He's a wienerhead?
- jochfr

A wienerhead with a NTC.

Good idea giving that guy a NTC.

I wonder who's cap he'll screw up next.

It wasn't that long ago, was it?
- buffalofan19

hell i don't remember i thought it was in the early 90s but maybe i am thinking of something else

Martin Jones wants to be or have a chance to be a number 1. He acquired him, most likely, as simply as an asset to flip.
- TheSabresTaco

How much of the goalie trade marke is left? San Jose?

Not at all, im only 27... his comment didnt make sense at all. LOL
- CoHo_to_B-Lo

i guess i am a little off.. i thought it was back at the begining of their careers like 1990 and thinking he would have had to be at least in his teens to remember put him in late 30s..

I feel confident in saying if the cap does not go up much for the 2016-2017 season, Crawford will be on the move.
- kingcong39

will someone take that contract? i sure wouldn't if i were a GM

i guess i am a little off.. i thought it was back at the begining of their careers like 1990 and thinking he would have had to be at least in his teens to remember put him in late 30s..
- IndianaSabresFan

It was 2000

Re-listening to Hockey Hotline and they all agree Foligno and a 2nd for Saad would be a fair offer WTF do these guys smoke?

How much of the goalie trade marke is left? San Jose?
- GilPerreault11

is Arizona looking? or do they want to suck one more year?

Carolina?
flyers?

It was 2000
- CoHo_to_B-Lo

ahh.. well then color me an idiot.

How much of the goalie trade marke is left? San Jose?
- GilPerreault11

If I'm Edmonton, Calgary, Buffalo or SJ, I bring him in to compete for #1.

I guess my order of importance would be:

1. SJ - Just have a backup, Stalock. Probably easiest to win that battle.
2. Edmonton - Just get rid of Scrivens already and have Talbot and Jones compete.
3. Calgary - Compete with the 34 y/o Hiller. He could, and should likely, be gone next year.
4. Buffalo - Compete with Lehner. Not advised, that'd be two high priced goalie acquisitions and you'll have to end up trading one.

is Arizona looking? or do they want to suck one more year?

Carolina?
flyers?
- IndianaSabresFan

AZ's got Mike Smith 4 Lyf
Canes have Lack now and another year of (frank)ing Ward. Bringing in Jones doesn't make sense this year.
Flyers love them their Mason.

If I'm Edmonton, Calgary, Buffalo or SJ, I bring him in to compete for #1.

I guess my order of importance would be:

1. SJ - Just have a backup, Stalock. Probably easiest to win that battle.
2. Edmonton - Just get rid of Scrivens already and have Talbot and Jones compete.
3. Calgary - Compete with the 34 y/o Hiller. He could, and should likely, be gone next year.
4. Buffalo - Compete with Lehner. Not advised, that'd be two high priced goalie acquisitions and you'll have to end up trading one.
- TheSabresTaco

I could see SJ and Calgary...Edmonton has their goalie, not spending more assets on one, Sabres don't want to (frank) up Lehner's head to compete and also spend assets.

I'd offer sheet him 7 year 35 mil

your out a first and a third for a fixture on your top six for the next 7 years
- homiedclown

Absolutely.

AZ's got Mike Smith 4 Lyf
Canes have Lack now and another year of (frank)ing Ward. Bringing in Jones doesn't make sense this year.
Flyers love them their Mason.
- TheSabresTaco

i didn't realize carolina got lack..

well i can't think of anyone else except maybe TO or Dallas

AZ's got Mike Smith 4 Lyf
Canes have Lack now and another year of (frank)ing Ward. Bringing in Jones doesn't make sense this year.
Flyers love them their Mason.
- TheSabresTaco

Smith had a bad year, but other than that he's been good for Arizona. He actually turned his season around late too. They could very well have finished last had he not.

I've liked Mason since he got to Philly. He's looked much better. I guess finding out your chest protector wasn't the proper size could help make a difference though.

i didn't realize carolina got lack..

well i can't think of anyone else except maybe TO or Dallas
- IndianaSabresFan

Dallas currently has $10.4M tied up in Niemi and Lehtonen and according to Jim Nill, they plan on keeping both and having them split time and push one another.

I think he forgot Lindy was his coach.

i didn't realize carolina got lack..

well i can't think of anyone else except maybe TO or Dallas
- IndianaSabresFan

For about the same cost as the Bruins paid for Rinaldo.

Dallas currently has $10.4M tied up in Niemi and Lehtonen and according to Jim Nill, they plan on keeping both and having them split time and push one another.

I think he forgot Lindy was his coach.
- HonkFortheGoose

yeah i forgot about niemi.. there has been too much goalie movement to keep up

For about the same cost as the Bruins paid for Rinaldo.
- BINGO!

seems similar

Martin Jones to San Jose? Wow! Wonder what they gave up?

Re-listening to Hockey Hotline and they all agree Foligno and a 2nd for Saad would be a fair offer WTF do these guys smoke?
- GilPerreault11

Henry's sh!t

Martin Jones to San Jose? Wow! Wonder what they gave up?
- Lilroot9

With Sweeney in charge it's probably a 2017 second rounder...

If I'm Edmonton, Calgary, Buffalo or SJ, I bring him in to compete for #1.

I guess my order of importance would be:

1. SJ - Just have a backup, Stalock. Probably easiest to win that battle.
2. Edmonton - Just get rid of Scrivens already and have Talbot and Jones compete.
3. Calgary - Compete with the 34 y/o Hiller. He could, and should likely, be gone next year.
4. Buffalo - Compete with Lehner. Not advised, that'd be two high priced goalie acquisitions and you'll have to end up trading one.
- TheSabresTaco

Well done since he was just traded to the Sharks, I am sure the Kings aren't happy after they sent him to the east...

Martin Jones for John Scott. (E5)

Well done since he was just traded to the Sharks, I am sure the Kings aren't happy after they sent him to the east...
- Stripes77

I bet they did not want him in SJ, should have put in contract that he could not be flipped to West. Damn.