JVR for BSchenn and Mac
- vejim

JVR for B Schenn and AMac?

I'd do that

JVR for BSchenn and Mac
- vejim

Yes

JVR for B Schenn and AMac?

I'd do that
- BiggE

+1

But Toronto wouldn't do that.

Its no good no matter what you do but I also have 0 interest in Lupul. I know Gardiner's contract is a nightmare. But to say he isn't worth anything isn't fair. I was trying to humour the kid. Substituting Laughton and Manning for Coots is an obvious win for Philly but overall...


I wouldn't do either trade.
Shoot, I wouldn't trade B Schenn for Kadri straight up, at best it is a wash and at worst we get softer.
- coffee junkie

That trade even with Laughton isn't an obvious win, in any manner. Not sure why so many are downgrading Laughton as a prospect.

No interest in giving up real assets for Gardiner. Not interested in B. Schenn + Laughton for Kadri, even with the Vinny cap dump.

You basically took the other deal, substituted Laughton and Manning for Couturier and removed Lupul from Toronto's end. I'm not sure if I like that more or less.
- jmatchett383

Listen, I know +- isnt the greatest stat in the world, but a -24 has to speak volumes... especially for a d-man.

That trade even with Laughton isn't an obvious win, in any manner. Not sure why so many are downgrading Laughton as a prospect.
- MJL

Well its pretty obvious that he will never be productive offensively. the kid will be lucky to make it off of the 4th line in the future... if he even has one.

+1

But Toronto wouldn't do that.
- Streit2ThePoint

Yeah, you would think, but OTOH, we are talking about the Leafs

Well its pretty obvious that he will never be productive offensively. the kid will be lucky to make it off of the 4th line in the future... if he even has one.
- jak521

Its no good no matter what you do but I also have 0 interest in Lupul. I know Gardiner's contract is a nightmare. But to say he isn't worth anything isn't fair. I was trying to humour the kid. Substituting Laughton and Manning for Coots is an obvious win for Philly but overall...


I wouldn't do either trade.
Shoot, I wouldn't trade B Schenn for Kadri straight up, at best it is a wash and at worst we get softer.
- coffee junkie

I didn't say he had no value, just that I wouldn't give up "real assets" for him. By that, I mean no B-grade or better prospects, top-9/core forwards, and no picks in the first 3 rounds. If they want to trade him for Vinny, Mathers, and a 5th, I'm all for it.

JVR for B Schenn and AMac?

I'd do that
- BiggE

In a heartbeat

Yeah, you would think, but OTOH, we are talking about the Leafs

- BiggE

tis true

Couturier + Schenn brothers + Lecavalier

for

Lupul, Kadri and Gardiner
- MaximusAurelius

Just because you got a 30 goal scoring power forward for a 6th dman, doesn't mean you can pull off another heist. Holmgren is scrubbing the poopters at the WFC now. There is a new sheriff in town!!!

- MJL

Well its pretty obvious that he will never be productive offensively. the kid will be lucky to make it off of the 4th line in the future... if he even has one.
- jak521

I put him in the trade proposal because the TOR poster needed something other then Coots and the organization has three good young centers not named Laughton. This was prior to seeing Gardiner's contract which is horrendous. I think he will be a fine third line center someday. I am actually pretty high on him though I don't think he is in the line up next year unless some trades are made. Too many dead corpses with their anchoring cap hits to jump.

Just because you got a 30 goal scoring power forward for a 6th dman, doesn't mean you can pull off another heist. Holmgren is scrubbing the poopters at the WFC now. There is a new sheriff in town!!!


- PLindbergh31

would love to see Hexy coach the goalies

would love to see Hexy coach the goalies
- vejim

GM/goalie coach..... Not sure that is in the cards Vej. Had a good thing going with Reese. Hopefully Kim Dillabaugh continues Mason on his upward trajectory.

I put him in the trade proposal because the TOR poster needed something other then Coots and the organization has three good young centers not named Laughton. This was prior to seeing Gardiner's contract which is horrendous. I think he will be a fine third line center someday. I am actually pretty high on him though I don't think he is in the line up next year unless some trades are made. Too many dead corpses with their anchoring cap hits to jump.
- coffee junkie

I was teasing... A lot of people on here kinda got real down on him because he didnt light it up on the stat sheet while he had his chance here. I think he is gonna be a very good 3rd line center who can play 2nd PP unit/PK duties. I like that.. kinda like a Colin Wilson type of player..

Just because you got a 30 goal scoring power forward for a 6th dman, doesn't mean you can pull off another heist. Holmgren is scrubbing the poopters at the WFC now. There is a new sheriff in town!!!


- PLindbergh31

I was teasing... A lot of people on here kinda got real down on him because he didnt light it up on the stat sheet while he had his chance here. I think he is gonna be a very good 3rd line center who can play 2nd PP unit/PK duties. I like that.. kinda like a Colin Wilson type of player..
- jak521

I personally think Laughton's high upside is 2nd line center potential. I think he has the potential to be a 50 point 2 way center. If not, and his point totals wind up lower and he's just a strong 3rd line center, that's great also. I think Laughton is frequently shortchanged as a prospect.

New blob!

Is 5'11 185lb a power forward...in golf?
- jmatchett383

Good question. I say...YES. Tiger Woods is a power forward in golf.