|
|
So you fork over a less expensive Edler to improve our forwards and then our D looks like this:
Hamhuis Tanev
Sbisa Weber
Corrado Bieksa
With nobody of note coming up....
I don't see how that helps us - bezz44
I will repeat this one more time. I am not in any way a fan of Edler. At all. There are many parts of his game that I really can't stand.
I think he tries to play a safe D . I think he is a chicken. I think he makes way too many mistakes. I hate his predidictable drop pass. I think he is uncreative. The only thing I like about him is he has value in a trade. |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
That defensive lineup is even more depressing than I first thought. - Beachcomber
That defense can't be the finished product. |
|
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC Joined: 05.29.2014
|
|
|
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC Joined: 05.29.2014
|
|
|
I will repeat this one more time. I am not in any way a fan of Edler. At all. There are many parts of his game that I really can't stand.
I think he tries to play a safe D . I think he is a chicken. I think he makes way too many mistakes. I hate his predidictable drop pass. I think he is uncreative. The only thing I like about him is he has value in a trade. - VANTEL
That's fine I'm not his biggest fan either but how does Lucic for Edler make things any better? Edler has value in a trade so why do you gut the defense for 1 year of a risky and moody PWF? Send him away for picks/prospects. Unless you legitimately think that our D is no worse off with Sbisa playing top 4 minutes |
|
|
|
I am not an Edler fan and would have traded him without blinking. I have been very very very very very consistent about that all along , never changed my mind once . Never
Never
Never - VANTEL
I will vouch for that. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
I think Bieksa to SJ is in play still. In the end, the second plus free cap space looks good. |
|
|
|
That's fine I'm not his biggest fan either but how does Lucic for Edler make things any better? Edler has value in a trade so why do you gut the defense for 1 year of a risky and moody PWF? Send him away for picks/prospects. Unless you legitimately think that our D is no worse off with Sbisa playing top 4 minutes - bezz44
LUcic helps in the toughness area and can score as his stats prove. Visiting teams come here and think it is a vacation stop.
I can't think of any team that comes to Vancouver and thinks damn we have to play the Canucks. In fact most teams think lets go to the Roxy and get poopFaced ,it's only the Canucks |
|
|
|
I will repeat this one more time. I am not in any way a fan of Edler. At all. There are many parts of his game that I really can't stand.
I think he tries to play a safe D . I think he is a chicken. I think he makes way too many mistakes. I hate his predidictable drop pass. I think he is uncreative. The only thing I like about him is he has value in a trade. - VANTEL
His size is not utilized. When he plays mean he is effective. |
|
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC Joined: 05.29.2014
|
|
|
I think Bieksa to SJ is in play still. In the end, the second plus free cap space looks good. - boonerbuck
I wouldn't have expected him to return a second so that would be awesome. McGuire mentioned on 1040 that he expected the return to be a 3-4th rounder which was my expectation |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
That's fine I'm not his biggest fan either but how does Lucic for Edler make things any better? Edler has value in a trade so why do you gut the defense for 1 year of a risky and moody PWF? Send him away for picks/prospects. Unless you legitimately think that our D is no worse off with Sbisa playing top 4 minutes - bezz44
Lucic is overkill if we need protection. Lucic if we are building a winner makes sense. We can get someone suckier to add muscle.
|
|
|
|
LUcic helps in the toughness area and can score as his stats prove. Visiting teams come here and think it is a vacation stop.
I can't think of any team that comes to Vancouver and thinks damn we have to play the Canucks. In fact most teams think lets go to the Roxy and get poopFaced ,it's only the Canucks - VANTEL
He wil poop the bed this season and be in our line up via free agency 2017. |
|
|
|
His size is not utilized. When he plays mean he is effective. - thundachunk
He doesn't play mean . Give me Despress Dillon England for less money any day |
|
|
|
I wouldn't have expected him to return a second so that would be awesome. McGuire mentioned on 1040 that he expected the return to be a 3-4th rounder which was my expectation - bezz44
No way he's worth a second easily. |
|
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Not Quesnel, BC Joined: 10.11.2005
|
|
|
I wouldn't have expected him to return a second so that would be awesome. McGuire mentioned on 1040 that he expected the return to be a 3-4th rounder which was my expectation - bezz44
If they cant get a 2nd, Id wait to the TDL. Problem is, KB is usually injured through the TDL.
|
|
|
|
Lucic is overkill if we need protection. Lucic if we are building a winner makes sense. We can get someone suckier to add muscle. - boonerbuck
We have someone sucker with muscle but is always injured or on the sauce. |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
His size is not utilized. When he plays mean he is effective. - thundachunk
When he plays mean, he hurts his back. |
|
Beachcomber
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Left Coast, BC Joined: 12.01.2013
|
|
|
That defense can't be the finished product. - hillbillydeluxe
Nope. It is missing Stanton. |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
We have someone sucker with muscle but is always injured or on the sauce. - thundachunk
|
|
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC Joined: 05.29.2014
|
|
|
LUcic helps in the toughness area and can score as his stats prove. Visiting teams come here and think it is a vacation stop.
I can't think of any team that comes to Vancouver and thinks damn we have to play the Canucks. In fact most teams think lets go to the Roxy and get poopFaced ,it's only the Canucks - VANTEL
I don't see how his stats prove anything about scoring. Coming off an 18 goal season with 44 points that is tweener territory. You want toughness? Resign Tom Sestito. I fail to see how throwing a goon on the ice fixes the defense. If you care so much about winning I'd think that would be the first place you'd look to fix. If the plan isn't to win now (which it shouldn't be) and you're trading Edler, then the return should be something that helps us later |
|
|
|
I wouldn't have expected him to return a second so that would be awesome. McGuire mentioned on 1040 that he expected the return to be a 3-4th rounder which was my expectation - bezz44
The rumour was there was 2x2nd round picks and Bieksa was going to be extended 4yrsx4.5 mil . One of the picks was a 2016 so Canucks nixed it. That is why I am pissed |
|
DariusKnight
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: "The Alien has landed in Vancouver!" Joined: 03.09.2006
|
|
|
LUcic helps in the toughness area and can score as his stats prove. Visiting teams come here and think it is a vacation stop.
I can't think of any team that comes to Vancouver and thinks damn we have to play the Canucks. In fact most teams think lets go to the Roxy and get poopFaced ,it's only the Canucks - VANTEL
Lucic isn't tough, he's a POS like Marchand, he plays dirty and because he's no longer on Boston, he won't get HALF the leniency the NHL gives Bruins players. You think we're hated because of Burrows and formerly Kesler and Lapierre, we'd be twice as hated with Lucic on our team. LA can have him, he's never been the same since the Stanley Cup season and he's wanting a raise on his 6 mil contract for 12 goals? No thanks. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
He doesn't play mean . Give me Despress Dillon England for less money any day - VANTEL
You'd trade Edler for Engelland. |
|
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I didn't read it , BC Joined: 09.21.2013
|
|
|
Nope. It is missing Stanton. - Beachcomber
|
|
bezz44
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Inside the scroatee, BC Joined: 05.29.2014
|
|
|
Lucic is overkill if we need protection. Lucic if we are building a winner makes sense. We can get someone suckier to add muscle. - boonerbuck
Exactly |
|
|
|
When he plays mean, he hurts his back. - hillbillydeluxe [/URL] |
|