Naw man, I'll share a car with one of my parents till I accumulate enough to get a decent new one.
- QuebecPride

no insurance?

Glad to see your natural "hair" bag protected you.

Nope, not even yesterday when a crazy women made a left turn without looking and rammed my car into a 'fardier'. My car is done


- QuebecPride

She made you a favor....

well, you're still young no big deal you can get yourself a cool sport car


- dt99999

Y VA PRENDRE L'AUTOBUS!!!!!
- dt99999

Damn, will your insurance get you another car at least ?
- BashCH

Naw, I was insured on 'one side'. Only the damage I would cause can be refunded. And since it's the women's fault and since my car was worth sweet (frank)all, I'm not expecting anything.

On the bright side, my insurance won't go up.

Naw, I was insured on 'one side'. Only the damage I would cause can be refunded. And since it's the women's fault and since my car was worth sweet (frank)all, I'm not expecting anything.

On the bright side, my insurance won't go up.
- QuebecPride

Oh... it will.

Naw, I was insured on 'one side'. Only the damage I would cause can be refunded. And since it's the women's fault and since my car was worth sweet (frank)all, I'm not expecting anything.

On the bright side, my insurance won't go up.
- QuebecPride

if it's her fault 100% you might still get compensated check your policy.

I had a car years ago that was worthless so insured one way. got totaled and it was 100% the other's fault so I got some dough.

Oh... it will.
- WaterBoy

Even if I'm declared innocent? They shouldn't have to pay for anything since I'm not at fault, should be the girl's insurance who pick up the bill. In their statistics I'm certainly more of a risk to have another accident since I've already had one.

I would understand an increase if it wasn't my first accident.

if it's her fault 100% you might still get compensated check your policy.

I had a car years ago that was worthless so insured one way. got totaled and it was 100% the other's fault so I got some dough.
- dt99999

Really? Interesting, I'll check into that, thanks

Edit: Just received a call from them and that's what they said. If I'm declared non-responsible and the car's a total loss, I'll get money

Even if I'm declared innocent? They shouldn't have to pay for anything since I'm not at fault, should be the girl's insurance who pick up the bill. In their statistics I'm certainly more of a risk to have another accident since I've already had one.

I would understand an increase if it wasn't my first accident.
- QuebecPride

You could be sitting at home and somebody totals your car... you'll end up paying more eventually.

Listen to DT on this one.

Naw, I was insured on 'one side'. Only the damage I would cause can be refunded. And since it's the women's fault and since my car was worth sweet (frank)all, I'm not expecting anything.

On the bright side, my insurance won't go up.
- QuebecPride

If you declared the accident it will, even if you didn't get any money.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/ca...alleged-assault-1.2596737

If you declared the accident it will, even if you didn't get any money.
- BashCH

yup

if it's her fault 100% you might still get compensated check your policy.

I had a car years ago that was worthless so insured one way. got totaled and it was 100% the other's fault so I got some dough.
- dt99999

nice. spent it on a hooker i hope...

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/jets-evander-kane-faces-lawsuit-over-alleged-assault-1.2596737
- Pecafan Fan

The man claims he suffered a concussion and various injuries to the head, neck, shoulders, back, chest, ribs, left leg and heel as a result of the alleged incident.


Sooo... the guy was basically checked by Byfuglien?

You could be sitting at home and somebody totals your car... you'll end up paying more eventually.

Listen to DT on this one.
- WaterBoy

Insurance companies are the worst...

The man claims he suffered a concussion and various injuries to the head, neck, shoulders, back, chest, ribs, left leg and heel as a result of the alleged incident.


Sooo... the guy was basically checked by Byfuglien?
- _nay_

How the (frank) does one injure his heel in a fight?

Insurance companies are the worst...
- TouenneTiiTree

There should be laws to prevent them from overcharging. It's ridiculous.

There should be laws to prevent them from overcharging. It's ridiculous.
- BashCH

I'm super pissed at the (frank)ing drivers licence going up... and on top of that the (frank)ing immatriculation.

taxe taxe taxe....assurances, taxessssssss

nice. spent it on a hooker i hope...
- DoubleDown

unfortunately that was when I was going through my asexual phase

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/jets-evander-kane-faces-lawsuit-over-alleged-assault-1.2596737
- Pecafan Fan

stormey said he was an angel now

There should be laws to prevent them from overcharging. It's ridiculous.
- BashCH

Indeed.

I don't know what's up with those new captors they want to install on every car that apparently makes people save money. They say you can't pay more, that you can just save money.

Somehow I expect them to turn those things obligatory in a few years and if they say you're a risky driver because you go over speed limits / do quick accelerations / you're late on brakes, they'll charge more.

I guess it's a form of safety, because people are more aware of their driving with that and the company must save money with the lesser risks of accidents. But I don't believe it's the only reason why they're shoving those things down our throats.

unfortunately that was when I was going through my a(???)sexual phase
- dt99999

...I think you are missing the following letters: n, a and l.

Indeed.

I don't know what's up with those new captors they want to install on every car that apparently makes people save money. They say you can't pay more, that you can just save money.

Somehow I expect them to turn those things obligatory in a few years and if they say you're a risky driver because you go over speed limits / do quick accelerations / you're late on brakes, they'll charge more.

I guess it's a form of safety, because people are more aware of their driving with that and the company must save money with the lesser risks of accidents. But I don't believe it's the only reason why they're shoving those things down our throats.
- QuebecPride

It's probably a good thing but then again old people that go 50 in a 70 zone are as dangerous as someone going 100 and their software probably doesn't consider that.

Indeed.

I don't know what's up with those new captors they want to install on every car that apparently makes people save money. They say you can't pay more, that you can just save money.

Somehow I expect them to turn those things obligatory in a few years and if they say you're a risky driver because you go over speed limits / do quick accelerations / you're late on brakes, they'll charge more.

I guess it's a form of safety, because people are more aware of their driving with that and the company must save money with the lesser risks of accidents. But I don't believe it's the only reason why they're shoving those things down our throats.
- QuebecPride

it is.

our company has a fleet of cars, the division that uses them wanted them so they could get the savings, our risk management department nixed becasue

a) it would probably drive insurance rates through the roof
b) in case of an accident all the evidence is there in black and white.