|
|
Lets just say I'd rather Gilles or no nuts run things then you if these are your solutions - Bieksa#3
What is that that you don't like about my scenarios? |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
I don't think that lineup is week down the middle, other then maybe 2nd line. 3rd has 2 Centers in Santo and Mathias
4th has Richardson and Gaunce
The second line although weak in the middle has 2 strong wingers. - Linden_4_Capt
Oh, well then, we should just put three centres on each line and we'll win the cup next year |
|
AlexF
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Whistler, BC Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
This is how I see it. Draisaiti is a slight reach for edm at #3 but aside from ekblad he would fill the biggest need
As I posted Saturday
Tanev and 7th overall for 3rd overall and 2nd rounder this yr. Canucks select MDC and oilers have a good chance or LD falling to 7 as most mocks have him 5-6 - Bieksa#3
Forgot where I read this but apparently the Canucks scouting staff see the early part of this draft having 2 distinct categories:
Cat 1: 2 players
Cat 2: 6 players
Assuming they mean Reinhardt and Ekbland are Cat 1, it seems they view the next 6 players rather equally. If that is the case then I wouldn't expect a trade to move up to 3rd pick. Again, just what I read. |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Masters week |
|
|
|
Oh, well then, we should just put three centres on each line and we'll win the cup next year - 1970vintage
The idea is to put versatile centers to play wing. Creates responsibility specially on a shutdown line. Look at Colorado. They have ROR plying wing to Duchene. My point is when you have 2 centers they play a different game then wingers. Also they can take chances in the faceoff circle. If you really want to split hairs. Nelson is also a center and I have him, Santo and Mathias on 1 line. |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
Forgot where I read this but apparently the Canucks scouting staff see the early part of this draft having 2 distinct categories:
Cat 1: 2 players
Cat 2: 6 players
Assuming they mean Reinhardt and Ekbland are Cat 1, it seems they view the next 6 players rather equally. If that is the case then I wouldn't expect a trade to move up to 3rd pick. Again, just what I read. - AlexF
Maybe I'm way off but I have Reinhart as the 3rd best forward in the draft. And have ekblad as the best player. I don't think Reinhart will ever be a star 1st line player, if a first liner at all |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
What is that that you don't like about my scenarios? - Linden_4_Capt
I'm not fond of any of the deals. But a top 6-7 pick, a top prospect and a good roster player for a guy who seems to be trending backwards and has well documented character issues? Milbury would be proud |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Maybe I'm way off but I have Reinhart as the 3rd best forward in the draft. And have ekblad as the best player. I don't think Reinhart will ever be a star 1st line player, if a first liner at all - Bieksa#3
Me neither... |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
The process. - Marwood
Dat reset. |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
Totally forgot about that. Thanks for clarifying Marwood. - AlexF
No worries. Maybe you can help me, If they reset last summer does that mean that mean that they retool this summer? This process thing can be confusing.
Edit: I'm so confused that I'm stuttering. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
No worries. Maybe you can help me, If they reset last summer does that mean that mean that they retool this summer? This process thing can be confusing. - Marwood
1. Reset
2. Retool
3. Rebuild
4. Repeat(1-3)
Da Process! |
|
|
|
I'm not fond of any of the deals. But a top 6-7 pick, a top prospect and a good roster player for a guy who seems to be trending backwards and has well documented character issues? Milbury would be proud - Bieksa#3
A top prospect that is small. We have our own history of how small players develop on this team. Secondly there is a slight chance that Shink will develop into a 30 goal scorer. A top 6-7 pick this year is about 3 years away from playing. This years draft there are maybe only 3 players that have top line caliber skill. they will be long gone by the time we pick. Kane is a proven top line player and a proven 30 goal scorer. Off ice issues, same can be said of Seguin. If a player is unhappy they will rebel. These are kids. As for a good roster player. We have enough of 3rd and 4th line players the we often use as top 6. If trading 1 of them away will net me a bonafide top 6 scoring winger I will do that trade every single time. I am all for tanking for a better pick but use that pick for something now. Young proven players in their early 20s will help this team from now for another 5-8 years. A pick will help this team in 3 years time for 8-10 years. Are you ok with the team status as is for another 2-3 years for the kids to develop? |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Go Jets!!! |
|
Jim_Robson
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: GillisDestroyedOurTeam, BC Joined: 04.02.2014
|
|
|
Cody Hodgson scored and no one but Ehrhoff would give him a high five - LeftCoaster
I love that. What a D-bag... |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I love that. What a D-bag... - Jim_Robson
*Waits for Booner* |
|
Jim_Robson
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: GillisDestroyedOurTeam, BC Joined: 04.02.2014
|
|
|
Go Jets!!! - Nucker101
Go Michael Hutchinson! |
|
SMP8719
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: ALDY , BC Joined: 02.24.2012
|
|
|
Go Jets!!! - Nucker101
No Ladd or Buff tonight..... |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
I love that. What a D-bag... - Jim_Robson
But.....but....all those dressing room and character problems are made up. |
|
AlexF
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Whistler, BC Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
Maybe I'm way off but I have Reinhart as the 3rd best forward in the draft. And have ekblad as the best player. I don't think Reinhart will ever be a star 1st line player, if a first liner at all - Bieksa#3
I don't watch CHL games on a regular basis so I wouldn't be the right person to comment on that either way.
One thing I will say, if Central Scouting's #1 ranked player might not even pan out as a top liner then this draft must be the weakest in years. |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
*Waits for Booner* - Nucker101
On a side note Kassian must be seeing a therapist or something. Guy even sounded normal in his 1st period interview on sat night |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Torts on Luongo tweet - "I'm not a twitter monster I didn't see it and I don't care about him." #Canucks
|
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
I don't watch CHL games on a regular basis so I wouldn't be the right person to comment on that either way.
One thing I will say, if Central Scouting's #1 ranked player might not even pan out as a top liner then this draft must be the weakest in years. - AlexF
Hows that? Look at Daigle, guy was considered as a clear cut #1 and a ton of players were better. Yakapov as well, although he wasn't clear cut. I can't see how the draft can be weaker then the 2012 one.
MDC is gonna be a star |
|
Jim_Robson
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: GillisDestroyedOurTeam, BC Joined: 04.02.2014
|
|
|
Jim_Robson
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: GillisDestroyedOurTeam, BC Joined: 04.02.2014
|
|
|
Hows that? Look at Daigle, guy was considered as a clear cut #1 and a ton of players were better. Yakapov as well, although he wasn't clear cut. I can't see how the draft can be weaker then the 2012 one.
MDC is gonna be a star - Bieksa#3
Agreed. If we trade up, I hope it's for him. |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
Agreed. If we trade up, I hope it's for him. - Jim_Robson
(frank)ing well better be |
|