Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks: Big First Day at the Draft—Change Has Come
Author Message
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Jun 28 @ 12:38 PM ET
Forsling:


I really like Forsling. He is a smaller PMD, really excelled on the PP at the U18s. He and Nylander seem to toy with the opposition with the way they moved the puck. Never hesitates to shoot. Good skater, makes a good first pass. I thought he was the best Swedish D man at the U18s.

I thought he was above average. But obviously not a big guy, not aggressive. Needs more strength in battles and coverage in front of the net. But he is what i'd consider a smart player at both ends of the ice.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Jun 28 @ 12:38 PM ET
The old LA blogger Berry says LA just stole a gem from Canucks
- VANTEL


Yeah, McKeowen was projected as a late 1st/early 2nd dman with 2nd pairing upside.
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Jun 28 @ 12:39 PM ET
What about the rest of the world?
- Nucker101

(frank) the rest of the world
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Jun 28 @ 12:41 PM ET
Kyle Pettit?
- VANTEL


Apparently not a "meat and potatoes" guy, doesn't use his size physically as he should. And here's a quote from someone's who's watched him again:


Didn't like him in the OHL. Limited potential, mostly defensively. I don't know if his puck skills will be enough to get him to the NHL. Good at protecting the puck and plays a very safe game.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Jun 28 @ 12:41 PM ET
(frank) the rest of the world
- LeftCoaster


Sound strategy
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 28 @ 12:41 PM ET
http://blogs.theprovince....a-huge-one/?__federated=1

The big Russian
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 28 @ 12:42 PM ET
Apparently not a "meat and potatoes" guy, doesn't use his size physically as he should. And here's a quote from someone's who's watched him again:
- Nucker101

Thank for the info
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Jun 28 @ 12:42 PM ET
Sound strategy
- Nucker101

these kids in the later rounds don't have much of a chance, but who knows?
therealagent
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 01.15.2012

Jun 28 @ 12:44 PM ET
Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks: Big First Day at the Draft—Change Has Come
The Vancouver Canucks continued their franchise overhaul in earnest on Friday, completing three trades and picking up two new prospects in the first round of the NHL draft.

- Carol Schram


Love the changes and picks so far. More than anything it's change and that's what all of us said we wanted and is what they said they'd do. They're not done but when you look at the youth they have today compared to a couple days ago, it's much more promising.

Bonino, Sbisa, Vey, Demko, Virtanen, McCann, etc., added to Lack, Tanev, Corrado, Kassian, Jensen, BoHo, Shin, Fox, Gaunce, Cassels, Hutton, etc., and there's something to look forward to.

The thing I'm looking most forward to is seeing a tandem of Cederholm and Tryamkin patrolling the blue in the prospects camp. Trymakin is an absolute beast!
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 28 @ 12:46 PM ET
Love the changes and picks so far. More than anything it's change and that's what all of us said we wanted and is what they said they'd do. They're not done but when you look at the youth they have today compared to a couple days ago, it's much more promising.

Bonino, Sbisa, Vey, Demko, Virtanen, McCann, etc., added to Lack, Tanev, Corrado, Kassian, Jensen, BoHo, Shin, Fox, Gaunce, Cassels, Hutton, etc., and there's something to look forward to.

The thing I'm looking most forward to is seeing a tandem of Cederholm and Tryamkin patrolling the blue in the prospects camp. Trymakin is an absolute beast!

- therealagent

he is staying in the KHL for two more years before coming here.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Jun 28 @ 12:50 PM ET
he is staying in the KHL for two more years before coming here.
- VANTEL

Probably for the best.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Jun 28 @ 12:52 PM ET
Thank for the info
- VANTEL


Sounds like a waste of a pick to me from what people have watched him are saying to be honest. Other picks all have some upside though IMO.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 28 @ 12:53 PM ET
http://canucksarmy.com/20...lvr.it&utm_medium=twitter


Canucks Army's write up on our two new D prospects. Exciting
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 28 @ 12:54 PM ET
Sounds like a waste of a pick to me from what people have watched him are saying to be honest. Other picks all have some upside though IMO.
- Nucker101


Trader Jim can make one mistake
DrChristianTroy
Location: 2028 Stanley Cup Champions
Joined: 11.10.2006

Jun 28 @ 12:54 PM ET
Sounds like a waste of a pick to me from what people have watched him are saying to be honest. Other picks all have some upside though IMO.
- Nucker101


Yeah, WTF... A big body who doesn't use it & has zero offensive skill?

Guessing it's the kid of a family friend of Benning's or Desjardins'
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks
Location: Shark City, CA
Joined: 07.03.2009

Jun 28 @ 12:55 PM ET
Sounds like a waste of a pick to me from what people have watched him are saying to be honest. Other picks all have some upside though IMO.
- Nucker101

No such thing, you're absolutely drafting on future potential right now.

