|
|
awesome gesture b you 2, good on ya - Makita
Lefty's idea |
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
How about the last 30 games? - VANTEL
That doesn't count. |
|
|
|
I like Sbisa I just don't like the amount.
Frankly I blame Calgary for giving Deryk Engellend 3 million a year.
That set a pretty terrible precedent. - classic321
When you compare his deal with that of Andy McDonald and Brayden Colburn it doesn't look so bad. |
|
|
|
That doesn't count. - Marwood
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
So goals against is irrelevant for a dman?
Look at the others on that list, they suck and/or play for crappy defensive teams. Sbisa doesn't provide offensive either so I don't get why he's earned 3.6 million since he can't stop goals or create them.
Isn't that the objective of the game of hockey? - Nucker101
So what is the alternative? Trade him for peanuts and shop for a physical 6/7 dman that costs 1 mil less on the UFA market? There's no gauantee they will save money or get what they need. I think Benning did the safe thing and invested 1 mil extra in knowing they still have a big physical player and follow through on the hunch that he will improve... like I said he was instantly better without Bieksa... we know Sbisa can be better... and still only 25.... and still tradeable even if it were for a 5th... the contract won't hurt this team as much as people have convinced themselves. This isnt the 40 mil cap limit that bred all the panick stricken fans 2 lock outs ago. |
|
|
|
So what is the alternative? Trade him for peanuts and shop for a physical 6/7 dman that costs 1 mil less on the UFA market? There's no gauantee they will save money or get what they need. I think Benning did the safe thing and invested 1 mil extra in knowing they still have a big physical player and follow through on the hunch that he will improve... like I said he was instantly better without Bieksa... we know Sbisa can be better... and still only 25.... and still tradeable even if it were for a 5th... the contract won't hurt this team as much as people have convinced themselves. This isnt the 40 mil cap limit that bred all the panick stricken fans 2 lock outs ago. - boonerbuck
|
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Dat PK form doe - AlexF
He's actually decent on the PK. But I don't know what else to say here, I'm not even using fancy stats, these are legitimate goal stats and he's ranked among the lowest of the low with guys on bottom feeders.
It's not like I haven't liked some of Benning's other moves(Dorsett deal is decent). I'm just saying what we'd all be thinking if we didn't have Canuck blinders on. The cold hard facts are there.
Just saying "he stepped up!" isn't enough for me. |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
If we look at the Luongo and Kesler trade situation as being similar, don’t you think it’s interesting that JB makes it a priority to re-sign a player acquired through one of his first big trades (some said Sbisa was a throw-in) rather than a player acquired through the previous GM’s big trade?
Why is Sbisa a priority and not Matthias? Is this a case of a GM validating his own trade?
I'm just stirring the pot here…
|
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
I'm okay with both deals and the $. I'm sure Benning isn't done yet, there's nothing wrong with cost certainty, which would make one think he is eying something else. |
|
|
|
He's actually decent on the PK. But I don't know what else to say here, I'm not even using fancy stats, these are legitimate goal stats and he's ranked among the lowest of the low with guys on bottom feeders.
It's not like I haven't liked some of Benning's other moves(Dorsett deal is decent). I'm just saying what we'd all be thinking if we didn't have Canuck blinders on. The cold hard facts are there.
Just saying "he stepped up!" isn't enough for me. - Nucker101
Who do you replace him with?
Keep in mind he has already beat out Clendenning, Biega Corrado |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
If we look at the Luongo and Kesler trade situation as being similar, don’t you think it’s interesting that JB makes it a priority to re-sign a player acquired through one of his first big trades (some said Sbisa was a throw-in) rather than a player acquired through the previous GM’s big trade?
Why is Sbisa a priority and not Matthias? Is this a case of a GM validating his own trade?
I'm just stirring the pot here… - bloatedmosquito
You can't let Matthias walk for nothing.
|
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
So what is the alternative? Trade him for peanuts and shop for a physical 6/7 dman that costs 1 mil less on the UFA market? There's no gauantee they will save money or get what they need. I think Benning did the safe thing and invested 1 mil extra in knowing they still have a big physical player and follow through on the hunch that he will improve... like I said he was instantly better without Bieksa... we know Sbisa can be better... and still only 25.... and still tradeable even if it were for a 5th... the contract won't hurt this team as much as people have convinced themselves. This isnt the 40 mil cap limit that bred all the panick stricken fans 2 lock outs ago. - boonerbuck
Exactly what I said yesterday. UFA market is a crapshoot. JB made the safe move. |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
You can't let Matthias walk for nothing.
- VanHockeyGuy
I agree, but that's what JB looks like he's doing. Unless Matthias signs for very little. |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
Who do you replace him with?
