Big_Lightnin
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Pain is coming Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
49/7 is half of 104/12?
That's news to me. Since when is 7 almost half of 8.7? - burn
It isn't. "Is being paid" refers to size of pay check... Amount is IS currently being paid. |
|
burn
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON Joined: 08.02.2006
|
|
|
Yes. $12M is almost twice as much as $7M. I was generalizing.
And if we look at the actually years when RoR's deal would start its 50% more, which still seems fine to me. - Big_Lightnin
Cherry picking years and ignoring length? Not the best way to compare.... Compare the entire contract (that Marty did by comparing 49 to 104) |
|
Big_Lightnin
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Pain is coming Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
Isn't cap hit more important to a team than actual cash in a given year?
7 mil per for ROR is a lot if cheddar any way you slice it.
And he will probably make 10 mil over the first couple years. - GardinerExpress
Players don't give a rats ass about cap hit.
And I never said it wasn't... But compared to money being paid to Crosby, it's about right. |
|
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: The centre of the hockey universe Joined: 07.31.2006
|
|
|
Can someone explain to me why Gardiner keeps getting mentioned as some great trading piece we have? The article suggests he could be the key to a deal... am I the only one who thinks he sucks? He was awful last year, even beyond awful. I don't care about his stats, he just sucked.... Do the Ave management not watch hockey that they would even consider taking him for ROR? Is 4 million plus good for a defensemen who can't defend? - Hockey_Reverend
Corsi! |
|
NANO_23x19
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Raaarrr! Joined: 06.10.2015
|
|
|
As I said yesterday: welcome to the mad house - lumlums
This early? Typical male behaviour, I guess. |
|
Big_Lightnin
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Pain is coming Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
Cherry picking years and ignoring length? Not the best way to compare.... Compare the entire contract (that Marty did by comparing 49 to 104) - burn
Why would I compare the entire contract when RoR can't sign a contract like that. It's apples and oranges.
And not sure how I am cherry picking years, I used the current year because that is what he is making, and I used the actual years of RoR's future contract... |
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
The Av's covets Leafs defenseman Jake Gardiner
*So you're saying there's a chance |
|
Lucas Neilson
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Hockeybuzz Fantasy @lucasneilson84 , ON Joined: 10.04.2013
|
|
|
Schenn-Sational!
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Sorry you don't understand...Y Joined: 10.08.2008
|
|
|
Can someone explain to me why Gardiner keeps getting mentioned as some great trading piece we have? The article suggests he could be the key to a deal... am I the only one who thinks he sucks? He was awful last year, even beyond awful. I don't care about his stats, he just sucked.... Do the Ave management not watch hockey that they would even consider taking him for ROR? Is 4 million plus good for a defensemen who can't defend? - Hockey_Reverend
his fancy stats are pretty awesome. He makes a lot of good plays... only problem is he also makes a bunch of bone-headed ones. Still, the benefits outweigh the negatives with him.
Lets see what Babcock can do with him. Leafs shouldn't be trading anyone for ROR. |
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
Ryan @ryanfancey 13m13 minutes ago
Been a lot of Phaneuf/Kessel talk recently, so here's your semiannual reminder that the Leafs really need to trade Tyler Bozak.
|
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
Corsi! - Atomic Wedgie
I'd rather Kessel play D, how's his Corsi?
Scores more, defends just as well!!!!! |
|
Big_Lightnin
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Pain is coming Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
KesselRules
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: The Koolaid tells me Marner > Eichel ~ twiztedmike Joined: 12.31.2012
|
|
|
DoubleDown
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Not to point any fingers but Tyson Barrie has looked awful in the blue and white for the Leafs., QC Joined: 07.28.2006
|
|
|
Stastny is overpaid. Weber is not - GardinerExpress
that is utterly irrelevant. we're discussing existing contract value, not what we think they should be paid. |
|
NANO_23x19
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Raaarrr! Joined: 06.10.2015
|
|
|
Schenn-Sational!
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Sorry you don't understand...Y Joined: 10.08.2008
|
|
|
Cherry picking years and ignoring length? Not the best way to compare.... Compare the entire contract (that Marty did by comparing 49 to 104) - burn
first 7 years of Crosby's contract, he makes 76.8M.
As opposed to 49 in the rumoured contract ROR would want.
That's the type of contract Crosby would have got if back-diving wasn't allowed when he signed.
Comparing the cap-hits is stupid, because of that.
Stop being dense. |
|
TheThrill
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Sid, I'm open!, ON Joined: 12.10.2013
|
|
|
his fancy stats are pretty awesome. He makes a lot of good plays... only problem is he also makes a bunch of bone-headed ones. Still, the benefits outweigh the negatives with him.
Lets see what Babcock can do with him. Leafs shouldn't be trading anyone for ROR. - Schenn-Sational!
The latest one out there is Leafs trading Dion and the 4th for ROR and the 10th
Heard Blundell drop that one this morning, with little to no substance to it, admittedly |
|
Schenn-Sational!
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Sorry you don't understand...Y Joined: 10.08.2008
|
|
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
Big_Lightnin
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Pain is coming Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
first 7 years of Crosby's contract, he makes 76.8M.
As opposed to 49 in the rumoured contract ROR would want.
That's the type of contract Crosby would have got if back-diving wasn't allowed when he signed.
Comparing the cap-hits is stupid, because of that.
Stop being dense. - Schenn-Sational!
Funny thing is burn already said he agrees with the point we are making, he is just arguing about how we are making it |
|
|
|
Post a pic of your junk. That'll get you banned. - KesselRules
or
Feds91Stammer avatar |
|
Canada Cup
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Macrodata Refinement , ON Joined: 07.06.2007
|
|
|
9:19 am and there's already heated arguments? Is it always this lively in the comment sections? If so, I'm going to like it here. - NANO_23x19
Even better - the arguments are always fresh and new. People hardly ever argue the same things over and over and over and over |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
first 7 years of Crosby's contract, he makes 76.8M.
As opposed to 49 in the rumoured contract ROR would want.
That's the type of contract Crosby would have got if back-diving wasn't allowed when he signed.
Comparing the cap-hits is stupid, because of that.
Stop being dense. - Schenn-Sational!
Probably just as easy to log off.... |
|
Lucas Neilson
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Hockeybuzz Fantasy @lucasneilson84 , ON Joined: 10.04.2013
|
|
|
The latest one out there is Leafs trading Dion and the 4th for ROR and the 10th
Heard Blundell drop that one this morning, with little to no substance to it, admittedly - TheThrill
according to Button we could still get Hanifin at 10 |
|