i think he'd look good with a single digit, i believe 6 and 9 are available, make it happen
- monty burns

put them together

im so glad we never traded the poor man's jagr ++ for bobby ryan

im so glad we never traded the poor man's jagr ++ for bobby ryan
- JoeRussomanno

Yeah, we have some dumbass people in here....

Laughton

Some free flow thought here from the collection of past posts

Laughton took longer than Matta to make the roster and contribute, so he sucks

before this game, SL h as played well. Well enough for people to sat TRADE Coots, Laughton can do everything he does....

Coots has 7 points in last 6 games.......head explodes
- KINGKENZO

By Leon Wieseltier

The most common understanding of disagreement, in the private sphere and the public one, that it represents a failure. A single understanding, a shared understanding, is preferred to a multiplicity of understandings, which is rejected as an epistemologically fallen condition. We begin with many, but we aspire to one: The grip of the holistic fantasy is profound. Disagreement is a kind of fragmentation, but we wish to be made whole. The many factors that are responsible for intellectual disharmony—rhetorical, conceptual, psychological, cultural, political—are regarded pejoratively as impediments that need to be refuted or discarded, as obstacles in the way of a higher arrangement. That higher arrangement is consensus. Who does not prefer consensus to conflict? Is quarrelsomeness not a vice? Surely a quarrel is a kind of conflict, a state of affairs in need of correction. A quarrel demands resolution and reconciliation. To see things differently is to surrender to difference, whereas sameness or similarity of perspective brings us closer and even unites us. The dream of intellectual concord is also a dream of social concord. The abolition of disagreement, when it is not coerced, is a promise of union and peace.

a book review that sort of applies to us here

By Leon Wieseltier

The most common understanding of disagreement, in the private sphere and the public one, that it represents a failure. A single understanding, a shared understanding, is preferred to a multiplicity of understandings, which is rejected as an epistemologically fallen condition. We begin with many, but we aspire to one: The grip of the holistic fantasy is profound. Disagreement is a kind of fragmentation, but we wish to be made whole. The many factors that are responsible for intellectual disharmony—rhetorical, conceptual, psychological, cultural, political—are regarded pejoratively as impediments that need to be refuted or discarded, as obstacles in the way of a higher arrangement. That higher arrangement is consensus. Who does not prefer consensus to conflict? Is quarrelsomeness not a vice? Surely a quarrel is a kind of conflict, a state of affairs in need of correction. A quarrel demands resolution and reconciliation. To see things differently is to surrender to difference, whereas sameness or similarity of perspective brings us closer and even unites us. The dream of intellectual concord is also a dream of social concord. The abolition of disagreement, when it is not coerced, is a promise of union and peace.
- Marc D

By Jeffrey "The Dude" Lebowski

"The Dude Abides."

By Leon Wieseltier

The most common understanding of disagreement, in the private sphere and the public one, that it represents a failure. A single understanding, a shared understanding, is preferred to a multiplicity of understandings, which is rejected as an epistemologically fallen condition. We begin with many, but we aspire to one: The grip of the holistic fantasy is profound. Disagreement is a kind of fragmentation, but we wish to be made whole. The many factors that are responsible for intellectual disharmony—rhetorical, conceptual, psychological, cultural, political—are regarded pejoratively as impediments that need to be refuted or discarded, as obstacles in the way of a higher arrangement. That higher arrangement is consensus. Who does not prefer consensus to conflict? Is quarrelsomeness not a vice? Surely a quarrel is a kind of conflict, a state of affairs in need of correction. A quarrel demands resolution and reconciliation. To see things differently is to surrender to difference, whereas sameness or similarity of perspective brings us closer and even unites us. The dream of intellectual concord is also a dream of social concord. The abolition of disagreement, when it is not coerced, is a promise of union and peace.

a book review that sort of applies to us here
- Marc D

philosobuzz

What a beauty

What a beauty


- ob18

Some moron I know really likes him, bought a Oshawa jersey

What a beauty


- ob18

A long time ago there was another significant player from the Generals on the Flyers,
the Big E

Some moron I know really likes him, bought a Oshawa jersey
- Jsaquella

- ob18

I thought you got a blue one

I thought you got a blue one
- Jsaquella

Briefly thought about it, but no.

By Leon Wieseltier

The most common understanding of disagreement, in the private sphere and the public one, that it represents a failure. A single understanding, a shared understanding, is preferred to a multiplicity of understandings, which is rejected as an epistemologically fallen condition. We begin with many, but we aspire to one: The grip of the holistic fantasy is profound. Disagreement is a kind of fragmentation, but we wish to be made whole. The many factors that are responsible for intellectual disharmony—rhetorical, conceptual, psychological, cultural, political—are regarded pejoratively as impediments that need to be refuted or discarded, as obstacles in the way of a higher arrangement. That higher arrangement is consensus. Who does not prefer consensus to conflict? Is quarrelsomeness not a vice? Surely a quarrel is a kind of conflict, a state of affairs in need of correction. A quarrel demands resolution and reconciliation. To see things differently is to surrender to difference, whereas sameness or similarity of perspective brings us closer and even unites us. The dream of intellectual concord is also a dream of social concord. The abolition of disagreement, when it is not coerced, is a promise of union and peace.

a book review that sort of applies to us here
- Marc D

http://dictionary.referen...om/browse/epistemological


not going to lie, i had to look this up.......i posted it for the rest of you egomaniacs that would just skip over the word

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/epistemological


not going to lie, i had to look this up.......i posted it for the rest of you egomaniacs that would just skip over the word

- KINGKENZO

99% of us never read the whole thing.

99% of us never read the whole thing.
- Jsaquella

Big words make brain hurt

- Jsaquella

hell yea scorevalcek where is carter at

When the Flyers get scored on the PK and you see Luke Schenn and Nicolas Grossmann out there together on the ice, I have to ask why those two are paired together to begin with.

When the Flyers get scored on the PK and you see Luke Schenn and Nicolas Grossmann out there together on the ice, I have to ask why those two are paired together to begin with.
- SuperSchennBros

practice

hell yea scorevalcek where is carter at
- 2Real

He can't hear you on the count his two championship rings are plugging his ears.

He can't hear you on the count his two championship rings are plugging his ears.
- Yosimar89

oh i'm sorry carter was just there to pad his stats

All Flyers forwards had between 12-17 minutes today. Thats the key to success. Play Giroux and Jake less; play VDV and Rinaldo more.

- Giroux_Is_God