Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks: Draft Prospect Jakub Zboril, Cody Hodgson's Buyout?
Author Message
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Jun 17 @ 5:24 PM ET
Anderson is a great goalie and seems to get even better the more clutch the situation becomes. He's getting older but hasn't shown it yet, like Miller has for example. I still remember his 50+ save performance for the Avs v SJ some years back. I swear about half of those 50 were from prime shooting positions (in the slot, point-blankers, etc).

If he's on the block he should net a solid return. Lehner shouldn't net more that a 2nd, which is the same valuation I'd give Lack.

- AlexF


Anderson is definitely signed at a more reasonable cap hit.

It all depends if the interested club wants 3 more years or a more short term solution. Ottawa's situation in goal is very similar to ours.
I-own_da-Northwest
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cariboo, BC
Joined: 08.08.2009

Jun 17 @ 5:35 PM ET
I saw in the other thread someone say that the sedins "will" not be traded. Fair enough. I thinks it's more that they CAN'T be traded. There's be no interest in 35 year old players in a decline making 7 million/year that need to play with eachother to be decent & are only 1 dimensional players to boot.
AlexF
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Whistler, BC
Joined: 06.25.2011

Jun 17 @ 5:44 PM ET
I saw in the other thread someone say that the sedins "will" not be traded. Fair enough. I thinks it's more that they CAN'T be traded. There's be no interest in 35 year old players in a decline making 7 million/year that need to play with eachother to be decent & are only 1 dimensional players to boot.
- I-own_da-Northwest


We're stuck with the Sedins. The best we can hope for is Horvat and Virtanen progress at the same remarkable clip as Gaudreau and Monahan. Then we can play the pair of them as top liners allowing the Sedins to play 2nd line minutes (and hopefully against 2nd line opposition), which should make this team pretty damn good all of a sudden IMO. Likely won't happen though.
WhiteLie
Referee
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087
Joined: 07.26.2010

Jun 17 @ 5:47 PM ET
I saw in the other thread someone say that the sedins "will" not be traded. Fair enough. I thinks it's more that they CAN'T be traded. There's be no interest in 35 year old players in a decline making 7 million/year that need to play with eachother to be decent & are only 1 dimensional players to boot.
- I-own_da-Northwest


So many things wrong with this post...
Yes, going from above a point per game to a point per game is declining, but by no means will they plummet to 30 point players. Second, they have proved they don't need each other at various points throughout their career (Hank's MVP season?), its just stupid to split them knowing how great they can play together. And to your last point, 1 dimensional? They aren't going to win the Selke or have the most hits, but you don't need to worry about their defensive game in the slightest. It is rare they are out of position or get burned on a play. The ONLY thing blocking a trade is them and potentially the combined cap hit, but I'm sure 29 other teams would try their best to make space for them
The_Kuze
Joined: 01.26.2012

Jun 17 @ 5:48 PM ET
The Sedins were in the top 20 in scoring were they not. Pretty Damn amazing they are not and have never been the issue. The r3st of the team is what is lacking. Build a good defensive team with some two way dmen and watch how good well be
I-own_da-Northwest
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cariboo, BC
Joined: 08.08.2009

Jun 17 @ 5:52 PM ET
We're stuck with the Sedins. The best we can hope for is Horvat and Virtanen progress at the same remarkable clip as Gaudreau and Monahan. Then we can play the pair of them as top liners allowing the Sedins to play 2nd line minutes (and hopefully against 2nd line opposition), which should make this team pretty damn good all of a sudden IMO. Likely won't happen though.
- AlexF



No, I think you're right. I think we'll probably have 7-10 years of suffering ahead. Gillis had no succession plan. It was always project players and a tweek to win now.
WhiteLie
Referee
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087
Joined: 07.26.2010

Jun 17 @ 5:55 PM ET
The Sedins were in the top 20 in scoring were they not. Pretty Damn amazing they are not and have never been the issue. The r3st of the team is what is lacking. Build a good defensive team with some two way dmen and watch how good well be
- The_Kuze


Daniel tied for 8th, Hank tied for 10th, totally dragging the team down
I-own_da-Northwest
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cariboo, BC
Joined: 08.08.2009

