Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks Game Day: April 9 vs. Arizona Coyotes, Miller to Back Up
Author Message
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:28 PM ET
awesome gesture b you 2, good on ya
- Makita

Lefty's idea
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:29 PM ET
How about the last 30 games?
- VANTEL

That doesn't count.
thundachunk
Location: Help
Joined: 12.31.2011

Apr 9 @ 3:29 PM ET
I like Sbisa I just don't like the amount.

Frankly I blame Calgary for giving Deryk Engellend 3 million a year.

That set a pretty terrible precedent.

- classic321

When you compare his deal with that of Andy McDonald and Brayden Colburn it doesn't look so bad.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Apr 9 @ 3:29 PM ET
That doesn't count.
- Marwood

boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Apr 9 @ 3:30 PM ET
So goals against is irrelevant for a dman?

Look at the others on that list, they suck and/or play for crappy defensive teams. Sbisa doesn't provide offensive either so I don't get why he's earned 3.6 million since he can't stop goals or create them.

Isn't that the objective of the game of hockey?

- Nucker101


So what is the alternative? Trade him for peanuts and shop for a physical 6/7 dman that costs 1 mil less on the UFA market? There's no gauantee they will save money or get what they need. I think Benning did the safe thing and invested 1 mil extra in knowing they still have a big physical player and follow through on the hunch that he will improve... like I said he was instantly better without Bieksa... we know Sbisa can be better... and still only 25.... and still tradeable even if it were for a 5th... the contract won't hurt this team as much as people have convinced themselves. This isnt the 40 mil cap limit that bred all the panick stricken fans 2 lock outs ago.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:33 PM ET
So what is the alternative? Trade him for peanuts and shop for a physical 6/7 dman that costs 1 mil less on the UFA market? There's no gauantee they will save money or get what they need. I think Benning did the safe thing and invested 1 mil extra in knowing they still have a big physical player and follow through on the hunch that he will improve... like I said he was instantly better without Bieksa... we know Sbisa can be better... and still only 25.... and still tradeable even if it were for a 5th... the contract won't hurt this team as much as people have convinced themselves. This isnt the 40 mil cap limit that bred all the panick stricken fans 2 lock outs ago.
- boonerbuck

Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:33 PM ET
Dat PK form doe
- AlexF

He's actually decent on the PK. But I don't know what else to say here, I'm not even using fancy stats, these are legitimate goal stats and he's ranked among the lowest of the low with guys on bottom feeders.

It's not like I haven't liked some of Benning's other moves(Dorsett deal is decent). I'm just saying what we'd all be thinking if we didn't have Canuck blinders on. The cold hard facts are there.

Just saying "he stepped up!" isn't enough for me.
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Clit Whisperer
Joined: 10.22.2011

Apr 9 @ 3:36 PM ET
If we look at the Luongo and Kesler trade situation as being similar, don’t you think it’s interesting that JB makes it a priority to re-sign a player acquired through one of his first big trades (some said Sbisa was a throw-in) rather than a player acquired through the previous GM’s big trade?

Why is Sbisa a priority and not Matthias? Is this a case of a GM validating his own trade?

I'm just stirring the pot here…
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Apr 9 @ 3:36 PM ET
I'm okay with both deals and the $. I'm sure Benning isn't done yet, there's nothing wrong with cost certainty, which would make one think he is eying something else.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:37 PM ET
He's actually decent on the PK. But I don't know what else to say here, I'm not even using fancy stats, these are legitimate goal stats and he's ranked among the lowest of the low with guys on bottom feeders.

It's not like I haven't liked some of Benning's other moves(Dorsett deal is decent). I'm just saying what we'd all be thinking if we didn't have Canuck blinders on. The cold hard facts are there.

Just saying "he stepped up!" isn't enough for me.

- Nucker101

Who do you replace him with?

Keep in mind he has already beat out Clendenning, Biega Corrado
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Apr 9 @ 3:38 PM ET
If we look at the Luongo and Kesler trade situation as being similar, don’t you think it’s interesting that JB makes it a priority to re-sign a player acquired through one of his first big trades (some said Sbisa was a throw-in) rather than a player acquired through the previous GM’s big trade?

Why is Sbisa a priority and not Matthias? Is this a case of a GM validating his own trade?

I'm just stirring the pot here…

- bloatedmosquito


You can't let Matthias walk for nothing.
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Clit Whisperer
Joined: 10.22.2011

Apr 9 @ 3:38 PM ET
So what is the alternative? Trade him for peanuts and shop for a physical 6/7 dman that costs 1 mil less on the UFA market? There's no gauantee they will save money or get what they need. I think Benning did the safe thing and invested 1 mil extra in knowing they still have a big physical player and follow through on the hunch that he will improve... like I said he was instantly better without Bieksa... we know Sbisa can be better... and still only 25.... and still tradeable even if it were for a 5th... the contract won't hurt this team as much as people have convinced themselves. This isnt the 40 mil cap limit that bred all the panick stricken fans 2 lock outs ago.
- boonerbuck


Exactly what I said yesterday. UFA market is a crapshoot. JB made the safe move.
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Clit Whisperer
Joined: 10.22.2011

Apr 9 @ 3:39 PM ET
You can't let Matthias walk for nothing.

