Scabeh
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: The Slovakian Jagr, QC Joined: 02.25.2007
|
|
|
3-on-3 is dumb. Just make the OT 10 minutes of 4 on 4. - 3M
That's what they're doing in the AHL right now.
70% of games didn't require the shootout with longer OT.
Maybe they think 30% of games resulting in the shootout is still too much? |
|
nords21
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: San Francisco, CA Joined: 03.24.2014
|
|
|
I want to see a 3 on 2 if there's a penalty, instead of adding a guy on the other side. - hscesq
Or they could just pull both goalies and play 5on5 for 5 minutes, most goals scored wins. We'd be a lock with Pac... nvm. |
|
DoubleDown
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Not to point any fingers but Tyson Barrie has looked awful in the blue and white for the Leafs., QC Joined: 07.28.2006
|
|
|
That's why it's dumb. 3 on 3 is the minimum number of skaters per team, so penalties change the entire concept of 3 on 3. - 3M
3 on 3 will be as ridiculous as the shootout |
|
3M
|
|
|
Location: Antigua Joined: 06.30.2009
|
|
|
That's what they're doing in the AHL right now.
70% of games didn't require the shootout with longer OT.
Maybe they think 30% of games resulting in the shootout is still too much? - Scabeh
It was 78% ending before a shootout. And that's all well and good, but as Howard pointed out, when penalties enter the mix, it's no longer 3 on 3. |
|
DoubleDown
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Not to point any fingers but Tyson Barrie has looked awful in the blue and white for the Leafs., QC Joined: 07.28.2006
|
|
|
Or they could just pull both goalies and play 5on5 for 5 minutes, most goals scored wins. We'd be a lock with Pac... nvm. - nords21
5 on 5 sudden death but you need to score from the blueline in |
|
|
|
Or they could just pull both goalies and play 5on5 for 5 minutes, most goals scored wins. We'd be a lock with Pac... nvm. - nords21
|
|
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes |
|
|
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK Joined: 09.21.2009
|
|
|
3 on 3 will be as ridiculous as the shootout - DoubleDown
People upset that the shootout is a gimmick will be upset that 3-on-3 is a gimmick. |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
People upset that the shootout is a gimmick will be upset that 3-on-3 is a gimmick. - BINGO!
Shut up. |
|
DoubleDown
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Not to point any fingers but Tyson Barrie has looked awful in the blue and white for the Leafs., QC Joined: 07.28.2006
|
|
|
People upset that the shootout is a gimmick will be upset that 3-on-3 is a gimmick. - BINGO!
bring back the tie. i don't recall anyone ever complaining about ties. ties were just. |
|
|
|
It was 78% ending before a shootout. And that's all well and good, but as Howard pointed out, when penalties enter the mix, it's no longer 3 on 3. - 3M
Just shows how (frank)ed up the NHL is...it gives us the shootout, but then finds a way to limit the number of times it decides a game...
3-on-3 is even dumber than the shootout. And what's so terribly wrong with a tie that we have to have half-baked ideas to eliminate them?
If ties MUST be eliminated, then:
- 60 minute game, followed by a 3 or 5 player shootout.
- if the NHL wants 4-on-4 to open up the ice, change the rules so that penalties DON'T offset...
- Playoffs continue as is... |
|
stinger67
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: QC Joined: 07.03.2008
|
|
|
bring back the tie. i don't recall anyone ever complaining about ties. ties were just. - DoubleDown
No. |
|
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes |
|
|
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK Joined: 09.21.2009
|
|
|
Shut up. - hscesq
This seems uncalled for. |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
bring back the tie. i don't recall anyone ever complaining about ties. ties were just. - DoubleDown
When you're 60-8-12, the ties don't really matter. |
|
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes |
|
|
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK Joined: 09.21.2009
|
|
|
bring back the tie. i don't recall anyone ever complaining about ties. ties were just. - DoubleDown
I hate them. HATE ties. I mean, we already have them, but still... |
|
|
|
3 on 3 will be as ridiculous as the shootout - DoubleDown
I think it's actually worse...
|
|
3M
|
|
|
Location: Antigua Joined: 06.30.2009
|
|
|
3 on 3 will be as ridiculous as the shootout - DoubleDown
Yep. But it doesn't solve the whole problem with 3-point games. If losing in extra time is treated as "better" than losing in regulation, why is winning in regulation treated the same as winning in extra time?
Just have 3 pts available for every game. If the game goes past 60 minutes, award 2 to the winner and 1 to the loser. |
|
pete26
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Maple MAGA, ON Joined: 11.20.2008
|
|
|
Why not just leave it the way it is?
|
|
3M
|
|
|
Location: Antigua Joined: 06.30.2009
|
|
|
bring back the tie. i don't recall anyone ever complaining about ties. ties were just. - DoubleDown
Uhmuricans complained about ties. They can't wrap their minds around the idea that a game ended without a winner.
Baseball has no ties. Basketball has no ties. Have you seen them trip poop when there's a tie in the NFL? |
|
_nay_
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: "aaaargh my leg!!!" -Max Pacioretty Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: THIS BLOG SUCKS!, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
Why not just leave it the way it is? - pete26
Because |
|
BINGO!
Carolina Hurricanes |
|
|
Location: I'll always remember the last words my grandfather ever told me. He said, "A Truck!", SK Joined: 09.21.2009
|
|
|
Why not just leave it the way it is? - pete26
Exactly.
Not sure why it needs to change. |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
Because - WaterBoy
I agree. |
|
stinger67
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: QC Joined: 07.03.2008
|
|
|
Exactly.
Not sure why it needs to change. - BINGO!
Because shootouts give old dinosaurs like Clarke and Burkie angina |
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: No, ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
Exactly.
Not sure why it needs to change. - BINGO!
because Ken Holland decided he wanted 3on3 |
|
nords21
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: San Francisco, CA Joined: 03.24.2014
|
|
|
- _nay_
Still one of my favorite Simpson's lines. |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111 Next |