Good evening boys…absolutely sh!ttered tonight - I'm the only one in my house that has no issues with it

Did we trade Edler yet?

nothing like quality family time.

Good evening boys…absolutely sh!ttered tonight - I'm the only one in my house that has no issues with it

Did we trade Edler yet?
- LeftCoaster

Lucky bastard

Lucky bastard
- VANTEL

Yay, another day that ends with y, y not have a drink.

Good evening boys…absolutely sh!ttered tonight - I'm the only one in my house that has no issues with it

Did we trade Edler yet?
- LeftCoaster

ROR can't be traded until February

Good evening boys…absolutely sh!ttered tonight - I'm the only one in my house that has no issues with it

Did we trade Edler yet?
- LeftCoaster

This is a quality post.

Good evening boys…absolutely sh!ttered tonight - I'm the only one in my house that has no issues with it

Did we trade Edler yet?
- LeftCoaster

ROR can't be traded until February
- Fosco

28th

ROR with 28 points - who on the Canucks has 28 point or more? Oh ya - only Daniel and Henrik

This place sucks when I don't post here.

Oh, and I was so close to adding Mantha, damnit. Was gonna try to pawn him off to one of the bottom feeders.

I say keep Tanev. People are speculating that he'll get the 4.6 mil D salary like right meow.

He's a D man that is on pace for a 24 point season. I don't think he'll end up with 8 goals. 6 maybe. Has a muffin of a shot and won't see PP time.

He might crack 2 mil at the end of the season. Might be 2.5 without a NTC...

Bieksa needs to stay - he has an underrated ability to keep the puck in the O zone. Plus he's got character and the only nasty D man on the roster. He leaves and what little truculence the canucks have is gone too.

Trade for a D like Ron Hainsey or something at the deadline for depth. Maybe Talinder if management is feeling saucy.
- Troutback

Agreed. Tanev is a keeper, he and Hamhuis are the rocks of our defense. Disagree that he can't be a PP d-man, I agree that his shot isn't great, but his poise and hockey sense is damn good, I'm okay with him on a 2nd unit if he's feeding a Garrison/Edler/Weber one timers.

Also disagree that the team should be looking to trade assets for a veteran defensemen, last thing we need to do IMO. When healthy you have Hamhuis, Tanev, Bieksa, Garrison, Edler, Corrado, Stanton in the organization and Weber can fill-in for a game here or there as a #6 guy without killing the team.

Just finished my 1st visit to puckrant, what a joke.
Clouts picked a USA team that Canada could beat.

Forward Lines

Eric Cole - Scott Gomez - Jeff Halpern

Ryan Malone - Lee Stempniak - Adam Hall

George Parros - Cam Janssen - Jared Boll

Bobby Ryan - David Booth - RJ Umberger

Defensive Pairings

Jeff Petry - Tom Gilbert

JM Liles - Joe Corvo

Ryan Whitney - Mike Komisarek

Just finished my 1st visit to puckrant, what a joke.
Clouts picked a USA team that Canada could beat.

Forward Lines

Eric Cole - Scott Gomez - Jeff Halpern

Ryan Malone - Lee Stempniak - Adam Hall

George Parros - Cam Janssen - Jared Boll

Bobby Ryan - David Booth - RJ Umberger

Defensive Pairings

Jeff Petry - Tom Gilbert

JM Liles - Joe Corvo

Ryan Whitney - Mike Komisarek
- A_SteamingLombardi

Too funny I was just there as well. Not my bag. Though I did creep the lady writer pics. Meow.

Too funny I was just there as well. Not my bag. Though I did creep the lady writer pics. Meow.
- thundachunk

Just had a look at Puckrant, is it just me or is that just too crowded looking? I don't think they could cram anything more on that home page.

Okay, I finally gave in and just checked it out too, comment section sucks, I thought he'd be smarter and try to rip of HB's comment section layout(which credit to Ek/his web designer, is pretty damn good). The bloggers all showing their pics kind of creeps me out. Only good thing about it is the 3 or 4 cute chicks and their pics. Bust. Eklund won.

Wtf was Huddle thinking leaving HB, but yet he joined that site?

Okay, I finally gave in and just checked it out too, comment section sucks, I thought he'd be smarter and try to rip of HB's comment section layout(which credit to Ek/his web designer, is pretty damn good). The bloggers all showing their pics kind of creeps me out. Only good thing about it is the 3 or 4 cute chicks and their pics. Bust. Eklund won.

Wtf was Huddle thinking leaving HB, but yet he joined that site?
- Nucker101

It had failure written all over it from the start

It had failure written all over it from the start
- Yeti1181

Really? I thought with Cloutier and Esplen at the helm it was destined for greatness. They paying Huddle in cheeseburgers?

Really? I thought with Cloutier and Esplen at the helm it was destined for greatness. They paying Huddle in cheeseburgers?
- golfingsince

Who did Huddle write for on here?

Who did Huddle write for on here?
- Chest Rockwell

Prospects guy, mostly OHL.

Really? I thought with Cloutier and Esplen at the helm it was destined for greatness. They paying Huddle in cheeseburgers?
- golfingsince

Esplen was a good writer but I liked busting his chops on occasion. He was a tad homerish which was odd since he's a flames fan.

Esplen was a decent writer but I liked busting his chops on occasion. He was a very homerish which was a clear attempt to get hits.
- Yeti1181

Fixed that for ya.

Okay, I finally gave in and just checked it out too, comment section sucks, I thought he'd be smarter and try to rip of HB's comment section layout(which credit to Ek/his web designer, is pretty damn good). The bloggers all showing their pics kind of creeps me out. Only good thing about it is the 3 or 4 cute chicks and their pics. Bust. Eklund won.

Wtf was Huddle thinking leaving HB, but yet he joined that site?
- Nucker101

Was just looking at that, he took Barry and the Detroit guy as well.

Esplen was a good writer but I liked busting his chops on occasion. He was a tad homerish which was odd since he's a flames fan.
- Yeti1181

He was a troll blogger here, those acts are fun at first but have a shelf life. It gets old quick for me personally. Canuck blogs were full of trolls and Canuck fans trying to defend Ian's homer comments, rarely had actual good debates or good Canuck-related talk like we've had.

Just my 2 cents, nothing against him personally and I know he did it for the hits/entertainment and wasn't being serious 100% of the time.

Esplen was a good writer but I liked busting his chops on occasion. He was a tad homerish which was odd since he's a flames fan.
- Yeti1181

Think about it though.....it actually makes sense now.