LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Not that I don't like him, but every time he plays in the NHL he gets shelled. He has played 50 games and has been terrible - VANTEL
You have to put that in context like Benning said today, those 50 games are pretty much meaningless. He's gotten proper coaching this year which has completely turned his game around....and it's showing.
Still needs to keep improving though!! |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Mario selling some of his shares in the Pens - VANTEL
I would too after that Depres trade and Letang's health woes. |
|
|
|
Mario selling some of his shares in the Pens - VANTEL
4 years to late |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
You have to put that in context like Benning said today, those 50 games are pretty much meaningless. He's gotten proper coaching this year which has completely turned his game around....and it's showing.
Still needs to keep improving though!! - LeftCoaster
I remember reading that he didn't even have a proper goalie coach in Florida either. |
|
Zogg
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.16.2005
|
|
|
I see Miller Lack back next year - VANTEL
You don't think Lack gets moved? |
|
|
|
You have to put that in context like Benning said today, those 50 games are pretty much meaningless. He's gotten proper coaching this year which has completely turned his game around....and it's showing.
Still needs to keep improving though!! - LeftCoaster
Seeing is believing. I seen him play less that 20 games ago for the Canucks 1 game was ok and the other was |
|
|
|
You don't think Lack gets moved? - Zogg
I dont |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Seeing is believing. I seen him play less that 20 games ago for the Canucks 1 game was ok and the other was - VANTEL
Not any different than Lu, Schneider, Lack, Miller etc - they've all had terrible games. As a young guy Bo struggled at times this year too. Confidence is everything, something Markstrom needs and he'll only get it with experience. |
|
Zogg
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.16.2005
|
|
|
I dont - VANTEL
what is your stance based on? |
|
|
|
Not any different than Lu, Schneider, Lack, Miller etc - they've all had terrible games. - LeftCoaster
Those goalies would have 10 to 12 good games one bad one . Markstrom would have 1 good one ,10-12 bad ones. Fla wrote him off. Torts wrote him off. WD was very very skeptical about playing him. |
|
|
|
what is your stance based on? - Zogg
Instinct |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Those goalies would have 10 to 12 good games one bad one . Markstrom would have 1 good one ,10-12 bad ones. Fla wrote him off. Torts wrote him off. WD was very very skeptical about playing him. - VANTEL
None of them started off as stars, I don't think you've seen enough of him to pass judgment to be honest.
He's started two games with the Canucks...that's it. |
|
|
|
Not that I don't like him, but every time he plays in the NHL he gets shelled. He has played 50 games and has been terrible - VANTEL
At some point he will shake off the NHL nerves. His elite playoffs so far will go a long ways to help in the NHL. |
|
|
|
None of them started off as stars, I don't think you've seen enough of him to pass judgment to be honest.
He's started two games with the Canucks...that's it. - LeftCoaster
You're right , I have not seen enough of him to pass judgement, same as you have not seen enough of him to hand him the keys to the new car |
|
|
|
At some point he will shake off the NHL nerves. His elite playoffs so far will go a long ways to help in the NHL. - thundachunk
Maybe . Next time will be his fourth go at it. |
|
|
|
Instinct - VANTEL
Best argument I have heard. No joke its a legit answer imo. |
|
|
|
Maybe . Next time will be his fourth go at it. - VANTEL
He needs a few game stretch. |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
You're right , I have not seen enough of him to pass judge,ent dame as you have not seen enough of him to hand him the keys to the new car - VANTEL
Yes of course, I'm not proposing he be our starter next year. I'm saying he has tremendous raw talent that should not be discarded without careful consideration.
I'd like to see the Canucks develop him properly like they did with Lack and Schneider. |
|
DariusKnight
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: "The Alien has landed in Vancouver!" Joined: 03.09.2006
|
|
|
Markstrom's not going to be traded, they'd be lucky to get a 4th-7th round pick for him based on his lack of NHL success/experience. Lack will be traded because he's not going to resign here for less than Miller money or accept being the backup now that he's entering his prime and since Miller's going nowhere with his contract, you move Lack and get something for him instead of losing him for nothing. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
They actually appreciate me - Nucker101
You know that being the sanest nut in the nut house doesn't mean you aren't a nut right? |
|
|
|
Markstrom's not going to be traded, they'd be lucky to get a 4th-7th round pick for him based on his lack of NHL success/experience. Lack will be traded because he's not going to resign here for less than Miller money or accept being the backup now that he's entering his prime and since Miller's going nowhere with his contract, you move Lack and get something for him instead of losing him for nothing. - DariusKnight
Not far from the truth other than him signing for Miller money. He isn't worth Miller money. |
|
|
|
He needs a few game stretch. - thundachunk
If you had Tuka Rask or J Quick to teach Markstrom the ropes or shelter him then that would be ok. You have an old Goalie who just came off a huge injury.
With Lack you know what you have Markstom is a huge questionmark, and for an ownership that is hell bent on making the plyoffs and worried about putting butts in the seats, you don't move your best goalie and fan favourite |
|
|
|
Markstrom's not going to be traded, they'd be lucky to get a 4th-7th round pick for him based on his lack of NHL success/experience. Lack will be traded because he's not going to resign here for less than Miller money or accept being the backup now that he's entering his prime and since Miller's going nowhere with his contract, you move Lack and get something for him instead of losing him for nothing. - DariusKnight
Seeing we played Oklahoma city I am sure they had scouts there observing Makstrom. Buffalo is a hop skip and jump away from Utica too. I am sure they were looking too |
|
|
|
The pregame joint is lit. |
|
|
|
The pregame joint is lit. - A_SteamingLombardi
reported |
|