Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks: Stage Set for Olympic Semifinal, Notes from Practice
Author Message
AlexF
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Whistler, BC
Joined: 06.25.2011

Feb 21 @ 1:53 PM ET
Gullzy
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 02.07.2013

Feb 21 @ 2:06 PM ET
Kesler
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 21 @ 2:17 PM ET
Never a doubt
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks
Location: Duck City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Feb 21 @ 2:18 PM ET
Never a doubt
- VANTEL

Canadians controlled the game for the most part I thought. Sunday should be good!
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 21 @ 2:20 PM ET
Canadians controlled the game for the most part I thought. Sunday should be good!
- LeftCoaster

If the US plays like that tomorrow they will win lint.
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 21 @ 2:22 PM ET
Canadians controlled the game for the most part I thought. Sunday should be good!
- LeftCoaster

Canada is gonna have to be better. The Swedes are the best defensive team in the tourny and have enough guys who can score.
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 21 @ 2:23 PM ET
If the US plays like that tomorrow they will win lint.
- A_SteamingLombardi

Quick vs Rask should be a dandy
LeftCoaster
Anaheim Ducks
Location: Duck City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Feb 21 @ 2:26 PM ET
Quick vs Rask should be a dandy
- Bieksa#3

0-0
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 21 @ 2:28 PM ET
0-0
- LeftCoaster

Yep, shootout
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Feb 21 @ 2:34 PM ET
I'd say "very good", don't have a true workhorse #1 type, but I prefer the strategy to have 3 solid pairings instead of relying one pairing to do all the heavy lifting.

I'd deal Higgins before Hansen. Mainly due to age and Higgins having a great year, his possession stats are also great and a lot of teams that use those would pay up for him.

He has a limited NTC just like Hansen, but I'm guessing he wouldn't be totally against playing for a contending team at this stage of his career.

- Nucker101


It is all about the return. Higgins has had a pretty good year and if the return is better than Hansen then by all means especially if it could net a prospect or pick that could turn out to be something.

I would prefer to see one of the four big$ d-men traded for a legit top 6 forward who can contribute right away, but either way this roster needs some new energy and confidence in its core.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Feb 21 @ 2:37 PM ET
0-0
- LeftCoaster


If the Americans play inspired I see them winning by multiple goals, if they don't give a poop then I think Finland takes it in a 1-0 or 2-1 type of game.
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 21 @ 2:37 PM ET
It is all about the return. Higgins has had a pretty good year and if the return is better than Hansen then by all means especially if it could net a prospect or pick that could turn out to be something.

I would prefer to see one of the four big$ d-men traded for a legit top 6 forward who can contribute right away, but either way this roster needs some new energy and confidence in its core.

- hillbillydeluxe

I don't know. If we are gonna go young, the Higgins is an ideal player to help the young guys. Age included I'll take Higgins over Hansen. But if somebody comes offering a late 1st then bye bye higgins
Chest Rockwell
Vancouver Canucks
Location: White Rock, BC
Joined: 08.31.2007

Feb 21 @ 2:38 PM ET
Never a doubt
- VANTEL


Latvia worried me more.
walshyleafsfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita
Joined: 07.14.2011

Feb 21 @ 2:38 PM ET
@Fosco. Told you.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Feb 21 @ 2:39 PM ET
@Fosco. Told you.
- walshyleafsfan


He's a Sweden fan.
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver
Joined: 06.14.2012

Feb 21 @ 2:40 PM ET
I don't know. If we are gonna go young, the Higgins is an ideal player to help the young guys. Age included I'll take Higgins over Hansen. But if somebody comes offering a late 1st then bye bye higgins
- Bieksa#3


Torts prefers Higgins too.
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 21 @ 2:40 PM ET
It is all about the return. Higgins has had a pretty good year and if the return is better than Hansen then by all means especially if it could net a prospect or pick that could turn out to be something.

I would prefer to see one of the four big$ d-men traded for a legit top 6 forward who can contribute right away, but either way this roster needs some new energy and confidence in its core.

- hillbillydeluxe

Edler has looked very good for Sweden. He's our bait.
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 21 @ 2:42 PM ET
Torts prefers Higgins too.
- KB3Point0

I'm not a Hansen fan. He does hustle but not a great deal of hockey sense and has stone hands. He's a good 3rd line player but Higgins can play 2nd line
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 21 @ 2:49 PM ET
Edler has looked very good for Sweden. He's our bait.
- Bieksa#3

I wonder how many goals we can bounce off of Edler Sunday.
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Feb 21 @ 2:49 PM ET
I don't know. If we are gonna go young, the Higgins is an ideal player to help the young guys. Age included I'll take Higgins over Hansen. But if somebody comes offering a late 1st then bye bye higgins
- Bieksa#3


It is all case by case or trade by trade. We really need more scoring up front. I like what both Hansen and Higgins have brought, they are both good value. Neither is a 2nd liner though (Higgins has looked like he belonged there for some stretches) and if we can pickup a player or pick that could be that top 6 player, I think you have to go for it.

If Higgins or Hansen is worth a 1st round pick, I would make that trade... I would rather make the trade for a player already in another club's system and see where they are at in their development. All case by case.

Guessing most if not all agree that change is needed.

Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 21 @ 2:53 PM ET
I wonder how many goals we can bounce off of Edler Sunday.
- A_SteamingLombardi

Fosco
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Marwood's Beotch, BC
Joined: 12.08.2007

Feb 21 @ 2:53 PM ET
@Fosco. Told you.
- walshyleafsfan


I also said Canada would win.

I just questioned why you were so against the possibility they could lose, when Vancity said you were overly optimistic.

It was a highly contested 1-0 game...
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Feb 21 @ 2:54 PM ET
I wonder how many goals we can bounce off of Edler Sunday.
- A_SteamingLombardi




Thank God it's Daniel and not Henrik in the lineup for Sweden.
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 21 @ 2:55 PM ET
It is all case by case or trade by trade. We really need more scoring up front. I like what both Hansen and Higgins have brought, they are both good value. Neither is a 2nd liner though and if we can pickup a player or pick that could be that top 6 player, I think you have to go for it.

If Higgins or Hansen is worth a 1st round pick, I would make that trade... I would rather make the trade for a player already in another club's system and see where they are at in their development. All case by case.

Guessing most if not all agree that change is needed.


- hillbillydeluxe

My point is Higgins can fill in on the 2nd line. He's a 2nd/3rd line tweener. Hansen can't fill in. Given his contract and recent production coupled with a sellers market I see no reason why Higgins isn't worth a 1st. Look what Erat, Gaustad etc got in return
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 21 @ 2:56 PM ET



Thank God it's Daniel and not Henrik in the lineup for Sweden.

- Nucker101

Danny looks not bad. Maybe getting some confidence back.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next