Keep in mind he has already beat out Clendenning, Biega Corrado - VANTEL
And he's getting better all the time!
|
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
So what is the alternative? Trade him for peanuts and shop for a physical 6/7 dman that costs 1 mil less on the UFA market? There's no gauantee they will save money or get what they need. I think Benning did the safe thing and invested 1 mil extra in knowing they still have a big physical player and follow through on the hunch that he will improve... like I said he was instantly better without Bieksa... we know Sbisa can be better... and still only 25.... and still tradeable even if it were for a 5th... the contract won't hurt this team as much as people have convinced themselves. This isnt the 40 mil cap limit that bred all the panick stricken fans 2 lock outs ago. - boonerbuck
The annoying part is that he's ranked near the bottom in goals allowed on a decent team and as a pending RFA he didn't have a whole lot of leverage. Even if they like him and see potential why not give him another one year "prove it" deal? It's not like he's worth that money right now.
It's easy to find a physical 6/7 guy who isn't a shutdown dman or an offensive one.
I'd rather just give Corrado/Biega or Pedan a shot at less than a million.
And sure it's not a crippling contract but every overpay adds up. If you overpay 5 guys by 500k-1 Million, that's between 2.5M-5M hat can be used for a legit upgrade. I'd rather overpay for a dman who at least is good at something(Either defensively or offensively). If you just want a physical presence with Sbisa's ability, they're easy and cheaper to acquire.
3.6 million for a guy who can't defend or generate offense. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
If we look at the Luongo and Kesler trade situation as being similar, don’t you think it’s interesting that JB makes it a priority to re-sign a player acquired through one of his first big trades (some said Sbisa was a throw-in) rather than a player acquired through the previous GM’s big trade?
Why is Sbisa a priority and not Matthias? Is this a case of a GM validating his own trade?
I'm just stirring the pot here… - bloatedmosquito
It's pretty simple really... the team is not short on bottom six forwards but has next to no options on D.
|
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
Who do you replace him with?
Keep in mind he has already beat out Clendenning, Biega Corrado - VANTEL
that's tough to do. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Who do you replace him with?
Keep in mind he has already beat out Clendenning, Biega Corrado - VANTEL
So what? I'd rather take the slight downgrade and save the almost 3 million. I doubt those guys will be much worse than 7th-worst in the league defensively... |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
It's pretty simple really... the team is not short on bottom six forwards but has next to no options on D. - boonerbuck
What makes Sbisa so much better than our other depth guys though? He's not providing defensive stability or offense. |
|
|
|
that's tough to do. - bloatedmosquito
I agree but you know someone is going to suggest we replace him with one of those 3. I am avoiding that post. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I agree but you know someone is going to suggest we replace him with one of those 3. I am avoiding that post. - VANTEL
I should probably avoid the posts where people suggest this is a good contract. |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
It's pretty simple really... the team is not short on bottom six forwards but has next to no options on D. - boonerbuck
Yet the fan base has been complaining for years that we don't have a good, consistent bottom six.
Interesting perspective but I don't think it is as simple as you think it is.
|
|
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Cumberland, BC Joined: 03.18.2010
|
|
|
So what is the alternative? Trade him for peanuts and shop for a physical 6/7 dman that costs 1 mil less on the UFA market? There's no gauantee they will save money or get what they need. I think Benning did the safe thing and invested 1 mil extra in knowing they still have a big physical player and follow through on the hunch that he will improve... like I said he was instantly better without Bieksa... we know Sbisa can be better... and still only 25.... and still tradeable even if it were for a 5th... the contract won't hurt this team as much as people have convinced themselves. This isnt the 40 mil cap limit that bred all the panick stricken fans 2 lock outs ago. - boonerbuck
Enough with your reason!!! |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
I agree, but that's what JB looks like he's doing. Unless Matthias signs fore very little. - bloatedmosquito
Lots of teams want guys his size, I think JB wants to keep him as well, who knows maybe he moves some $ around and signs him. That would probably put us right up against the cap though. Good or bad?
|
|
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Escaped from Krypton Joined: 07.29.2010
|
|
|
I like Sbisa I just don't like the amount.
Frankly I blame Calgary for giving Deryk Engellend 3 million a year.
That set a pretty terrible precedent. - classic321
Ya it seems a bit high.
Dorset a great player for us.....reminds me of raphe torres, but smarter. Both scored clutch goals for us.
However I feel mathias is not the kind of player we can afford to lose. He's a breakaway king, likes to challenge goalies and scores r3al quick off a turnover. Unstoppable when hes charging to net with the puck. Only player we have like that. And he's just getting better. |
|