zig, i didn't mean that.
- kicksave856

i'm doing that little wednesday adams dance right now

not as good, but still doing it

i'm doing that little wednesday adams dance right now

not as good, but still doing it
- Shutdown

get down.

i'm doing that little wednesday adams dance right now

not as good, but still doing it
- Shutdown

she really does own it

she really does own it
- Crimsoninja

the arm swing is key here

the arm swing is key here
- kicksave856

i got that down i think

gonna focus on the feet next

she really does own it
- Crimsoninja

effortless

how ambien is still legal

how ambien is still legal
- Crimsoninja

a lot of people just use it as a doctor prescribed sleep aid.

a lot of people just use it as a doctor prescribed sleep aid.
- kicksave856

i do... i mean also as an xbox nhl PED but mostly the first thing

piecing things together in the morning sometimes is like a sherlock holmes episode

like for example today i found my dishwashing liquid bottle on my bathoom sink. i had to walk around finding clues as to how/why it ended up there until each shattered piece of memory eventually resurfaced in my brain

piecing things together in the morning sometimes is like a sherlock holmes episode

like for example today i found my dishwashing liquid bottle on my bathoom sink. i had to walk around finding clues as to how/why it ended up there until each shattered piece of memory eventually resurfaced in my brain
- Crimsoninja

what were the clues. explain in explicit detail

edit: I'm wholly prepared to be underwhelmed. go.

piecing things together in the morning sometimes is like a sherlock holmes episode

like for example today i found my dishwashing liquid bottle on my bathoom sink. i had to walk around finding clues as to how/why it ended up there until each shattered piece of memory eventually resurfaced in my brain
- Crimsoninja

let us consider this a groundswell of interest in your ambien fueled adventures.

- D0PPELGANGER

Humour in humans is thought to be tightly linked structurally and conceptually with the expression of Duchenne laughter1, a genetically predisposed4, 91 and inherently positive emotion that elicits 'genuine' or 'real' smiles92. Derived from the primate relaxed open-mouth play face93, such Duchenne laughter is primarily elicited in situations in which a sudden unexpected change in events occurs within a safe social surrounding. This includes 'rough-and-tumble' play, tickling, physical mishaps and pleasant surprise in infants (for example, a 'peek-a-boo' face expressed by a parent), which are referred to as 'proto-humour' (Ref. 11). By contrast, Duchenne laughter elicited by incongruity-based conceptual humour, primarily in adults, is associated with 'formal' attempts at inducing laughter11. However, proto-humour and Duchenne laughter are often tightly linked with one another. Darwin associated humour with “tickling of the mind” (Ref. 94), and there seems to be a relationship between the propensity to laugh when tickled and to laugh at and use humour (in adults)95. Together, the spontaneous laughter of human infants, tickling and formal adult humour all share what is essentially a phylogenetically and ontogenetically conserved structure and context, referred to asnon-serious social incongruity11.

Despite their evolutionary origin being linked with genetic predispositions, Duchenne laughter and humour are not considered to be completely resistant to modulatory influence. In this context, cultural norms and related learning mechanisms are mentioned as key shaping factors11. A good illustration of such relations is the cultural variation observed in the subject matter of humour, which can vary from toilet- and sex-based humour to political humour and span a wide spectrum of cultural institutions and customs11. Furthermore, it is known that learning processes within different cultures strongly influence the context, frequency, intensity and expression of laughter as a function of display rules and varying norms and customs11. Along these lines, the comparison of three studies investigating the genetic versus environmental components of humour in adult monozygotic versus dizygotic twins from the United Kingdom, Australia and North America is noteworthy96. The principal measure was individual differences in humour expression according to four distinct humour styles, of which two are positive (affiliative and self-enhancing) and two are negative (aggressive and self-defeating). The results revealed that, for studied twins from Australia and the United Kingdom, additive genetic and environmental factors accounted for the variance in all four humour styles. For twins from North America, additive genetic and environmental factors accounted for the variance in the two positive humour styles but not for the two negative humour styles, for which variance was accounted for solely by environmental factors. Such findings probably demonstrate cross-cultural differences in what are deemed to be acceptable uses of humour and suggest that there is more cultural pressure surrounding negative rather than positive humour. However, future studies from different cultures are needed to confirm and extend these findings.
http://www.nature.com/nrn.../n12/box/nrn3566_BX1.html

