivalent of Markov, minus the deteriorating body.
Plus, Mike Gillis is an impressively terrible GM. |
|
|
|
My point is, who cares if he leaves after a year? - hscesq
Are you kidding?! That would be ideal! |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
Absolutely. Just like Briere. His little body can't take the beating a 1C/2C takes on a nightly basis in the NHL. We already saw the toll it took last year. - oniremosewa
Though DD doesn't have the scoring touch or shot that DB has. |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
Are you kidding?! That would be ideal! - oniremosewa
Sure would. |
|
3M
|
|
 |
Location: Antigua Joined: 06.30.2009
|
|
|
Absolutely. Just like Briere. His little body can't take the beating a 1C/2C takes on a nightly basis in the NHL. We already saw the toll it took last year. - oniremosewa
"Position is just a place where you line up when they drop the puck." - Terry O'Reilly
|
|
elcabong
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: I'm not sure... I lost my GPS, QC Joined: 07.02.2010
|
|
|
Sure would. - hscesq
Apparently, that's what he's looking for. |
|
stinger67
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: QC Joined: 07.03.2008
|
|
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 Next |