Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Eric Engels: Team Canada Redux
Author Message
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme
Joined: 01.20.2009

Sep 4 @ 2:00 PM ET
Indeed, they were historically accurate of a previous ugly jersey.
- Oilhab


Green ones weren't bad, though.

Adam French
Atlanta Thrashers
Location: Isn't Cooley 5"11? You know who else is 5"11? Sydney Crosby. - Scabeh
Joined: 04.06.2011

Sep 4 @ 2:03 PM ET
Green ones weren't bad, though.


- Pecafan Fan

Too anti-Quebec.
slashtrash
Montreal Canadiens
Joined: 09.15.2010

Sep 4 @ 2:03 PM ET
Also, this one:


... although that particular colour scheme is nauseating.
bixll
Location: New Glasgow, NS
Joined: 09.04.2008

Sep 4 @ 2:06 PM ET
Also, this one:


... although that particular colour scheme is nauseating.

- slashtrash



You mean the Blue and White.
slashtrash
Montreal Canadiens
Joined: 09.15.2010

Sep 4 @ 2:07 PM ET
You mean the Blue and White.
- bixll

... no...
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme
Joined: 01.20.2009

Sep 4 @ 2:09 PM ET
You mean the Blue and White.
- bixll


who do you think you are? (frank)ing Sherlock Holmes or something?
bixll
Location: New Glasgow, NS
Joined: 09.04.2008

Sep 4 @ 2:09 PM ET
who do you think you are? (frank)ing Sherlock Holmes or something?
- Pecafan Fan



Its John Bixll Holmes.
stormey
Location: it is Babsy turning a boy into a man - JL0961
Joined: 10.13.2005

Sep 4 @ 2:11 PM ET
I just think its insane to compare historically accurate throwbacks meant to pay homage to sweaters a team wore 100 years ago to newly designed third jerseys
- Crimsoninja

OMG whine more!!!

four-eyed midget.
Crimsoninja
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Dude, I am so sorry about whatever made you like this. Take it easy.
Joined: 07.06.2007

Sep 4 @ 2:14 PM ET
OMG whine more!!!

four-eyed midget.

- stormey




but seriously, no glasses here. 20/20
never even been to an eye dr
_nay_
Boston Bruins
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty
Joined: 04.06.2011

Sep 4 @ 2:15 PM ET



but seriously, no glasses here. 20/20
never even been to an eye dr

- Crimsoninja


SO HOW DO YOU KNOW YOU'RE 20/20?
Fountain-San
Boston Bruins
Location: Marchand is a rat fink dweeb.., ME
Joined: 02.21.2007

Sep 4 @ 2:15 PM ET
SO HOW DO YOU KNOW YOU'RE 20/20?
- _nay_

exactly!
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme
Joined: 01.20.2009

Sep 4 @ 2:17 PM ET
SO HOW DO YOU KNOW YOU'RE 20/20?
- _nay_


He meant 20% vision in each eye.
stormey
Location: it is Babsy turning a boy into a man - JL0961
Joined: 10.13.2005

Sep 4 @ 2:17 PM ET



but seriously, no glasses here. 20/20
never even been to an eye dr

- Crimsoninja

whatever Poindexter.
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme
Joined: 01.20.2009

Sep 4 @ 2:18 PM ET
whatever Poindexter.
- stormey

Crimsoninja
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Dude, I am so sorry about whatever made you like this. Take it easy.
Joined: 07.06.2007

Sep 4 @ 2:18 PM ET
whatever Poindexter.
- stormey

gfy, Principal's kid.
FloRidaCats
Florida Panthers
Location: pretty sure people who take meth sometimes wonder why they don't just eat chocolate instead but some, FL
Joined: 01.22.2012

Sep 4 @ 2:20 PM ET
hello
dt99999
Montreal Canadiens
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim
Joined: 11.18.2008

Sep 4 @ 2:21 PM ET
gfy, Principal's kid.
- Crimsoninja

_nay_
Boston Bruins
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty
Joined: 04.06.2011

Sep 4 @ 2:21 PM ET
1. On page 2, it says:

Comprend
· Préparation des fêtes (inclus)

The exact English translation was:

Included
· Holiday Readiness (included)


I was wondering why it would say, “Comprend” instead of “Inclus” … I’d like to use the same term for both – which should I use?

2. On page 4, it says : Les surmontoirs ne font pas l’objet d’un planogramme; il s’agit d’extensions de la réserve.

I was wondering if it should be “Les surmontoirs ne font pas l’objet d’un planogramme; ils s’agissent d’extensions de la reserve” since surmontoirs is plural. Just wanted to double check!


The joys of freelance

golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Sep 4 @ 2:21 PM ET
He meant 20% vision in each eye.
- Pecafan Fan

Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme
Joined: 01.20.2009

Sep 4 @ 2:23 PM ET
1. On page 2, it says:

Comprend
· Préparation des fêtes (inclus)

The exact English translation was:

Included
· Holiday Readiness (included)


I was wondering why it would say, “Comprend” instead of “Inclus” … I’d like to use the same term for both – which should I use?

2. On page 4, it says : Les surmontoirs ne font pas l’objet d’un planogramme; il s’agit d’extensions de la réserve.

I was wondering if it should be “Les surmontoirs ne font pas l’objet d’un planogramme; ils s’agissent d’extensions de la reserve” since surmontoirs is plural. Just wanted to double check!


The joys of freelance

- _nay_

what... the
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens
Location: No, ON
Joined: 02.26.2007

Sep 4 @ 2:24 PM ET
1. On page 2, it says:

Comprend
· Préparation des fêtes (inclus)

The exact English translation was:

Included
· Holiday Readiness (included)


I was wondering why it would say, “Comprend” instead of “Inclus” … I’d like to use the same term for both – which should I use?

2. On page 4, it says : Les surmontoirs ne font pas l’objet d’un planogramme; il s’agit d’extensions de la réserve.

I was wondering if it should be “Les surmontoirs ne font pas l’objet d’un planogramme; ils s’agissent d’extensions de la reserve” since surmontoirs is plural. Just wanted to double check!


The joys of freelance

- _nay_


http://www.linguee.com/

then gfy
slashtrash
Montreal Canadiens
Joined: 09.15.2010

Sep 4 @ 2:24 PM ET
1. On page 2, it says:

Comprend
· Préparation des fêtes (inclus)

The exact English translation was:

Included
· Holiday Readiness (included)


I was wondering why it would say, “Comprend” instead of “Inclus” … I’d like to use the same term for both – which should I use?

2. On page 4, it says : Les surmontoirs ne font pas l’objet d’un planogramme; il s’agit d’extensions de la réserve.

I was wondering if it should be “Les surmontoirs ne font pas l’objet d’un planogramme; ils s’agissent d’extensions de la reserve” since surmontoirs is plural. Just wanted to double check!


The joys of freelance

- _nay_


Serious question?
_nay_
Boston Bruins
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty
Joined: 04.06.2011

Sep 4 @ 2:25 PM ET
http://www.linguee.com/

then gfy

- Symba007


I'm actually paid for using that.
Crimsoninja
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Dude, I am so sorry about whatever made you like this. Take it easy.
Joined: 07.06.2007

Sep 4 @ 2:28 PM ET
notice how he always vanishes for a few hours when i mention the Principal thing...
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens
Location: No, ON
Joined: 02.26.2007

Sep 4 @ 2:28 PM ET
I'm actually paid for using that.
- _nay_

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171  Next