Humour in humans is thought to be tightly linked structurally and conceptually with the expression of Duchenne laughter1, a genetically predisposed4, 91 and inherently positive emotion that elicits 'genuine' or 'real' smiles92. Derived from the primate relaxed open-mouth play face93, such Duchenne laughter is primarily elicited in situations in which a sudden unexpected change in events occurs within a safe social surrounding. This includes 'rough-and-tumble' play, tickling, physical mishaps and pleasant surprise in infants (for example, a 'peek-a-boo' face expressed by a parent), which are referred to as 'proto-humour' (Ref. 11). By contrast, Duchenne laughter elicited by incongruity-based conceptual humour, primarily in adults, is associated with 'formal' attempts at inducing laughter11. However, proto-humour and Duchenne laughter are often tightly linked with one another. Darwin associated humour with “tickling of the mind” (Ref. 94), and there seems to be a relationship between the propensity to laugh when tickled and to laugh at and use humour (in adults)95. Together, the spontaneous laughter of human infants, tickling and formal adult humour all share what is essentially a phylogenetically and ontogenetically conserved structure and context, referred to asnon-serious social incongruity11.

Despite their evolutionary origin being linked with genetic predispositions, Duchenne laughter and humour are not considered to be completely resistant to modulatory influence. In this context, cultural norms and related learning mechanisms are mentioned as key shaping factors11. A good illustration of such relations is the cultural variation observed in the subject matter of humour, which can vary from toilet- and sex-based humour to political humour and span a wide spectrum of cultural institutions and customs11. Furthermore, it is known that learning processes within different cultures strongly influence the context, frequency, intensity and expression of laughter as a function of display rules and varying norms and customs11. Along these lines, the comparison of three studies investigating the genetic versus environmental components of humour in adult monozygotic versus dizygotic twins from the United Kingdom, Australia and North America is noteworthy96. The principal measure was individual differences in humour expression according to four distinct humour styles, of which two are positive (affiliative and self-enhancing) and two are negative (aggressive and self-defeating). The results revealed that, for studied twins from Australia and the United Kingdom, additive genetic and environmental factors accounted for the variance in all four humour styles. For twins from North America, additive genetic and environmental factors accounted for the variance in the two positive humour styles but not for the two negative humour styles, for which variance was accounted for solely by environmental factors. Such findings probably demonstrate cross-cultural differences in what are deemed to be acceptable uses of humour and suggest that there is more cultural pressure surrounding negative rather than positive humour. However, future studies from different cultures are needed to confirm and extend these findings.
http://www.nature.com/nrn.../n12/box/nrn3566_BX1.html
- Shutdown

ty

piecing things together in the morning sometimes is like a sherlock holmes episode

like for example today i found my dishwashing liquid bottle on my bathoom sink. i had to walk around finding clues as to how/why it ended up there until each shattered piece of memory eventually resurfaced in my brain
- Crimsoninja

i had a friend just like this once.

we found a steak knife between the folded towels in the linen closet once.

*sigh*

how ambien is still legal
- Crimsoninja

i really should just get some of that. never tried it.

http://www.people.com/art...ly-20160515PM-21006663-hd


Local TV Station Asks Meterologist to Cover Up Live On-Air After People Allegedly Complained About Her Bare Shoulders

why it's below freezing.


pretty sick of this global cooling

why it's below freezing.


pretty sick of this global cooling
- dt99999

this is awesome. it's 47 american degrees here on may 16th.

pretending to like cold weather is the worst gimmick. it rattles the (frank) out of me.

pretending to like cold weather is the worst gimmick. it rattles the (frank) out of me.
- daeth

It's why Stamkos would never go from Florida to Toronto

It's why Stamkos would never go from Florida to Toronto
- PhillySportsGuy

amen