Jun 17 @ 5:55 PM ET
So many things wrong with this post...
Yes, going from above a point per game to a point per game is declining, but by no means will they plummet to 30 point players. Second, they have proved they don't need each other at various points throughout their career (Hank's MVP season?), its just stupid to split them knowing how great they can play together. And to your last point, 1 dimensional? They aren't going to win the Selke or have the most hits, but you don't need to worry about their defensive game in the slightest. It is rare they are out of position or get burned on a play. The ONLY thing blocking a trade is them and potentially the combined cap hit, but I'm sure 29 other teams would try their best to make space for them

- WhiteLie



I get it, you remember what the Sedins were like 4-8 seasons ago. But I'm a Canuck fan first and foremost. Have you ever watched them on the defensive side of things when they don't have the puck? The thing is they're so good with it they rarely cough it up. But it's a nightmare watching them in their zone without the puck.
I-own_da-Northwest
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cariboo, BC
Joined: 08.08.2009

Jun 17 @ 5:56 PM ET
Daniel tied for 8th, Hank tied for 10th, totally dragging the team down
- WhiteLie

I bet you expect 100-120 point bounce back years for each of them.
anavar
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.29.2008

Jun 17 @ 5:56 PM ET
No, I think you're right. I think we'll probably have 7-10 years of suffering ahead. Gillis had no succession plan. It was always project players and a tweek to win now.
- I-own_da-Northwest

7-10 years? lol Even if the sedins left in 3 years you think it would take us 4-7 years to turn things around to where we are now? That would mean none of our current prospects step up and we keep finishing too high to draft a higher pick? No ufa signings, no trades and no development would produce the above scenario. 5% chance of that happening.
AlexF
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Whistler, BC
Joined: 06.25.2011

Jun 17 @ 6:00 PM ET
Jeff Paterson ‏@patersonjeff
#Canucks with 1 pick in first 3 rounds of draft yet interviewed 65/120 kids combine. Sounds like a GM who plans on having a few more picks
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 17 @ 6:02 PM ET
31 for Lack. Let's do it!!

Go!

- mhp

Lack to SJ for Dillon
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Jun 17 @ 6:02 PM ET
We're stuck with the Sedins. The best we can hope for is Horvat and Virtanen progress at the same remarkable clip as Gaudreau and Monahan. Then we can play the pair of them as top liners allowing the Sedins to play 2nd line minutes (and hopefully against 2nd line opposition), which should make this team pretty damn good all of a sudden IMO. Likely won't happen though.
- AlexF

Oh it could very well happen, but we'll still have the same defense.
mhp
Buffalo Sabres
Location: PROUD MEMBER OF RED SOX NATION SINCE 1975!!!! , SD
Joined: 01.14.2008

Jun 17 @ 6:03 PM ET
Lack to SJ for Dillon
- VANTEL


You would actually trade him within the conference?
AlexF
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Whistler, BC
Joined: 06.25.2011

Jun 17 @ 6:04 PM ET
7-10 years? lol Even if the sedins left in 3 years you think it would take us 4-7 years to turn things around to where we are now? That would mean none of our current prospects step up and we keep finishing too high to draft a higher pick? No ufa signings, no trades and no development would produce the above scenario. 5% chance of that happening.
- anavar


Depends what you define as "suffering". I would say a lot of Canuck fans are doing just that with this team, and that's with a team that made the playoffs. This city wants a cup or, at least, some deep playoff runs to cheer about. Constantly losing in the 1st round doesn't give anyone the warm and fuzzies and this team has begun to specialize in it.

So with that in mind how long will it take this team to turn into an ANA, CHI, etc.? Might be a while.
I-own_da-Northwest
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cariboo, BC
Joined: 08.08.2009

Jun 17 @ 6:05 PM ET
7-10 years? lol Even if the sedins left in 3 years you think it would take us 4-7 years to turn things around to where we are now? That would mean none of our current prospects step up and we keep finishing too high to draft a higher pick? No ufa signings, no trades and no development would produce the above scenario. 5% chance of that happening.
- anavar

Well our last 15 years should be some indication of our previous drafting/developing.

In the last 15 drafts what do we currently have playing in our roster? Bieksa, Hansen, Horvat?

