Damien Cox stirring the pot

Why Kane trade could actually cost the Jets

http://www.sportsnet.ca/h...d-actually-cost-the-jets/

89 you try the carl's jr 1/3 Lb thickburger el diablo 1,200 calories 63g of fat lmao


Going to try it
- gerbe75pts

Probably get just as sick eating this as you would with your grey meat

Kaleta couldn't hold is jock, Kaleta is nothing but a turtle. I'd take Wilson all day long on this team.
- SABRES 89

Damien Cox stirring the pot

Why Kane trade could actually cost the Jets

http://www.sportsnet.ca/h...d-actually-cost-the-jets/
- GilPerreault11

I don't know why people can't let this go, Murray got the players he wanted and shipped out what he didn't want. Not you Gil.

I had in there 4 days I think I'm going out thanks lol
- gerbe75pts

Dude! Go get beef on weck at top round! I'm telling you......

- Sabresfan-365

At least kaleta knew how the playoffs work...



Just because wilson is better than a guy who should be in the AHL doesn't mean we need to give up assets to get him. Especially since we've got guys who can play that role.

- Sabresfan-365

What the hell is this ?

I had in there 4 days I think I'm going out thanks lol
- gerbe75pts

On second thought, if it's ground beef, one day. Otherwise freeze it.

What the hell is this ?
- SABRES 89

Tom Wilson

At least kaleta knew how the playoffs work...



Just because wilson is better than a guy who should be in the AHL doesn't mean we need to give up assets to get him. Especially since we've got guys who can play that role.
- Sabresfan-365

Kaleta doesn't and didn't know s$$t except how to start trouble and run and hide.

Tom Wilson
- Sabresfan-365

Sign him up!

Kaleta doesn't and didn't know s$$t except how to start trouble and run and hide.
- SABRES 89

And if we were trading Kaleta for Wilson that would mean something.


Personally, I'd like someone who spends more time on the ice than in the penalty box and is aware of how the NHL playoffs work.


But that's just me.

And if we were trading Kaleta for Wilson that would mean something.


Personally, I'd like someone who spends more time on the ice than in the penalty box and is aware of how the NHL playoffs work.


But that's just me.
- Sabresfan-365

Tanner Glass, still rather have Wilson.

Tanner Glass, still rather have Wilson.
- SABRES 89

What does that have to do with anything.


Would you give up a 1st rounder to get Wilson?

What does that have to do with anything.


Would you give up a 1st rounder to get Wilson?
- Sabresfan-365

Gritty player and spends time on the ice, Wilson won't cost a 1st, are you kidding.

I don't know why people can't let this go, Murray got the players he wanted and shipped out what he didn't want.
- SABRES 89

If you read the article it had an angle attached to Winnipeg being down 3-0 and a positive Sabres side of the trade that challenges some arguments we've seen in this blog/discussion.

Gritty player and spends time on the ice, Wilson won't cost a 1st, are you kidding.
- SABRES 89

You don't think a former 1st round pick is going to cost that? Especially after what happened last time they dealt one?

If you read the article it had an angle attached to Winnipeg being down 3-0 and a positive Sabres side of the trade that challenges some arguments we've seen in this blog/discussion.
- GilPerreault11

I didn't read it but, I don't know if having Kane on that team now would change the outcome. The Jets have a good team though

If you read the article it had an angle attached to Winnipeg being down 3-0 and a positive Sabres side of the trade that challenges some arguments we've seen in this blog/discussion.
- GilPerreault11

It's nothing that hasn't already been discussed here. Plus it's damien cox. a few months from now if Kane goes through a scoring slump he'll write a similar article on Murray, ethics, integrity, how winnipeg did great on this trade..

You don't think a former 1st round pick is going to cost that? Especially after what happened last time they dealt one?
- Sabresfan-365

Nope.

Damien Cox stirring the pot

Why Kane trade could actually cost the Jets

http://www.sportsnet.ca/h...d-actually-cost-the-jets/
- GilPerreault11

This article makes no sense.

He mentions how in the short term it looks good for Winnipeg, but only because Winnipeg is competitive now.

Yet when mentioning the long term, he leaves out the fact that they got Lemieux and an additional 1st.

Also, he sort of contradicts himself does he not? He basically says the Bobby Ryan trade which mirrors the trade for Kane was a bad move for Ottawa

It's nothing that hasn't already been discussed here. Plus it's damien cox. a few months from now if Kane goes through a scoring slump he'll write a similar article on Murray, ethics, integrity, how winnipeg did great on this trade..
- Sabresfan-365

It's a pretty interesting read, because he basically discusses both sides of the argument, which as you said, we've also done here.

But what he has to say does make a lot of sense.

This article makes no sense.

He mentions how in the short term it looks good for Winnipeg, but only because Winnipeg is competitive now.

Yet when mentioning the long term, he leaves out the fact that they got Lemieux and an additional 1st.

Also, he sort of contradicts himself does he not? He basically says the Bobby Ryan trade which mirrors the trade for Kane was a bad move for Ottawa
- sbroads24

I interpreted what he said differently. The whole premise for the article is that it generally takes years to know the actual winner of a trade. He goes through the entire thing formulating arguments for and against each side of the issue. It's basically a debate with himself.

Personally, I thought it was pretty well written, but everyone's interpretation could be different I guess.

I interpreted what he said differently. The whole premise for the article is that it generally takes years to know the actual winner of a trade. He goes through the entire thing formulating arguments for and against each side of the issue. It's basically a debate with himself.

Personally, I thought it was pretty well written, but everyone's interpretation could be different I guess.
- HonkFortheGoose

IMO its an entire contradiction. He says that it takes years to evaluate some trades (Like Bobby Ryan) but then cites the Jets being down 3-0 this year as some sort of indicator they needed Kane back? Kane was gone for the year anyways.

I also disagree that Kane was the best player in the deal.

If Winnipeg gets a #1 defensemen out of it, then that's more important than a winger IMO

IMO its an entire contradiction. He says that it takes years to evaluate some trades (Like Bobby Ryan) but then cites the Jets being down 3-0 this year as some sort of indicator they needed Kane back? Kane was gone for the year anyways.

I also disagree that Kane was the best player in the deal.

If Winnipeg gets a #1 defensemen out of it, then that's more important than a winger IMO
- sbroads24

Winnipeg didn't get a #1 defenseman out of the deal, not a championship caliber one anyway.