i have faith that if he doesn't get the deal he wants (or close to it) then he'll keep spezza until the deadline.
nashville offered the same package they did for neal, plus the 11th pick (i think that's where they were picking)......so either spezza is worth quite a bit more than neal, or rutherford is just an idiot........either way......
- sensarmy_11
In no way is this true or does it even make sense...
You are telling me that Poile offered up Hornqvist, Spaling, and the 11th for a guy with one year left on his deal, is 31 years old, and with back issues?
But they offered the same package
minus the 11th pick and got Neal, 27, and two years left on his deal?
I am not arguing that Spezza has more value than Neal, because I absolutely think Spezza is better all around. What I am arguing is that the Spezza deal fell apart but the Neal trade went through and GMs do not talk about who is involved in failed trades (or at least they should not) as it puts the players involved in a bad spot. Poile would not come out and say "Well we offered Roman Josi for Spezza but Spezza vetoed the trade. (You can see how Josi might perceive this).
Since the two players ended up getting traded anyways, is it not plausible that their names were just thrown out there as the players involved in the Spezza trade?
If Poile did offer that trade, then both of our GMs are idiots...