muffin_man
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: no problem, as s hole - Eric Engels, NY
Joined: 02.10.2007
|
|
|
|
Not just interesting but the rule, end of story really. It's not a grey zone at all.
- habs12
The rule itself doesnt say anything about interference from a defender. PK should have gotten a penalty for keeping him pinned in the net if that all resulted the way it did.
Alsom if that is a by-the-book no goal, the book needs to be changed. |
|
mr.peanut
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
 |
Location: Generational Poster, QC
Joined: 12.18.2011
|
|
|
|
Rule 69.3
Stamkos out
- BingoLady
AH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA |
|
BingoLady
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Ultimate Warrior, NB
Joined: 07.15.2009
|
|
|
|
AH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
- mr.peanut
 |
|
Rayven
Boston Bruins |
|
 |
Location: The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
|
|
Stammer back on the bench |
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: taking the low road
Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
|
Rule 69.3
Stamkos out
- BingoLady
nope |
|
BingoLady
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Ultimate Warrior, NB
Joined: 07.15.2009
|
|
|
WaterBoy
|
|
 |
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT
Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
|
only the one I carry with me all the time 
- Rayven
Being from North Bay I'd say you only carry a tooth pick |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT
Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
|
AH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
- mr.peanut
|
|
habs12
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Cole Harbour, NS
Joined: 04.29.2008
|
|
|
|
The rule itself doesnt say anything about interference from a defender. PK should have gotten a penalty for keeping him pinned in the net if that all resulted the way it did.
Alsom if that is a by-the-book no goal, the book needs to be changed.
- muffin_man
You can take that up with the NHL but as the rule is currently written it's not a goal.
I in no way feel bad for Tampa, sorry. |
|
muffin_man
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: no problem, as s hole - Eric Engels, NY
Joined: 02.10.2007
|
|
|
|
You can take that up with the NHL but as the rule is currently written it's not a goal.
I in no way feel bad for Tampa, sorry.
- habs12
Kerry Fraser @kfraserthecall 29m
Correct call on disallowed goal! 69.3if goalkeeper in act of establishing his position within crease, initiates contact with an attacking |
|
BingoLady
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Ultimate Warrior, NB
Joined: 07.15.2009
|
|
|
|
You can take that up with the NHL but as the rule is currently written it's not a goal.
I in no way feel bad for Tampa, sorry.
- habs12
Agreed |
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Montreal
Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT
Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
|
You can take that up with the NHL but as the rule is currently written it's not a goal.
I in no way feel bad for Tampa, sorry.
- habs12
IT's a goal.. we got lucky.
Point finale. |
|
BingoLady
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Ultimate Warrior, NB
Joined: 07.15.2009
|
|
|
|
Kerry Fraser @kfraserthecall 29m
Correct call on disallowed goal! 69.3if goalkeeper in act of establishing his position within crease, initiates contact with an attacking
- muffin_man
Post in tb thread |
|
muffin_man
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: no problem, as s hole - Eric Engels, NY
Joined: 02.10.2007
|
|
|
|
|
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 8m
Like most, I believe Tampa's goal vs. MTL should not have been disallowed.
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 5m
But as @RonMacLeanCBC and @kfraserthecall pointed out, literal interpretation of rule may've been technically correct. Still don't like it. |
|
BingoLady
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Ultimate Warrior, NB
Joined: 07.15.2009
|
|
|
|
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 8m
Like most, I believe Tampa's goal vs. MTL should not have been disallowed.
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 5m
But as @RonMacLeanCBC and @kfraserthecall pointed out, literal interpretation of rule may've been technically correct. Still don't like it.
- muffin_man
Bobs a Leafs fan |
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal
Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
|
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 8m
Like most, I believe Tampa's goal vs. MTL should not have been disallowed.
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 5m
But as @RonMacLeanCBC and @kfraserthecall pointed out, literal interpretation of rule may've been technically correct. Still don't like it.
- muffin_man
they will have to get ovet it |
|
BingoLady
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Ultimate Warrior, NB
Joined: 07.15.2009
|
|
|
|
they will have to get ovet it
- deadpoulet
Yep spilled milk now. Terrible call to give them 1st goal. |
|
kev1586
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: Earlton, ON
Joined: 04.27.2008
|
|
|
|
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 8m
Like most, I believe Tampa's goal vs. MTL should not have been disallowed.
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 5m
But as @RonMacLeanCBC and @kfraserthecall pointed out, literal interpretation of rule may've been technically correct. Still don't like it.
- muffin_man
Agree with MacKenzie, don't feel sorry for Tampa. |
|
Yeti1181
Referee
Edmonton Oilers |
|
 |
Location: I'm AWESOME, AB
Joined: 07.27.2012
|
|
|
|
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 8m
Like most, I believe Tampa's goal vs. MTL should not have been disallowed.
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie 5m
But as @RonMacLeanCBC and @kfraserthecall pointed out, literal interpretation of rule may've been technically correct. Still don't like it.
- muffin_man
As well know everything in the NHL is black and white  |
|
BashCH
Montreal Canadiens |
|
 |
Location: The legendary Don Cherry agrees with me..., QC
Joined: 04.27.2010
|
|
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal
Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT
Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
habs12
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Cole Harbour, NS
Joined: 04.29.2008
|
|
|
|
Yep spilled milk now. Terrible call to give them 1st goal.
- BingoLady
PLEK!!!!!! |
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: taking the low road
Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
