gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown Joined: 02.19.2009
|
|
|
Your not. Leafs give up a 2nd ( 31-35?) for a late first ( 16-25?) and a late 3rd. - HonkyTonkMan
Nah, PITT's 2nd, which will be 50+ |
|
|
|
Your not. Leafs give up a 2nd ( 31-35?) for a late first ( 16-25?) and a late 3rd. - HonkyTonkMan
its the pens pick. so yeah 30 picks in difference, not 5-10 |
|
mykokes
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: RELEASE THE LATVIAN!, ON Joined: 11.09.2009
|
|
|
because you left aside Leafs also trade a former 1st and a 2nd. and you forget what were the expectations. - fidopro
I'm seeing a lot of fans from other teams coming on here and saying its a bad trade...and I agree with them. But one observation, the fans from other teams also said we weren't getting poop for Kessel.....so it surprises me that they're saying now its a bad trade lol. |
|
|
|
So Toronto 2nd basically cancels the Pitt 1st.
Erixon is better than Harrington.
Biggs is a dump but will probably become Lucic now.
So Kessel got Kapanen and a third with 1.2 retained. - Iggysbff
there it is
|
|
dmnted
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Rented to Bruce Banner ;) Joined: 08.30.2006
|
|
|
Your not. Leafs give up a 2nd ( 31-35?) for a late first ( 16-25?) and a late 3rd. - HonkyTonkMan
so they'll have Pitts 1, 2, & 3rd next year. |
|
Lee Denault
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Time to get Schwifty Joined: 11.16.2007
|
|
|
so who won the Kessel trade, Bruins or Leafs ? - vermie22
Bruins won the cup |
|
BoTtLePoLiCe
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: London, ON Joined: 12.30.2013
|
|
|
Your not. Leafs give up a 2nd ( 31-35?) for a late first ( 16-25?) and a late 3rd. - HonkyTonkMan
isn't it pitts second? |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
And this is why I say its brutal. the 2nd wipes out the 1st we're getting. Which means kessel for kapanen and harrington. - mykokes
what? we gave up their 2nd which is like a 40th pick overall probably and we got their 1st...around #20 and a #3 pick 60th ( approx. ) |
|
Iggysbff
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
|
Location: Peter Chiarelli is a fking moron, Calgary, AB Joined: 07.12.2012
|
|
|
Not again.
PITTS 2nd - iTOLDu
Yup I edited. |
|
ClarksonDavid
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Rielly wouldn't, crack top 4 on the sens team -PtotheY, SK Joined: 03.15.2014
|
|
|
I was never going to be happy with the return for kessel. Which leafs didn't trade the 2nd back but whatever, kappanen has the potential to be a really nice piece. Our forward prospects are stacked... |
|
daeth
Colorado Avalanche |
|
|
Location: 43 points, ON Joined: 09.15.2005
|
|
|
so who won the Kessel trade, Bruins or Leafs ? - vermie22
good question. it's close |
|
|
|
Not again.
PITTS 2nd - iTOLDu
yep. presumably to offersheet |
|
Lee Denault
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Time to get Schwifty Joined: 11.16.2007
|
|
|
I'm seeing a lot of fans from other teams coming on here and saying its a bad trade...and I agree with them. But one observation, the fans from other teams also said we weren't getting poop for Kessel.....so it surprises me that they're saying now its a bad trade lol. - mykokes
|
|
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON Joined: 02.28.2011
|
|
|
Bigzby
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Inside Candymouth, NV Joined: 07.06.2011
|
|
|
there it is
- robin_steele264
If nothing posts nothing and no one reads nothing did anything post at all? |
|
bobbyisno1
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I'm excited to see that Joined: 08.28.2010
|
|
|
so they'll have Pitts 1, 2, & 3rd next year. - dmnted
they gave Pitts' 2nd back |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
So Toronto 2nd basically cancels the Pitt 1st.
Erixon is better than Harrington.
Biggs is a dump but will probably become Lucic now.
So Kessel got Kapanen and a third with 1.2 retained.
Edit. See it's Pitts old second so not equal. But still... - Iggysbff
exactly
How are you still breathing? |
|
Lee Denault
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Time to get Schwifty Joined: 11.16.2007
|
|
|
I was never going to be happy with the return for kessel. Which leafs didn't trade the 2nd back but whatever, kappanen has the potential to be a really nice piece. Our forward prospects are stacked... - ClarksonDavid
...its like were rebuilding or something....
|
|
|
|
|
|
So Toronto 2nd basically cancels the Pitt 1st.
Erixon is better than Harrington.
Biggs is a dump but will probably become Lucic now.
So Kessel got Kapanen and a third with 1.2 retained.
Edit. See it's Pitts old second so not equal. But still... - Iggysbff
pick 50 will cancel pick 20?
erixon who was on waivers better than pittsburghs 2nd best d prospect
biggs....hell no
I think you need a time out
aslo werent u suggesting bolland and a first? |
|
Zezel
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: God Leafs Satan The Oneness, ON Joined: 02.28.2011
|
|
|
I love the trade
We also have 5MM more cap space now then we started with including the signings of PAP and hunwick - Bigzby
|
|
mykokes
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: RELEASE THE LATVIAN!, ON Joined: 11.09.2009
|
|
|
- Lee Denault
Iggybf as an example. |
|
HonkyTonkMan
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: Home to ruined prospects and overpaid slugs', AB Joined: 06.10.2015
|
|
|
its the pens pick. so yeah 30 picks in difference, not 5-10 - GardinerExpress
I see. In that case that's an improvement. |
|
Smitty98
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 02.16.2012
|
|
|
I really feel bad for the Orlando Solar Bears.......... losing Biggs....... that's going to really hurt them and their third line |
|
mykokes
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: RELEASE THE LATVIAN!, ON Joined: 11.09.2009
|
|
|
They dont know it the Pens 2nd...Didn't know it was traded to the leafs... - Fruitcakenipple
Even still, I don't understand why we're giving up that pick. Essentially removes harrington from the trade. |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 Next |