95% chance of being elite.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 17 @ 6:07 PM ET
Jeff Paterson ‏@patersonjeff
#Canucks with 1 pick in first 3 rounds of draft yet interviewed 65/120 kids combine. Sounds like a GM who plans on having a few more picks

- AlexF

Benning is not a good liar . His answers were mostly honest but there was a lot of lip service. Minutes ago he did reiterate he is going for speed , skill and grit. He sure hinted around making room available . He came out and said this year Markstrom COrrado and Clendenning are all NHL ready players this year. He was very impressed with JV . Grenier was most improved and ready to jump , he also said Shink and Gaunce were ready. That's a lost of spots to open up
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 17 @ 6:07 PM ET
You would actually trade him within the conference?
- mhp

Yes
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Jun 17 @ 6:08 PM ET
Jeff Paterson ‏@patersonjeff
#Canucks with 1 pick in first 3 rounds of draft yet interviewed 65/120 kids combine. Sounds like a GM who plans on having a few more picks

- AlexF


JB's recent signings haven't garnered him much love from the fan base, lets see if a guy that seems known for his scouting can make some trades to recoup some picks and draft some gems.

watch him make some moves that involve accumulating picks for next draft.
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Jun 17 @ 6:11 PM ET
Benning is not a good liar . His answers were mostly honest but there was a lot of lip service. Minutes ago he did reiterate he is going for speed , skill and grit. He sure hinted around making room available . He came out and said this year Markstrom COrrado and Clendenning are all NHL ready players this year. He was very impressed with JV . Grenier was most improved and ready to jump , he also said Shink and Gaunce were ready. That's a lost of spots to open up
- VANTEL


Moves will be made. Just hoping there isn't some perverse sense of loyalty to the core and he just mixes up the supporting cast.
WhiteLie
Referee
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087
Joined: 07.26.2010

Jun 17 @ 6:11 PM ET
I get it, you remember what the Sedins were like 4-8 seasons ago. But I'm a Canuck fan first and foremost. Have you ever watched them on the defensive side of things when they don't have the puck? The thing is they're so good with it they rarely cough it up. But it's a nightmare watching them in their zone without the puck.
- I-own_da-Northwest


Yeah I have watched them, many times. I am not sure how the Sedin's are the disaster in their own zone? Being solid defensively as a forward is pretty simple, winger covers the point, weak side slides into high slot while the center supports the D down low. If anything, its playing with Bieska, Sbisa etc. thats causing the "nightmare" youre watching. I get it, you think they all need to be feisty, physical players like Kesler to be good defensive forwards while others can just be solid
WhiteLie
Referee
Location: When youre 7 pages behind Dont bother catching up, you will never get that time back - Codes1087
Joined: 07.26.2010

Jun 17 @ 6:13 PM ET
I bet you expect 100-120 point bounce back years for each of them.
- I-own_da-Northwest


Nope butI would be pretty surprised if they ever drop below 70 points in a season before their contracts expire
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 17 @ 6:13 PM ET
We're stuck with the Sedins. The best we can hope for is Horvat and Virtanen progress at the same remarkable clip as Gaudreau and Monahan. Then we can play the pair of them as top liners allowing the Sedins to play 2nd line minutes (and hopefully against 2nd line opposition), which should make this team pretty damn good all of a sudden IMO. Likely won't happen though.
- AlexF


Someone said give them two more years to make the transition easier. It is thos two years that instead of drafting a player like Kane and Toews with the top three pick we will get mid draft players like Jensen and Gaunce.

I really don't get why fans don't want to go after high draft picks for three years
AlexF
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Whistler, BC
Joined: 06.25.2011

Jun 17 @ 6:16 PM ET
Benning is not a good liar . His answers were mostly honest but there was a lot of lip service. Minutes ago he did reiterate he is going for speed , skill and grit. He sure hinted around making room available . He came out and said this year Markstrom COrrado and Clendenning are all NHL ready players this year. He was very impressed with JV . Grenier was most improved and ready to jump , he also said Shink and Gaunce were ready. That's a lost of spots to open up
- VANTEL


I've been out of the loop for a while but if he stated publicly that all of those players were NHL ready then he'd only be saying it to boost their confidence and let them know that spots are available for the guys that show him they're ready. For a young guy that's plenty to go for motivation before camp and a heck of a lot more motivation than on teams whose rosters are pretty much already set for next season.

There's no way he'd actually bring all those guys up even if he could, unless his intention was to transform this team into a bottom feeder. Which might be their desired trajectory at this point for all I know. Rogers would be half full most nights though...for years.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Jun 17 @ 6:16 PM ET
Nope butI would be pretty surprised if they ever drop below 70 points in a season before their contracts expire
- WhiteLie



Again by those two producing and no one else helping we will draft 15-30 every year they are here
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next