no one's arguing scrivens is in price's league. hes not. dude is probably the best goalie in the world.

but the logic and understating scrivens worth has also gotten silly.
he's was solid for us last year. had a couple weak games early this year, and now a couple of very strong games. he's not our long term solution by any means. but its adequate for now
- hugefemale dog77

Lundqvist > Quick > Price > Rask

If you have any UFAS coming up they need to move them at the deadline and then maybe move the picks to get roster players.

Calgary did not trade Cammalleri last season and that was dumb.
- deadpoulet

I'm sure they tried

Lundqvist > Quick > Price > Rask
- tkecanuck341

This.....

Lundqvist > Quick > Price > Rask
- tkecanuck341

Ballsy not adding Scrivens in the top 5 in an Oilers thread... they're going to flame you for not recognizing him as an equal to Patrick Roy

I like how you completely ignored the proposal I suggested and got all huffy puffy because I said the game was boring. Do you believe that Marchand would be a great addition to the Oilers or not? It's not that hard.

It is a beautiful thing that I get that choice. Thank you for reminding me. Next time I get the chance to watch the Oilers I'll make sure to login here immediately when the game starts so I can remind you how horrible the team during the 60minutes of boring time.
- RazzDazzle

I'm sure that'll make u feel great!
Abit sad and pathetic, but I won't judge.
I can't guarantee that I'll be here tho. I generally don't advance plan my nights around trolling hockeybuzz. I think the next game is on a Friday just so u can prepare bro.


As far as ur idea on what the oilers need. Are u surprised I didn't reply? Did I give u the impression that I value your opinion enough to respond on ur thoughts about hockey? Apologies.
Let me be clear. I don't. At all

I'm sure that'll make u feel great!
Abit sad and pathetic, but I won't judge.
I can't guarantee that I'll be here tho. I generally don't advance plan my nights around trolling hockeybuzz. I think the next game is on a Friday just so u can prepare bro.


As far as ur idea on what the oilers need. Are u surprised I didn't reply? Did I give u the impression that I value your opinion enough to respond on ur thoughts about hockey? Apologies I'll be clear. I don't. At all
- hugefemale dog77

He's sensitive

I'm sure that'll make u feel great!
Abit sad and pathetic, but I won't judge.
I can't guarantee that I'll be here tho. I generally don't advance plan my nights around trolling hockeybuzz. I think the next game is on a Friday just so u can prepare bro.


As far as ur idea on what the oilers need. Are u surprised I didn't reply? Did I give u the impression that I value your opinion enough to respond on ur thoughts about hockey? Apologies I'll be clear. I don't. At all
- hugefemale dog77

Ballsy not adding Scrivens in the top 5 in an Oilers thread... they're going to flame you for not recognizing him as an equal to Patrick Roy
- RazzDazzle

your so pathetic.... Get a life....

I'm sure they tried
- numbear

Should have been a sign or trade in my opinion. Mtl has made that mistake before as well, so it's not like if it's just Calgary.

I'm sure that'll make u feel great!
Abit sad and pathetic, but I won't judge.
I can't guarantee that I'll be here tho. I generally don't advance plan my nights around trolling hockeybuzz. I think the next game is on a Friday just so u can prepare bro.


As far as ur idea on what the oilers need. Are u surprised I didn't reply? Did I give u the impression that I value your opinion enough to respond on ur thoughts about hockey? Apologies. I'll be clear. I don't. At all
- hugefemale dog77

2 points for hugefemale dog....

Lundqvist > Quick > Price > Rask
- tkecanuck341

I'd take quick and price over lundqvist.

Hank has certainly been consistently good for the longest (he's much older tho) but I just feel on the tops of their games, price and quick are virtually unbeatable

He's sensitive
- numbear

He's a douche.

An angry, sad little man


Who the eff are these people?
How do they get like that? It's so fuking weird.

I'm sure that'll make u feel great!
Abit sad and pathetic, but I won't judge.
I can't guarantee that I'll be here tho. I generally don't advance plan my nights around trolling hockeybuzz. I think the next game is on a Friday just so u can prepare bro.


