some good some bad. Sense i'm an oilers fan i'll focus on that bit of it don't much care about the rest aside from feeling dissapointed you didn't rip themaple leafs.
We will need to see how belov and gerbeskov move the puck the one that moves it better will be in the other will be the 7th D and frankly i'd not object to have them both in and have nick shultz as 7th guy or trade him all together. I serisouly doubt that klefbom makes the jump to the NHL this year, he hasn't played much at all over the last year or so and it wouldn't be good for him he needs to go to the AHL and play a year first so we shouldn't see him this year unles we're in dire need due to injuries.
I project the D to look like this

Ference j shultz
smid petry
gerbeskov belov shultz
and thats fine with me. still not going to scare anyone but it's more mobile then it was. Frankly i concider gerbeskov an upgrade over whitney at the very least.

Thanks Dr.Phil.

But no, I just hate this discussion in particular.
- sanfordnson

You generally hate most things around here no?

Ever notice how the religious come up with these whacked out ideas and try and get everyone on board with it? They think they know something we don't and say the stupidest poop to defend their opinion? Pretty annoying, no?
- hunglikeapuck

there's difference between arguing based on evidence and arguing based on faith retard

This. This is what set off possibly the most ridiculous convo this thread has seen, and that is saying something. Should we engage in a debate about the reptilians next? Maybe we should also discuss the (frank)ing NWO and the Illuminati while we're at it. SOMEBODY GET JESSE VENTURA AND ALEX JONES.

Hate. Just.....hate.
- sanfordnson

Alex Jones is a pure agent of Project Mockingbird.

There's some stuff on here that people have posted that seems rediculous, but it's closer to the truth than most will ever be able to comprehend. However stay away from Alex Jones and David Icke...both are crazy or just plain full of sh**

You generally hate most things around here no?
- robin_steele264

I exagerrate of course. I don't hate much of anything. Except Tom Gilbert. (frank) Tom Gilbert.

I'll state right out of the gate, that I know very little about this third building. My comment was in response to that idea that a massive jet liner striking a hulking building that far off the ground would be sheer impossibility with regards to compromising the structure.

I will say again that it works at both ends. Enough force rattling the base of any untouched building would absolutely cripple it, such as, a 100+ storey building hitting the ground in a pile beside it. I'm not going to pretend to know the forces involved in a building falling I know little about.

It's speculative. No different than taking supposed irregularities and using it as evidence that a conspiracy exists.
- joel878

the problem with the twin towers, again, IS THE CONTROLLED COLLAPSE.

I exagerrate of course. I don't hate much of anything. Except Tom Gilbert. (frank) Tom Gilbert.
- sanfordnson

Dion face

The 3rd building and pentagon are massively huge questions that are just swept aside. If you raise these question you are immediately labeled a conspiracy whack job.


I see a problem with this.
- robin_steele264

As far as the third building goes, I'd like to think i can believe the actual study done by a very trusted organization, rather than some engineers who make their claims via youtube videos.... https://en.wikipedia.org/..._Standards_and_Technology
http://www.popularmechani...ring/architecture/4278874

The 3rd building and pentagon are massively huge questions that are just swept aside. If you raise these question you are immediately labeled a conspiracy whack job.


I see a problem with this.
- robin_steele264

I'm not going to claim to know a ton about either.

Perspective I guess. There are allegedly a ton of question marks with the moon landing, and a million other things. All in how one wants to perceive it.

Asking questions? Not cause for anything. Losing your mind, posting videos, and calling anyone who doesn't buy it stupid and ignorant = conspiracy whack job in my mind.

Steel melts at 2750F yes? Jet fuel burns up to 1500F.. so basically just over half of what it would of taken to melt the steel, that to you is enough to cause complete "controlled" collapse? I hope you don't design any buildings in my city.
- SpoiledByOil

Can a flame get hotter? Lets say oxygen carried through robust winds?
It may have been a little windy up there, not sure though.

the problem with the twin towers, again, IS THE CONTROLLED COLLAPSE.
- SpoiledByOil

The problem one last time, is that you very clearly know nothing about structure, nothing.

Lets bust it down to your education level. Very tall building, fall very far. What goes up, must come down.

Was it supposed to blow apart horizontally in your eyes? Jesus Christ.

As far as the third building goes, I'd like to think i can believe the actual study done by a very trusted organization, rather than some engineers who make their claims via youtube videos.... https://en.wikipedia.org/..._Standards_and_Technology
http://www.popularmechani...ring/architecture/4278874
- classicT

I've watched all the different views and experts.


Taking that into account, and the recorded orders to 'pull' the building, which means to demolish it, I find it hard to believe that was all planned and executed within hours of the attack.

Let's see your list of massive passenger jet liners that have slammed into other 100+ story buildings to compare to?

The idea that the bigger the building is the more impossible that is, is false. Larger buildings can be more susceptible to impact shots at either end, top or bottom. The impact from that shot alone before considering the following blast and relative heat would have rattled that entire building, gaining strength like a typhoon right to its foundations. There's a case to be made that the impact of one building hitting the ground would have been more traumatic to the other building than a record magnitude at its base.

What do you think happens if god hits the tallest building in the world right at its peak with a baseball bat? It rattles like a jenga tower, until its base can't hold itself.

I don't give a (frank) what either of you think. I build structures for a living, and I'm telling you it's far from impossible. Not asking.
- joel878

Please don't work on anything in Southern New Jersey. Thanks.

Please don't work on anything in Southern New Jersey. Thanks.
- mochoson

Wouldn't dare.

I've grown to accustomed to doing work for people that can afford it.

Wouldn't dare.

I've grown to accustomed to doing work for people that can afford it.
- joel878

*slow clap

I've watched all the different views and experts.


Taking that into account, and the recorded orders to 'pull' the building, which means to demolish it, I find it hard to believe that was all planned and executed within hours of the attack.
- robin_steele264

Wait didn't you just say the third building was a huge question? The link shared pretty clearly explains it...there was nothing planned and/or executed..

there's difference between arguing based on evidence and arguing based on faith retard
- SpoiledByOil

Their evidence is their faith.....
"I know god exists because I get a warm feeling inside when I pray. "

Wouldn't dare.

I've grown to accustomed to doing work for people that can afford it.
- joel878

Lol.

Wait didn't you just say the third building was a huge question? The link shared pretty clearly explains it...there was nothing planned and/or executed..
- classicT

Yeah I used to buy that explanation.


I don't now.

Wait didn't you just say the third building was a huge question? The link shared pretty clearly explains it...there was nothing planned and/or executed..
- classicT

You can clearly see explosions run up the main structure of the building right before it fell. Identical to a controlled demolition.

You need an education. Badly.
- joel878

Says the guy who thinks a plane flying into the tallest building in the world would cause it to collapse in a controlled manor.. Haha classic

It really seems that the only thing stopping mostly everyone from picking the Hawks to repeat, is the fact that its hard to repeat.....so why should the Hawks be able to if nobody else can? Well im glad to see someone go the other way, and pick them to win it again. I think its totally possible, and highly likely if people could just look beyond that whole "teams dont repeat" argument that involves past situations for everyone in general , and just focus on this specific Hawks team going into next year, pretend they arnt trying to repeat, and just evaluate their team VS the other teams.

This is the WORST thread in HockeyBuzz history....
- The-O-G

I guess you haven't been on a canuck thread lately?

I guess you haven't been on a canuck thread lately?
- Cptmjl

looking at a canucks thread = instant ban