nbboy
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.05.2010
|
|
|
This is true. Again though, its not the return as much as the kickers we gave the Pens back. ie. the 2nd round pick and 1.25M retained. - mykokes
What about the 3rd rounder and not taking back a dump |
|
bobbyisno1
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I'm excited to see that Joined: 08.28.2010
|
|
|
Because I have a differing opinion. - ThePresident
because you insult everyone here, every fifth post |
|
mykokes
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: RELEASE THE LATVIAN!, ON Joined: 11.09.2009
|
|
|
Meh, Kessel being gone is a small plus on its own. Everything else is a bonus.
Chill and hang on for about 2 more crummy seasons - Garnie
I'm expecting 4 to 5. Which is fine. Drafting Marners can be fun! |
|
Big_Lightnin
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Pain is coming Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
no, because you call people sheep and sound like a certain UG.
For the record, I share your opinion on the trade.
And to answer Peca fan fan, its not what we got back in the trade so much that I have the problem with, its that we still had to eat 1.25M and send a 2nd round pick back. Which to me is dumb. - mykokes
I would rather have taken Scuderi than retain anything, but $1.2M isn't terrible... $2M would have been absurd. |
|
mykokes
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: RELEASE THE LATVIAN!, ON Joined: 11.09.2009
|
|
|
What about the #3 and not taking back a dump - nbboy
Not really satisfied with that. Meh, I've moved on after debating this today anyways....now i wait for the Bozak trade |
|
The Law
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 01.29.2008
|
|
|
no, because you call people sheep and sound like a certain UG.
For the record, I share your opinion on the trade.
And to answer Peca fan fan, its not what we got back in the trade so much that I have the problem with, its that we still had to eat 1.25M and send a 2nd round pick back. Which to me is dumb. - mykokes
The only alternative was to keep PK. And I'm not sure how anybody can be certain that would be a better plan. |
|
mr.sir
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Vancouver Island, BC Joined: 01.18.2015
|
|
|
Best player this team has ever employed. - BetterCallSaul
Judas!!
Wendel #1 |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
I'm expecting 4 to 5. Which is fine. Drafting Marners can be fun! - mykokes
Meh, in the 3rd year I think we could make the playoffs
Look at some of the young teams that surprise...almost every year. |
|
Bigzby
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Inside Candymouth, NV Joined: 07.06.2011
|
|
|
President doesn't insult me. If he thinks I'm a sheep because I like a trade who gives a poop.
We will never all agree on something. Guaranteed lol. |
|
The Law
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 01.29.2008
|
|
|
So hang on to him- for now.
What was the hurry? - Atomic Wedgie
2016 draft ….2017 draft ….
|
|
mykokes
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: RELEASE THE LATVIAN!, ON Joined: 11.09.2009
|
|
|
The only alternative was to keep PK. And I'm not sure how anybody can be certain that would be a better plan. - The Law
Babcock might have thought it was a better plan. Meh. Onto the Mitch Marner era! |
|
Big_Lightnin
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Pain is coming Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
Ya the lottery protection is my only beef with the trade. - Bigzby
Ya... Would like to have seen it be "actually lottery protected" ie if that pick won the lottery, they give us 2017. But if that pick ended up anything but top 3, it's Leafs.
I don't see Pens missing though. |
|
InTheWood
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: collingwood, ON Joined: 07.01.2015
|
|
|
Not really satisfied with that. Meh, I've moved on after debating this today anyways....now i wait for the Bozak trade - mykokes
On that note, is there any serious rumors (perhaps true) about him and what type of return we can expect? JVR? Dion? |
|
Bigzby
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Inside Candymouth, NV Joined: 07.06.2011
|
|
|
I would rather have taken Scuderi than retain anything, but $1.2M isn't terrible... $2M would have been absurd. - Big_Lightnin
Exactly. It's the equivalent of a matt hunwick. |
|
mr.sir
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Vancouver Island, BC Joined: 01.18.2015
|
|
|
President doesn't insult me. If he thinks I'm a sheep because I like a trade who gives a poop.
We will never all agree on something. Guaranteed lol. - Bigzby
can we at least all agree that Steve Simmons is the biggest douche in TO? |
|
Bigzby
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Inside Candymouth, NV Joined: 07.06.2011
|
|
|
Ya... Would like to have seen it be "actually lottery protected" ie if that pick won the lottery, they give us 2017. But if that pick ended up anything but top 3, it's Leafs.
I don't see Pens missing though. - Big_Lightnin
I do they have no Defense.
But the lottery protection is baffling. I agree with your idea, it's what I'd of worst case like to have seen. |
|
mr.sir
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Vancouver Island, BC Joined: 01.18.2015
|
|
|
3.25m for J Williams is pretty cheap |
|
Bigzby
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Inside Candymouth, NV Joined: 07.06.2011
|
|
|
can we at least all agree that Steve Simmons is the biggest douche in TO? - mr.sir
I don't mind him when he's not purposely trolling.
Mirtle on the other hand I can't stand. |
|
The Law
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 01.29.2008
|
|
|
Babcock might have thought it was a better plan. Meh. Onto the Mitch Marner era! - mykokes
Babcock was pretty clear in his initial interviews that he wanted this. He said he essentially interviewed the Leafs to make sure that they really were committed to the pain of a true rebuild (draft and develop). |
|
BetterCallSaul
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Captain Morgan Rielly Joined: 05.07.2013
|
|
|
Cant say I disagree. - Bigzby
Can't say I can tell you you're wrong. |
|
Big_Lightnin
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Pain is coming Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
I do they have no Defense.
But the lottery protection is baffling. I agree with your idea, it's what I'd of worst case like to have seen. - Bigzby
Offendwe will make up for it though. Not saying they are a cup contender, but they will make the playoffs. Gonna rack up a poop ton of goals. |
|
Bigzby
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Inside Candymouth, NV Joined: 07.06.2011
|
|
|
On that note, is there any serious rumors (perhaps true) about him and what type of return we can expect? JVR? Dion? - InTheWood
I said this when he extended, wait a few years and the contract will be beautiful.
We're almost there. I don't like him as captain but I'd keep him at least 1 more year.
JVR you can move anytime as his contract is unreal, only thing is his production may take a huge poop and kill some value. |
|
Phenom
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: TITS baby, TITS - Trust In The Shanaplan, ON Joined: 08.12.2010
|
|
|
Ya the lottery protection is my only beef with the trade. - Bigzby
I concur. Should have been lottery protection with the 2nd back if they miss playoffs OR salary retention. Not both |
|
PatC80
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: 1st rd exit is the new normal, ON Joined: 08.11.2011
|
|
|
This is true. Again though, its not the return as much as the kickers we gave the Pens back. ie. the 2nd round pick and 1.25M retained. - mykokes
I'm not a fan of the salary retention but I can live with it. We saw this past weekend that it's kinda easy to get 2nd rd picks. They gave Pitt theirs back. |
|
mr.sir
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Vancouver Island, BC Joined: 01.18.2015
|
|
|
I said this when he extended, wait a few years and the contract will be beautiful.
We're almost there. I don't like him as captain but I'd keep him at least 1 more year.
JVR you can move anytime as his contract is unreal, only thing is his production may take a huge poop and kill some value. - Bigzby
Take it easy..
JVR Bozak Parenteau will light it up |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121 Next |