As far as ur idea on what the oilers need. Are u surprised I didn't reply? Did I give u the impression that I value your opinion enough to respond on ur thoughts about hockey? Apologies I'll be clear. I don't. At all
- hugefemale dog77

I'm sure it'll give me a little pick me during another 'shoot me now' feeling while I watch the Oilers play.

Seems like it's your lucky day today! Oilers luckily win their 2nd game and since I won't be able to make Friday's game you likely won't miss the entertainment.


lol I wasn't surprised you didn't reply... The Oilers and all the Oilers fans seem to be a bit lost. You female dog about all the trade proposals and don't have any solid ideas of your own. You just hate on everyone and throw your jerseys on the ice. I was hoping since Montreal was involved in this thread that there would actually be some intelligent conversation happening... but since you and Thug Life are the only one blasting away on here, I guess not.

He's a douche.

An angry, sad little man


Who the eff are these people?
How do they get like that? It's so fuking weird.
- hugefemale dog77

Who's angry?? I said the game was boring.. you were the one that got all uptight.

seems like a lot of work for such little result.

I'd take quick and price over lundqvist.

Hank has certainly been consistently good for the longest (he's much older tho) but I just feel on the tops of their games, price and quick are virtually unbeatable
- hugefemale dog77

quick sure, I would go hank over price though. Pretty close for all 3 when they are on top of their games though.

Who's angry?? I said the game was boring.. you were the one that got all uptight.
- RazzDazzle

K

quick sure, I would go hank over price though. Pretty close for all 3 when they are on top of their games though.
- numbear

Agree to disagree.

But they are all pretty great.

I just think of price against Boston last year. Ridiculous.
I'm sold on him

Agree to disagree.

And they are all pretty great.

I just think of price against Boston last year. Ridiculous.
Lots of revisionist stuff after that series. While it's true Mtl played a smart, counterpunch game, they were outplayed in 5/7 games. A couple of em badly. But price stole that series. He was in their head
- hugefemale dog77

the stealing games angle is definitely why quick is the top of those names.

the stealing games angle is definitely why quick is the top of those names.
- numbear

I don't think he's stolen more over the last couple years.
But certainly put in a position to steal bigger games cause his team is also head and shoulders better than price 's.
Their defensive style is practically impregnable.
I don't wanna take anything away from quick. He's so good. Stole the nucks series in their first cup run.
But it's also no coincedence that Martin jones and Ben Scrivens put up disgusting numbers behind that team

If Subban or Price are involved, then forget about it unless the Oilers add to the trade. If it is for Pacioretty or Galchenyuk, the Habs have better not to add to that.

I like how you completely ignored the proposal I suggested and got all huffy puffy because I said the game was boring. Do you believe that Marchand would be a great addition to the Oilers or not? It's not that hard.

It is a beautiful thing that I get that choice. Thank you for reminding me. Next time I get the chance to watch the Oilers I'll make sure to login here immediately when the game starts so I can remind you how horrible the team during the 60minutes of boring time.
- RazzDazzle

Maybe he ignored your trade proposal because of you're idiotic comment you followed it with.....

....it's not that hard a concept if you want to engage people in serious hockey conversation. Rule number 1 is ' don't be a Richard' .
This is a basic social skill you can use is the real world as well.

I saw people talking about swapping max pac for Eberle. Call me crazy, but does this trade pretty much accomplish nothing? A goal scorer for a goal scorer? I try to follow most teams but the seasons kinda early and maybe I'm out of the loop?

Maybe he ignored your trade proposal because of you're idiotic comment you followed it with.....

....it's not that hard a concept if you want to engage people in serious hockey conversation. Rule number 1 is ' don't be a Richard' .
This is a basic social skill you can use is the real world as well.
- Jeropotato

I miss me some Richy Clouts...

As far as ur idea on what the oilers need. Are u surprised I didn't reply? Did I give u the impression that I value your opinion enough to respond on ur thoughts about hockey? Apologies.
Let me be clear. I don't. At all
- hugefemale dog77