- VanHockeyGuy


I agree, but that's what JB looks like he's doing. Unless Matthias signs for very little.
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Apr 9 @ 3:39 PM ET
Who do you replace him with?

Keep in mind he has already beat out Clendenning, Biega Corrado

- VANTEL


And he's getting better all the time!
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:40 PM ET
So what is the alternative? Trade him for peanuts and shop for a physical 6/7 dman that costs 1 mil less on the UFA market? There's no gauantee they will save money or get what they need. I think Benning did the safe thing and invested 1 mil extra in knowing they still have a big physical player and follow through on the hunch that he will improve... like I said he was instantly better without Bieksa... we know Sbisa can be better... and still only 25.... and still tradeable even if it were for a 5th... the contract won't hurt this team as much as people have convinced themselves. This isnt the 40 mil cap limit that bred all the panick stricken fans 2 lock outs ago.
- boonerbuck

The annoying part is that he's ranked near the bottom in goals allowed on a decent team and as a pending RFA he didn't have a whole lot of leverage. Even if they like him and see potential why not give him another one year "prove it" deal? It's not like he's worth that money right now.

It's easy to find a physical 6/7 guy who isn't a shutdown dman or an offensive one.
I'd rather just give Corrado/Biega or Pedan a shot at less than a million.

And sure it's not a crippling contract but every overpay adds up. If you overpay 5 guys by 500k-1 Million, that's between 2.5M-5M hat can be used for a legit upgrade. I'd rather overpay for a dman who at least is good at something(Either defensively or offensively). If you just want a physical presence with Sbisa's ability, they're easy and cheaper to acquire.

3.6 million for a guy who can't defend or generate offense.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Apr 9 @ 3:41 PM ET
If we look at the Luongo and Kesler trade situation as being similar, don’t you think it’s interesting that JB makes it a priority to re-sign a player acquired through one of his first big trades (some said Sbisa was a throw-in) rather than a player acquired through the previous GM’s big trade?

Why is Sbisa a priority and not Matthias? Is this a case of a GM validating his own trade?

I'm just stirring the pot here…

- bloatedmosquito



It's pretty simple really... the team is not short on bottom six forwards but has next to no options on D.

bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Clit Whisperer
Joined: 10.22.2011

Apr 9 @ 3:41 PM ET
Who do you replace him with?

Keep in mind he has already beat out Clendenning, Biega Corrado

- VANTEL


that's tough to do.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:41 PM ET
Who do you replace him with?

Keep in mind he has already beat out Clendenning, Biega Corrado

- VANTEL

So what? I'd rather take the slight downgrade and save the almost 3 million. I doubt those guys will be much worse than 7th-worst in the league defensively...
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:42 PM ET
It's pretty simple really... the team is not short on bottom six forwards but has next to no options on D.
- boonerbuck

What makes Sbisa so much better than our other depth guys though? He's not providing defensive stability or offense.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:42 PM ET
that's tough to do.
- bloatedmosquito

I agree but you know someone is going to suggest we replace him with one of those 3. I am avoiding that post.
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:43 PM ET
I agree but you know someone is going to suggest we replace him with one of those 3. I am avoiding that post.
- VANTEL

I should probably avoid the posts where people suggest this is a good contract.
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Clit Whisperer
Joined: 10.22.2011

Apr 9 @ 3:44 PM ET
It's pretty simple really... the team is not short on bottom six forwards but has next to no options on D.
- boonerbuck


Yet the fan base has been complaining for years that we don't have a good, consistent bottom six.

Interesting perspective but I don't think it is as simple as you think it is.
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:44 PM ET
So what is the alternative? Trade him for peanuts and shop for a physical 6/7 dman that costs 1 mil less on the UFA market? There's no gauantee they will save money or get what they need. I think Benning did the safe thing and invested 1 mil extra in knowing they still have a big physical player and follow through on the hunch that he will improve... like I said he was instantly better without Bieksa... we know Sbisa can be better... and still only 25.... and still tradeable even if it were for a 5th... the contract won't hurt this team as much as people have convinced themselves. This isnt the 40 mil cap limit that bred all the panick stricken fans 2 lock outs ago.
- boonerbuck

Enough with your reason!!!
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Apr 9 @ 3:44 PM ET
I agree, but that's what JB looks like he's doing. Unless Matthias signs fore very little.
- bloatedmosquito


Lots of teams want guys his size, I think JB wants to keep him as well, who knows maybe he moves some $ around and signs him. That would probably put us right up against the cap though. Good or bad?
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Escaped from Krypton
Joined: 07.29.2010

Apr 9 @ 3:45 PM ET
I like Sbisa I just don't like the amount.

Frankly I blame Calgary for giving Deryk Engellend 3 million a year.

That set a pretty terrible precedent.

- classic321


Ya it seems a bit high.

Dorset a great player for us.....reminds me of raphe torres, but smarter. Both scored clutch goals for us.

However I feel mathias is not the kind of player we can afford to lose. He's a breakaway king, likes to challenge goalies and scores r3al quick off a turnover. Unstoppable when hes charging to net with the puck. Only player we have like that. And he's just getting better.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next