|
|
Not really - Nucker101
Exactly some of us live for this time of year. |
|
|
|
Bieksa to the avs for 31 and lack for 32 to arizona. harkins and kylington/roy - mauryballstein
They need a D. He would be a good fit. Arizona have a weird relationship with that hard Mike Smith and his herky jerky goaltending style, so I doubt he goes there. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
|
|
Leafs had a bad draft day |
|
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC Joined: 05.29.2014
|
|
|
True. ARZ has a nice forward group of prospects now with Domi/Strome/Duclair/Merkley/Dvorak
Still think they (frank)ed up taking Strome over Hanifin and Marner - Nucker101
Yea I'd have gone with Marner/Hanifin/Provorov instead of Strome |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
Did we draft David Booth? |
|
Zogg
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.16.2005
|
|
|
Leafs had a bad draft day - VANTEL
they should just pack it in and go home |
|
Zogg
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.16.2005
|
|
|
Did we draft David Booth? - hillbillydeluxe
apparently Patrick Sharp |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
apparently Patrick Sharp - Zogg
Longevity |
|
GloveHandStrong
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Kenowhere, WI Joined: 07.02.2014
|
|
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
Wait until you face LUcic five times next year. - VANTEL
Make your mind up Vantel... do you want to compete with these teams or do you want to rebuild? I'd enjoy Lucic on our team but not if we have to give up picks and young players like what LA did. Lucic will be old by the time the last 3 draft classes are in their prime and you will be female doging about the contract you were willing to trade future for...
Time is what it's going to take. |
|
Beachcomber
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Left Coast, BC Joined: 12.01.2013
|
|
|
Leafs had a bad draft day - VANTEL
They are going to regret passing up on Hanifin. |
|
|
|
Make your mind up Vantel... do you want to compete with these teams or do you want to rebuild? I'd enjoy Lucic on our team but not if we have to give up picks and young players like what LA did. Lucic will be old by the time the last 3 draft classes are in their prime and you will be female doging about the contract you were willing to trade future for...
Time is what it's going to take. - boonerbuck
I am not an Edler fan and would have traded him without blinking. I have been very very very very very consistent about that all along , never changed my mind once . Never
Never
Never |
|
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC Joined: 05.29.2014
|
|
|
Make your mind up Vantel... do you want to compete with these teams or do you want to rebuild? I'd enjoy Lucic on our team but not if we have to give up picks and young players like what LA did. Lucic will be old by the time the last 3 draft classes are in their prime and you will be female doging about the contract you were willing to trade future for...
Time is what it's going to take. - boonerbuck
Yup whether or not we get him for free I am very glad we didn't expend the kind of assets LA gave to get Lucic. If we picked him up people would still be saying we're not contenders why would you give that for a top 6 forward who put up Higgins type numbers last year |
|
Beachcomber
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Left Coast, BC Joined: 12.01.2013
|
|
|
Nucks are going to get pushed around the ice all next season. The lean years are upon us. |
|
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC Joined: 05.29.2014
|
|
|
Leafs had a bad draft day - VANTEL
They should have used one of those 1sts |
|
|
|
Yup whether or not we get him for free I am very glad we didn't expend the kind of assets LA gave to get Lucic. If we picked him up people would still be saying we're not contenders why would you give that for a top 6 forward who put up Higgins type numbers last year - bezz44
Boston asked for Edler |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Leafs had a bad draft day - VANTEL
Mariner is going to be a stud but yeah they didn't trade away any vets. |
|
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC Joined: 05.29.2014
|
|
|
Boston asked for Edler - VANTEL
So you fork over a less expensive Edler to improve our forwards and then our D looks like this:
Hamhuis Tanev
Sbisa Weber
Corrado Bieksa
With nobody of note coming up....
I don't see how that helps us |
|
kaptaan
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Turning a new Leaf, CA Joined: 09.29.2010
|
|
|
Boston asked for Edler - VANTEL
We should have done Edler and Bieksa for a first and two seconds... |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
http://www.nhl.com/ice/draftsearch.htm?year=2015&team=&position=&round=2
10am eastern - hillbillydeluxe
Perfect! Doesn't kill our Saturday |
|
Beachcomber
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Left Coast, BC Joined: 12.01.2013
|
|
|
So you fork over a less expensive Edler to improve our forwards and then our D looks like this:
Hamhuis Tanev
Sbisa Weber
Corrado Bieksa
With nobody of note coming up....
I don't see how that helps us - bezz44
That defensive lineup is even more depressing than I first thought. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
I really do hope our team doesn't over achieve in the regular season again. I'd rather see them squeak into the playoffs barely then over achieve...
If our division improves, we rebuild off their success. Accept where this team is at. People expect rookie GM's to hit home runs one after another? |
|
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC Joined: 05.29.2014
|
|
|
That defensive lineup is even more depressing than I first thought. - Beachcomber
It's borderline AHL |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 Next |