About 5 kids out of the last 60 manage to even play 100 NHL games, rarely does a late rounder crack 500 games....RARELY!!!
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Jun 28 @ 1:02 PM ET
Jacob Middleton? For our 7th round pick.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Jun 28 @ 1:02 PM ET
Good to hear . What can you tell us about him?
- VANTEL

Diver, cancer in the room, GF (frank)er? cause we're short in that department now.
Dan&Bob
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 10.24.2005

Jun 28 @ 1:04 PM ET
Lets be very clear about one thing. This so called 'franchise overhaul' that everyone is talking about would NOT be happening if it were up to the Canucks brass.
Benning has made it a little too clear that he would have 'loved' to see Kesler remain. So if Benning had his way, Kesler would still be here and the only guys gone are Booth, Garrison and some prospects. WOW, so much for an overhaul then.
The point is that before we get so excited or so down about Kelser being gone, let's never forget that this was something that the player FORCED the organization to do.
Kesler, by the way, has it right: this team is ways away from winning the cup.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Jun 28 @ 1:07 PM ET
Lets be very clear about one thing. This so called 'franchise overhaul' that everyone is talking about would NOT be happening if it were up to the Canucks brass.
Benning has made it a little too clear that he would have 'loved' to see Kesler remain. So if Benning had his way, Kesler would still be here and the only guys gone are Booth, Garrison and some prospects. WOW, so much for an overhaul then.
The point is that before we get so excited or so down about Kelser being gone, let's never forget that this was something that the player FORCED the organization to do.
Kesler, by the way, has it right: this team is ways away from winning the cup.

- Dan&Bob



You could be right, but he's gone so no point in speculating. Didn't you say that this team was gonna keep all of the core and try to sign a UFA? 2 core players gone so it seems like you're wrong. And according to a poster with supposed "sources" another Canuck players was also asked to waive besides Garisson and it wasn't Edler. Has to be one of Hamhuis, Bieksa or Burrows...my guess is Burrows.


You were wrong.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 28 @ 1:08 PM ET
Lets be very clear about one thing. This so called 'franchise overhaul' that everyone is talking about would NOT be happening if it were up to the Canucks brass.
Benning has made it a little too clear that he would have 'loved' to see Kesler remain. So if Benning had his way, Kesler would still be here and the only guys gone are Booth, Garrison and some prospects. WOW, so much for an overhaul then.
The point is that before we get so excited or so down about Kelser being gone, let's never forget that this was something that the player FORCED the organization to do.
Kesler, by the way, has it right: this team is ways away from winning the cup.

- Dan&Bob

Did you expect Benning to say He is a dirtbag ,now what is your best offer?

I posted a Botchford link earlier in this blog and Benning admitted he was arguing with Keslers Camp twice a day.

He is thrilled that it is over
rugdnit
Location: Flagged and Ignored, CA
Joined: 11.29.2006

Jun 28 @ 1:09 PM ET
Lets be very clear about one thing. This so called 'franchise overhaul' that everyone is talking about would NOT be happening if it were up to the Canucks brass.
Benning has made it a little too clear that he would have 'loved' to see Kesler remain. So if Benning had his way, Kesler would still be here and the only guys gone are Booth, Garrison and some prospects. WOW, so much for an overhaul then.
The point is that before we get so excited or so down about Kelser being gone, let's never forget that this was something that the player FORCED the organization to do.
Kesler, by the way, has it right: this team is ways away from winning the cup.

- Dan&Bob


Are you for real? What GM berates his stock before selling?

The guy did and said all the right things prior to removing the cancer.
ystoil
Edmonton Oilers
Location: Edmonton
Joined: 02.26.2011

Jun 28 @ 1:11 PM ET
Good picks this year in round 1
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 28 @ 1:12 PM ET
Good picks this year in round 1
- ystoil

It went according to Hoyle. No big surprises.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Jun 28 @ 1:14 PM ET
Lets be very clear about one thing. This so called 'franchise overhaul' that everyone is talking about would NOT be happening if it were up to the Canucks brass.
Benning has made it a little too clear that he would have 'loved' to see Kesler remain. So if Benning had his way, Kesler would still be here and the only guys gone are Booth, Garrison and some prospects. WOW, so much for an overhaul then.
The point is that before we get so excited or so down about Kelser being gone, let's never forget that this was something that the player FORCED the organization to do.
Kesler, by the way, has it right: this team is ways away from winning the cup.

- Dan&Bob

Again, I don't know which one of you is the bigger idiot.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next