you better let Murray know that
- SABRES 89

We also are NOT Tanking right??

I see no star power at the forward position. 5m is what your gonna
get in a player like Moulson.

Forwards Pos 2014-15
Matt Moulson LW
5,000,000
Tyler Ennis C
4,600,000
Cody Hodgson C
4,250,000
Brian Gionta RW
4,250,000
Chris Stewart RW
4,150,000
Drew Stafford RW
4,000,000
Torrey Mitchell C
1,900,000
Marcus Foligno LW
1,875,000
Cody McCormick C
1,500,000
Patrick Kaleta RW
1,250,000
Zemgus Girgensons C
894,167
Brian Flynn RW
637,500
Nicolas Deslauriers LW
637,500
Phil Varone C
586,667
Matt Ellis LW
550,000
- cabin

don't waste your time, they hate Moulson but love Hodgson

Moulson is a proven goal scorer, JT or no JT.
- SABRES 89

Fun fact:

Moulson has 6 more goals than Hodgson...

I hope you don;t expect us to be good next year. Because we arn't going to be. They are too young to help but we arn't ready to be good anyways.
- Cheeseballin

Me thinks we will be waaaaay better next year. Rebuild ends this summer.

We also are NOT Tanking right??
- Cheeseballin

In case you missed it and you have, I said it before I did say they wouldn't tank and Nolan wouldn't let them. I don't run from my comments if i'm wrong.

The correlation is, Karlsson plays/played on a team with pretty pitiful offensive stats, too. So, stop making excuses for Myers.

He doesn't need a white knight to come and defend his honor everytime someone has a different opinion of him than you. The cat is good, yes. He's no (frank)ing Ray Bourque, Erik Karlsson or even Rob Blake. Heck, on the other end of the spectrum, he's no Rod Langway, Ken Morrow or Mike Ramsey, either.

Again, he's good. He's not great. He's not an all-star. He's no Olympian. Physically he's getting better, but he's no intimidator out there.

He's a nice package of skill, size and reach. What makes him desirable is that package (6'8", skates like he's 5'8"), but he's not untouchable, nor should he be.

If Murray receives an offer for Myers that will improve this team, he should take it.
- grand-magus

The Sens offense and Sabre offense should never be compared.

Bobby Ryan
Jason Spezza
Daniel Alfredsson

Those three there are better than any player the Sabres have had

Fun fact:

Moulson has 6 more goals than Hodgson...
- Cheeseballin

Still 6 more, the whole team is bad and even if it wan't, Hodgson would still be lost.

The Sens offense and Sabre offense should never be compared.

Bobby Ryan
Jason Spezza
Daniel Alfredsson

Those three there are better than any player the Sabres have had
- sbroads24

2 of those guys are gone and one has been gone for 2 years

Me thinks we will be waaaaay better next year. Rebuild ends this summer.
- cabin

Hope you are right. Realisically I don't see how that is possible. Too young, crappy vets arn't going to get you far.

2 of those guys are gone and one has been gone for 2 years
- SABRES 89

I'm aware of this... The Sens have made the playoffs 3 times over the past 5 years. The Sabres have been the worst team in hockey over the last 3.

Still 6 more, the whole team is bad and even if it wan't, Hodgson would still be lost.
- SABRES 89

Not a great defence of Moulson there. I give you props for trying to defend him though.

Not a great defence of Moulson there. I give you props for trying to defend him though.
- Cheeseballin

Moulson shouldn't be in the same sentence as Hogson.

Not a great defence of Moulson there. I give you props for trying to defend him though.
- Cheeseballin

3 Drew Stafford BUF R 48 8 15 23 -20 39 2 5 0 1 1 0 87 9.2 15:57 19.6 50.0
4 Matt Moulson BUF L 50 8 14 22 -15 2 1 7 0 0 2 0 96 8.3 17:14 20.6 83.3

The Sens offense and Sabre offense should never be compared.

Bobby Ryan
Jason Spezza
Daniel Alfredsson

Those three there are better than any player the Sabres have had
- sbroads24

My post just wasn't all about offense.

And Vanek and Pominville were no slouches.

Moulson shouldn't be in the same sentence as Hogson.
- SABRES 89

Hodge 14th on the Sabres for points

Moulson 4th

3 Drew Stafford BUF R 48 8 15 23 -20 39 2 5 0 1 1 0 87 9.2 15:57 19.6 50.0
4 Matt Moulson BUF L 50 8 14 22 -15 2 1 7 0 0 2 0 96 8.3 17:14 20.6 83.3
- cabin

Yes they both suck. What is your point?

Moulson shouldn't be in the same sentence as Hogson.
- SABRES 89

Seeing as he has only 6 more goals than Hodgson. For a proven goal scorer Moulson isn't doing to well is he?

Seeing as he has only 6 more goals than Hodgson. For a proven goal scorer Moulson isn't doing to well is he?
- Cheeseballin

You do have a point. Since Girgs 14, Ennis 13 are leading the team in goals.

And there you are
- Irish 14

And there you are.

Seeing as he has only 6 more goals than Hodgson. For a proven goal scorer Moulson isn't doing to well is he?
- Cheeseballin

The whole team isn't doing good, what's your point.

The whole team isn't doing good, what's your point.
- SABRES 89

More Kaleta. He has the glue!

The whole team isn't doing good, what's your point.
- SABRES 89

As being a vet and a proven goal scorer and the top line winger on this team. Moulson should at least have more than 8 goals on the year and not be behind Drew freaking Stafford in points! And how can you blame hodgson if you are goig to use that excuse for Moulson.

More Kaleta. He has the glue!



- Maximum Signal

If only he had a bit more talent.

As being a vet and a proven goal scorer and the top line winger on this team. Moulson should at least have more than 8 goals on the year and not be behind Drew freaking Stafford in points! And how can you blame hodgson if you are goig to use that excuse for Moulson.
- Cheeseballin

as should Hodgson as our number 1 center now shouldn't he.

as should Hodgson as our number 1 center now shouldn't he.
- SABRES 89

Yes. So be fair. If you are going to use the "whole team is no good" excuse. Let it apply to everyone not just Moulson.