In 1978 I saw ACDC open for Foreigner in the Rochester War Memorial. My buddy stole a bunch of airplane serving whiskey bottles from his father's stash, and we split 5 or 6 of them. I puked on the people in front of me.
McEichel with Reinhart and Girgensons makes me think we don't need RoR - Stripes77
But it also affords them the "cushion" to make risky trades (not necessarily for ROR but since he's the nom du jour) because of how deep they could be at centre. They could stick an average set of wingers and they'd look good.
I watched Kiko play every game 2 seasons ago....he was dynamic...he was also runner up for defensive rookie of the year...at a position the bills lacked a great player for years at...and now he's gone...for a running back that could have been replaced another route.
I can totally understand Rex wanting his guys...but why wouldn't he want a potential all pro player? And what "reports" do you speak of? Why would he want him gone from day 1 as you say...that makes zero sense.
And billieve you me...after 15 years of this crap...freak outs are acceptable. - siket71
I think we all need a little of Aaron Rodgers R-E-L-A-X
McEichel with Reinhart and Girgensons makes me think we don't need RoR - Stripes77
ROR, McEichel, Reinhart and Girgensons. ROR has played wing, and I think Reinhart would be great on the right wing. If Ennis and Freakorenko go the other way for ROR, then we are out a C anyway. But if we don't get ROR, we have Ennis, Freakorenko, Girgensons, McEichel, Reinhart anyway and Girgensons is basically turning into a ROR type of player anyway. I hate the saying too many cooks in the kitchen because there are 12 forward spots on a team. Top-6 should be a top-6 no matter what and a C can always convert to the wing.
Location: We need a You're an Ass button, NY Joined: 09.07.2006
Mar 5 @ 5:37 PM ET
ROR, McEichel, Reinhart and Girgensons. ROR has played wing, and I think Reinhart would be great on the right wing. If Ennis and Freakorenko go the other way for ROR, then we are out a C anyway. But if we don't get ROR, we have Ennis, Freakorenko, Girgensons, McEichel, Reinhart anyway and Girgensons is basically turning into a ROR type of player anyway. I hate the saying too many cooks in the kitchen because there are 12 forward spots on a team. Top-6 should be a top-6 no matter what and a C can always convert to the wing. - DynamicThreads
We could end up with a top 9. 3 freakin scoring lines !!!!!!!!! (now i'm starting to breathe heavy.)
Location: I'm very Happy to be here. Las Vegas Via Buffalo N.Y. Joined: 02.17.2007
Mar 5 @ 5:41 PM ET
ROR, McEichel, Reinhart and Girgensons. ROR has played wing, and I think Reinhart would be great on the right wing. If Ennis and Freakorenko go the other way for ROR, then we are out a C anyway. But if we don't get ROR, we have Ennis, Freakorenko, Girgensons, McEichel, Reinhart anyway and Girgensons is basically turning into a ROR type of player anyway. I hate the saying too many cooks in the kitchen because there are 12 forward spots on a team. Top-6 should be a top-6 no matter what and a C can always convert to the wing. - DynamicThreads
They won't include Ennis, the AVS can't pay him and McKinnon, that's why ROR might be traded.