WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
I think Tinordi could do a better job than Murray in the same role. He's ready to play those minutes. - QuebecPride
Are you out of your (frank)ing mind ?
Murray as been rock solid in the last 2 months. |
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: taking the low road Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
How about he doesn't move anything on the back end ? Habs are in a better position than exptected... why change it now ?
Finish the season and then unload.. ? no? - WaterBoy
8th in goals against and 20th in goals for...lets shore up that 7th D spot. |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
True, the only way I'll ever learn is if you're banned for 3 months. - mr.peanut
Deal |
|
QuebecPride
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Sherbrooke, QC Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
Here's an idea.....let's keep BOTH - braidan
If they keep both, one has to sit, and I'm afraid Tinordi will be the odd man out, considering the usage of Murray by Therrien.
Unless, they make Weaver the 7th D.
That would mean habs are still stuck with 5 Lefties on D and would make today's trade a head scratcher. |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
8th in goals against and 20th in goals for...lets shore up that 7th D spot. - Pie
3rd in the east. |
|
pete26
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Maple MAGA, ON Joined: 11.20.2008
|
|
|
Here's an idea.....let's keep BOTH - braidan
Yup.
Love a d men back there that bring what they both bring. |
|
mr.peanut
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Generational Poster, QC Joined: 12.18.2011
|
|
|
Deal - WaterBoy
No posting with your Rayven alt either. |
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: taking the low road Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
If they keep both, one has to sit, and I'm afraid Tinordi will be the odd man out, considering the usage of Murray by Therrien.
Unless, they make Weaver the 7th D.
That would mean habs are still stuck with 5 Lefties on D and would make today's trade a head scratcher. - QuebecPride
why does 1 have to sit...so weaver can play? (frank) him |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
No posting with your Rayven alt either. - mr.peanut
No posting with your Stee alt. |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
why does 1 have to sit...so weaver can play? (frank) him - Pie
Bingo |
|
braidan
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: State of Corruption. Joined: 09.27.2006
|
|
|
If they keep both, one has to sit, and I'm afraid Tinordi will be the odd man out, considering the usage of Murray by Therrien.
Unless, they make Weaver the 7th D.
That would mean habs are still stuck with 5 Lefties on D and would make today's trade a head scratcher. - QuebecPride
Because Drewiske became a fixture when we traded for him |
|
QuebecPride
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Sherbrooke, QC Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
Are you out of your (frank)ing mind ?
Murray as been rock solid in the last 2 months. - WaterBoy
He's playing well on the PK, certainly. Something Tinordi is excellent at too. I'll give the edge to Murray on that part because of his experience. But outside of that and physical play which is pretty similar, Tinordi is a superior player(mobility, puck-carrying ability, first pass, puck retrieval, 1v1s, vision, shot). |
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: taking the low road Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
3rd in the east. - WaterBoy
I'm with you. If weaver plays I hope its because they have someone lined up for a forward tomorrow. |
|
mr.peanut
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Generational Poster, QC Joined: 12.18.2011
|
|
|
No posting with your Stee alt. - WaterBoy
Why would I post with an alt if I'm not banned? |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
He's playing well on the PK, certainly. Something Tinordi is excellent at too. I'll give the edge to Murray on that part because of his experience. But outside of that and physical play which is pretty similar, Tinordi is a superior player(mobility, puck-carrying ability, first pass, puck retrieval, 1v1s, vision, shot). - QuebecPride
|
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: taking the low road Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
He's playing well on the PK, certainly. Something Tinordi is excellent at too. I'll give the edge to Murray on that part because of his experience. But outside of that and physical play which is pretty similar, Tinordi is a superior player(mobility, puck-carrying ability, first pass, puck retrieval, 1v1s, vision, shot). - QuebecPride
I think you've undervalued Murray at this point. Yes he was tits on a bull to start but he has really impressed me lately and I like that 3rd pairing right now. I agree that Tinordi has improved on his foot speed but retrieval and first pass meh not sure about that. Eitherway i just don't see Weaver as an improvement on either one. |
|
QuebecPride
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Sherbrooke, QC Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
8th in goals against and 20th in goals for...lets shore up that 7th D spot. - Pie
I think Price and Budaj have a lot to do with that. Habs D is average if not below that, but their goaltending has been stellar. |
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: taking the low road Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
I think Price and Budaj have a lot to do with that. Habs D is average if not below that, but their goaltending has been stellar. - QuebecPride
its not like we traded weaver for Budaj or price |
|
QuebecPride
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Sherbrooke, QC Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
I think you've undervalued Murray at this point. Yes he was tits on a bull to start but he has really impressed me lately and I like that 3rd pairing right now. I agree that Tinordi has improved on his foot speed but retrieval and first pass meh not sure about that. Eitherway i just don't see Weaver as an improvement on either one. - Pie
Weaver's better than both on the right side. That's what we have to get from that trade. I think Tinordi is superior to him as a D, but not on the right side. Weaver is not much of an improvement over Murray though, I agree. More mobile certainly, but less of a physical impact, even if he's no slouch in that department. |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
I think Price and Budaj have a lot to do with that. Habs D is average if not below that, but their goaltending has been stellar. - QuebecPride
Goaltending is great.
D ain't that bad and the coaching system is way better than what fans think it is.
|
|
QuebecPride
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Sherbrooke, QC Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
its not like we traded weaver for Budaj or price - Pie
I know, I said that because I don't think we can look at the goals given and say with confidence that the Habs defense was not in need. That number lies a lot on the goaltenders.
Are there more pressing needs though? No doubt. |
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: taking the low road Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
Weaver's better than both on the right side. That's what we have to get from that trade. I think Tinordi is superior to him as a D, but not on the right side. Weaver is not much of an improvement over Murray though, I agree. More mobile certainly, but less of a physical impact, even if he's no slouch in that department. - QuebecPride
the only way Weaver sees ice is if there is an injury or they move someone better than him Gorges, Emelin or Murray for some offensive help. If they don't do that its a wasted pick. |
|
pete26
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Maple MAGA, ON Joined: 11.20.2008
|
|
|
the only way Weaver sees ice is if there is an injury or they move someone better than him Gorges, Emelin or Murray for some offensive help. If they don't do that its a wasted pick. - Pie
You seem to have a lot against Weaver Pie.
Did you get ripped off for blanket on a Mexican beach? |
|
QuebecPride
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Sherbrooke, QC Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
the only way Weaver sees ice is if there is an injury or they move someone better than him Gorges, Emelin or Murray for some offensive help. If they don't do that its a wasted pick. - Pie
We'll know more about their plan with Weaver tomorrow.
You could very well be right and they wasted a pick for a 7th D they won't use. I'm an optimistic person so I hope it's not the case, but it could be. |
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: taking the low road Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
I know, I said that because I don't think we can look at the goals given and say with confidence that the Habs defense was not in need. That number lies a lot on the goaltenders.
Are there more pressing needs though? No doubt. - QuebecPride
I agree to a point. Pretty sure Mtls D blocked more shots than Budaj faced last night, if not it was close. That is a measure of possession, does Price offer better opportunity with rebound control than Budaj, certainly but some of it has to land on the forward group being unable to compete in the offensive zone a little help there might ease some of the burden on D, no? Having said that MTLs D is hardly the best ever which is why Weaver is a conundrum. I appreciate that you have a way to try and make it digestible, I just don't agree. |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171 Next |