Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks Game Day: Feb. 5 vs. San Jose Sharks
Author Message
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Feb 6 @ 1:59 PM ET
So they should be. We hope Virtanen can become the player that Kane is (without the drama). If they can acquire Kane without giving up Horvat, Virtanen or this year's 1st round pick then they should send everything else they have the Jets way. Likelihood of this happening, about the same as me winning the 6/49 (haven't bought a ticket in 10 years...)
- 1970vintage


We are keeping McCann...

Maybe send Shink or Cassels?

I am not sure if they want another goalie with Pavelic and Hutchinson there...
Linden_4_Capt
Vancouver Canucks
Location: ON
Joined: 01.23.2014

Feb 6 @ 2:00 PM ET
Kassian, Lack & Higgins should get it done.
Package!

- Marwood

1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 6 @ 2:03 PM ET
We are keeping McCann...

Maybe send Shink or Cassels?

I am not sure if they want another goalie with Pavelic and Hutchinson there...

- hillbillydeluxe


If the cost was McCann, Hansen and Lack and a 2nd and Jensen and Cassels and whatever the fak else, I'd do that in a heartbeat.

EDIT - Dane Fox on his own should get it done...
The_Kuze
Joined: 01.26.2012

Feb 6 @ 2:04 PM ET
Hunter Shinkaruk, Niklas Jensen, Lack or MArkstrom, Zack Kassian

for

E Kane



The_Kuze
Joined: 01.26.2012

Feb 6 @ 2:05 PM ET
If the cost was McCann, Hansen and Lack and a 2nd and Jensen and Cassels and whatever the fak else, I'd do that in a heartbeat.

EDIT - Dane Fox on his own should get it done...

- 1970vintage


MacCann goes nowhere
classic321
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.04.2012

Feb 6 @ 2:06 PM ET
If the cost was McCann, Hansen and Lack and a 2nd and Jensen and Cassels and whatever the fak else, I'd do that in a heartbeat.

EDIT - Dane Fox on his own should get it done...

- 1970vintage


Just to be sure I have this right.

McCann
Hansen
Lack
2nd round pick
Jensen
Cassels

You're not serious???
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Feb 6 @ 2:06 PM ET
Jason Botchford @botchford .

Looks like no Hamhuis for Canucks practice

No Higgins either...
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 6 @ 2:07 PM ET
MacCann goes nowhere
- The_Kuze


Kane > McCann
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Feb 6 @ 2:08 PM ET
Kane > McCann
- 1970vintage


McCann might be the prospect closest to filling the first line c position in the system... not ideally, but the best we have.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 6 @ 2:09 PM ET
Just to be sure I have this right.

McCann
Hansen
Lack
2nd round pick
Jensen
Cassels

You're not serious???

- classic321


Dude, all the other stuff (Jensen, Cassels, 2nd etc.) doesn't matter. It's all replaceable. If you could acquire an impact, top 6 forward without giving up your two blue chip prospects and this year's first round pick its worth it. Volume would never get a deal done, the Jets will want quality, and there's not a whole lot of that in the system.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 6 @ 2:10 PM ET
McCann might be the prospect closest to filling the first line c position in the system... not ideally, but the best we have.
- hillbillydeluxe


Maybe, in four or five more years, maybe.
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Feb 6 @ 2:10 PM ET
Jason Botchford @botchford .

Looks like no Hamhuis for Canucks practice

No Higgins either...

- hillbillydeluxe


Go for surgery Hammer so we can pick top ten!!!!

1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 6 @ 2:11 PM ET
Jason Botchford @botchford .

Looks like no Hamhuis for Canucks practice

No Higgins either...

- hillbillydeluxe


...trade
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC
Joined: 05.29.2014

Feb 6 @ 2:12 PM ET
Jason Botchford @botchford .

Looks like no Hamhuis for Canucks practice

No Higgins either...

- hillbillydeluxe

LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Feb 6 @ 2:12 PM ET
...trade
- 1970vintage


Higgins to PIT?

LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Feb 6 @ 2:12 PM ET

- bezz44


bezz44
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC
Joined: 05.29.2014

Feb 6 @ 2:13 PM ET
Dude, all the other stuff (Jensen, Cassels, 2nd etc.) doesn't matter. It's all replaceable. If you could acquire an impact, top 6 forward without giving up your two blue chip prospects and this year's first round pick its worth it. Volume would never get a deal done, the Jets will want quality, and there's not a whole lot of that in the system.
- 1970vintage

It isn't as if Kane doesn't have his own question marks about him. That's a lot of quantity to give up for a guy who doesn't seem to be a positive asset to have on a team
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun, AZ
Joined: 07.03.2009

Feb 6 @ 2:14 PM ET
Hunter Shinkaruk, Niklas Jensen, Lack or MArkstrom, Zack Kassian

for

E Kane

- The_Kuze

Too much!!
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Feb 6 @ 2:14 PM ET
Maybe, in four or five more years, maybe.
- 1970vintage


Still don't want to part with McCann... unless we are able to pick up a better centre option with this year's first rounder...

I know you have to give to get in a trade, but we are really lacking in top 6 potential and don't have anyone in the system beyond McCann and Horvat that look like they could potentially play centre in the top 6... and I am sure people would say that is still reaching with these guys.
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Feb 6 @ 2:15 PM ET
Higgins to PIT?


- LordHumungous

Please!!!
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun, AZ
Joined: 07.03.2009

Feb 6 @ 2:16 PM ET
Please!!!
- Marwood

Beatle_john
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Corner of Kirk Maclean's Toe and Robert Reichel's face.
Joined: 01.09.2006

Feb 6 @ 2:18 PM ET
So everyone understands that we really have no chance at the cup this year.... right?

So why not make a move on Kane?

Against:

1. The team may miss out of playoff revenue in a year when the Canadian Dollar fell and their sellouts have been few and far between.

For:

1. You begin to establish a new 1st line allowing the Sedins to become the 2nd line.

2. You get some value for next year and lose possibly Higgins and Kassian in the process.


So:

The trade would have to be bigger than Kassian + Higgins or Burrows as we woudl likely need a top 6 player to just hold down the fort until the end of this season as well...


I am "Go for it" --- Top 3 players do not come around often, hometown ones even less.
Beatle_john
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Corner of Kirk Maclean's Toe and Robert Reichel's face.
Joined: 01.09.2006

Feb 6 @ 2:20 PM ET
Higgins to PIT?


- LordHumungous


They would never take him....


I cannot imagine a market for Higgins.
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Feb 6 @ 2:20 PM ET

- LeftCoaster



Elliott Pap @ElliottPap
· 15m 15 minutes ago
Nux start practice at UBC without 2, 8, 26, 20, 15. #Canucks





Tim Campbell
‏@FPTimCampbell "That would be a question for Evander." Maurice on the co-incidence of dressing room incident and choice of surgery. #NHLJets #bn

bezz44
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC
Joined: 05.29.2014

Feb 6 @ 2:24 PM ET
So everyone understands that we really have no chance at the cup this year.... right?

So why not make a move on Kane?

Against:

1. The team may miss out of playoff revenue in a year when the Canadian Dollar fell and their sellouts have been few and far between.

For:

1. You begin to establish a new 1st line allowing the Sedins to become the 2nd line.

2. You get some value for next year and lose possibly Higgins and Kassian in the process.


So:

The trade would have to be bigger than Kassian + Higgins or Burrows as we woudl likely need a top 6 player to just hold down the fort until the end of this season as well...


I am "Go for it" --- Top 3 players do not come around often, hometown ones even less.

- Beatle_john

You are misrepresenting the Against category.

Reasons not to go for Kane:
It will likely cost us one or more of our best prospects, of which we have a dearth
He has 1 season out of 6 where he has cracked 20 goals and has never played a full 82 games
He has a history of maturity and locker room issues

Also Evander Kane is not a bonafide 1st line player. On a good team he is a second liner
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20  Next