gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown Joined: 02.19.2009
|
|
|
Right but we got two prospects with that 1st and roster player - TonkaPhaneuf
He's part of the Biggs/Erixson move. I look at it like two deals: Kessel for Kapanen, Spaling, and a 1st;
Biggs/Erixson for 1.2M in cap (miniscule)
Harrington and a late 3rd for a late 2nd. |
|
The Shrike
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Toronto Joined: 11.17.2007
|
|
|
$20 million in cap space and rising. |
|
|
|
|
|
I don't like throwing cap away. Cap space is always valuable. I completely disagree with your stance, but respect your opinion. - systemtool
What's worse than the fact that they have to retain 1.2m is that you can only retain salary on 3 contracts at a time so with gunnarson still on the books and now Phil it will limit us to only be able to retain on 1 contract at the deadline which would of help maximize value on pending UFA's |
|
|
|
$20 million in cap space and rising. - The Shrike
SPEND IT ALL NOW!!!!!
|
|
systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON Joined: 09.12.2007
|
|
|
$20 million in cap space and rising. - The Shrike
Exciting
Let's overpay the next guy! |
|
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC Joined: 08.10.2008
|
|
|
I didn't hear either...I though maybe Belesky for the right price or??? - Garnie
Prust and a 5th apparently |
|
|
|
Funny how that works... - Fruitcakenipple
Biggs is terrible
|
|
Smitty98
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 02.16.2012
|
|
|
SPEND IT ALL NOW!!!!! - robin_steele264
20 mill a year for 8 years for Belesky |
|
aminnes
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Mrs. Buzzkill, AB Joined: 12.17.2008
|
|
|
still, better him gone than staying - fidopro
Of course... Thanks JFJ, I mean No-ness for your ridiculous contracts.... |
|
gravyface
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I wouldn't even trade [Marner] for McDavid -- UsernameUnknown Joined: 02.19.2009
|
|
|
Biggs is terrible - robin_steele264
LUCIC 4.0! |
|
Smitty98
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 02.16.2012
|
|
|
Biggs is terrible - robin_steele264
His ECHL coach spoke very highly of him |
|
|
|
His ECHL coach spoke very highly of him - Smitty98
lol
|
|
Landsbergfan
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Gävle, Sweden Joined: 07.15.2014
|
|
|
What deal would NONIS have got compared to the 3 headed monster Shena,Hunter,Dumboss |
|
Aetherial
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Has anyone discussed the standings today? Joined: 06.30.2006
|
|
|
still, better him gone than staying - fidopro
Ultimately that is the primary concern.
It was not a good "hockey trade" just like Marincin was not a good hockey trade for Edmonton, but Edmonton really needed to make sure they get tougher and the Leafs really needed to break up this core.
|
|
Pen15
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 06.01.2011
|
|
|
nbboy
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.05.2010
|
|
|
Leafs got futures... what the wanted.
Hybryd rebuild my butt!
Good deal for Leafs - robin_steele264
Agree |
|
Lee Denault
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Time to get Schwifty Joined: 11.16.2007
|
|
|
Rielly - Harrington
Can turn into a nice pairing - LeafsFan23
Harrington will most likely be a 4-5-6-7 guy |
|
Tee-Dot
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: For being Stee's alternate personality or being associated with M. Night Shyamalan? Joined: 12.11.2008
|
|
|
Hello Boston? Hi. This is Toronto. See, we can be just like you in the aspect that we also give away our talented players for buckets of PFK too.
We need a GM quick before Texas Instruments gives away our entire team.
I mean retain (frank)ing salary and we STILL couldn't get Rattamatattaa?!?! Un(frank)ing real. Leafs are (frank)ing pathetic like usual.
|
|
fidopro
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Service Temporarily Unavailable, QC Joined: 08.10.2008
|
|
|
Ultimately that is the primary concern.
It was not a good "hockey trade" just like Marincin was not a good hockey trade for Edmonton, but Edmonton really needed to make sure they get tougher and the Leafs really needed to break up this core. - Aetherial
yep, and should have done so years ago. better late then never! |
|
Aetherial
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Has anyone discussed the standings today? Joined: 06.30.2006
|
|
|
it was expected to eat 2M?!?!? where? when? no way we eat salary on a Kessel trade is what I read here. Phaneuf maybe, but not Kessel...
bottom line, if that exact trade has been proposed tou you here last week, everyone of you would have said no. don't kid yourself. - fidopro
I would have said "no".
Oh well. They got what they could. There is no sense being upset about it now. We need to move on and look forward to some crap being moved out hopefully.
|
|
aminnes
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Mrs. Buzzkill, AB Joined: 12.17.2008
|
|
|
What's worse than the fact that they have to retain 1.2m is that you can only retain salary on 3 contracts at a time so with gunnarson still on the books and now Phil it will limit us to only be able to retain on 1 contract at the deadline which would of help maximize value on pending UFA's - HealthyScratch6
Yup, retaining was a terrible decision. 7 years.... |
|
Smitty98
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 02.16.2012
|
|
|
worst. trade. ever. - Pen15
The Kassian trade? Let's wait to hear what the habs gave up first |
|
LeafsFan23
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: He's big, he's bald, he's Alex Auld, ON Joined: 07.23.2009
|
|
|
Did we end up signing p.a parenteau. Tsn claims we did for 1 yr but I haven't seen anything $ wise or reporting. |
|
orienbrady22
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Windsor, ON Joined: 02.14.2013
|
|
|
D+ Trade... Kapanen is not some elite prospect like many trying to make him out to be.. Harrington is meh, but to retain salary is just plain stupid.
Leafs should have traded Bozak first and hoped Kessel added some more teams to his trade list.
In good shape for a top 3 pick though |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 Next |