Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Jan Levine: Chris Kreider: Rangers Need to Take Leap of Faith and Sign Him Long Term
Author Message
MeanestOfTimes
New York Rangers
Location: Huntington, NY
Joined: 03.19.2012

Aug 6 @ 9:16 PM ET
Jesus, that guys seems to have been around forever.
- mdw7413

Think his year with the Rangers he led the team in times getting Sam excited by driving to the net, then crashing into the side of it, while at best getting off a no-chance backhander.
jimbro83
New York Rangers
Location: Lets Go Rangers!, NY
Joined: 12.25.2009

Aug 7 @ 6:30 AM ET
Unless that defense improves I still don't think Pittsburgh is going to better than the Rangers or Islanders.
- MidnightMarauder


I still can't believe the Penguins traded Simon Despres for Ben Lovejoy

That is such a ridiculously bad trade it's not even funny
RangerFan1110
New York Rangers
Location: Orlando, FL
Joined: 01.30.2012

Aug 7 @ 8:03 AM ET
Stepan + McIlrath for Eric Staal?
- rangerdanger94


No thanks and No way!!!!!
RangerFan1110
New York Rangers
Location: Orlando, FL
Joined: 01.30.2012

Aug 7 @ 8:06 AM ET
McIlrath for a 9th round pick.
- Pete V


Or a bag of pucks. I can't believe the Rangers passed up on Kevin Hayes, Vladimir Tarasenko, Emerson Etem, Cam Fowler!!!!
RangerFan1110
New York Rangers
Location: Orlando, FL
Joined: 01.30.2012

Aug 7 @ 8:08 AM ET
Or a bag of pucks. I can't believe the Rangers passed up on Kevin Hayes, Vladimir Tarasenko, Emerson Etem, Cam Fowler!!!!
- RangerFan1110


and passed on Justin Faulk and Oscar Lindberg
RangerFan1110
New York Rangers
Location: Orlando, FL
Joined: 01.30.2012

Aug 7 @ 8:10 AM ET
Kreider at $4M x 6
- As_I_See_It


Watch Kreider demand for 5.5 6M you will see he will hold out right to Arbitration!
jimbro83
New York Rangers
Location: Lets Go Rangers!, NY
Joined: 12.25.2009

Aug 7 @ 8:13 AM ET
Watch Kreider demand for 5.5 6M you will see he will hold out right to Arbitration!
- RangerFan1110


if he does, that means he had a great year
TPC
New York Rangers
Location: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 01.18.2008

Aug 7 @ 9:35 AM ET
I wonder when the Rangers will release their roster for the Traverse City Prospect Tournament next month
RAGSareDANGERus
New York Rangers
Joined: 05.22.2013

Aug 7 @ 10:26 AM ET
Sounds like it was statutory rape for Kaner
mdw7413
New York Rangers
Location: I would rather see a dudes hairy balls than his hairy feet-Jimbro
Joined: 12.13.2013

Aug 7 @ 10:34 AM ET
Sounds like it was statutory rape for Kaner
- RAGSareDANGERus



Find that rumor hard to believe, since I believe the age of consent in NY is either 16-17, he would have had to slept with a 15-16 yr old.

If it is true, he should be locked up for a very long time.
RAGSareDANGERus
New York Rangers
Joined: 05.22.2013

Aug 7 @ 10:45 AM ET
Find that rumor hard to believe, since I believe the age of consent in NY is either 16-17, he would have had to slept with a 15-16 yr old.

If it is true, he should be locked up for a very long time.

- mdw7413

NY is 17 but federal law is 18 and federal law always trumps state law.
JohnnyNYR27
New York Rangers
Location: Astoria, NY
Joined: 03.28.2015

Aug 7 @ 10:46 AM ET
Find that rumor hard to believe, since I believe the age of consent in NY is either 16-17, he would have had to slept with a 15-16 yr old.

If it is true, he should be locked up for a very long time.

- mdw7413

Age of conent is 17, unless you're over 21, than it's stat rape.

Edit: Meaning it's ok legal wise dating a 17yo if you are under 21. Kane is not.
mdw7413
New York Rangers
Location: I would rather see a dudes hairy balls than his hairy feet-Jimbro
Joined: 12.13.2013

Aug 7 @ 10:48 AM ET
NY is 17 but federal law is 18 and federal law always trumps state law.
- RAGSareDANGERus



Actually that's not true, the federal law only applies if you cross state lines.
mdw7413
New York Rangers
Location: I would rather see a dudes hairy balls than his hairy feet-Jimbro
Joined: 12.13.2013

Aug 7 @ 10:50 AM ET
Age of conent is 17, unless you're over 21, than it's stat rape.

Edit: Meaning it's ok legal wise dating a 17yo if you are under 21. Kane is not.

- JohnnyNYR27



I thought the 4 year age difference was under 17. Meaning once you are 17 you can consent to any adult.

Where the hell is PeteV , isnt he a lawyer?
Cptmjl
New York Islanders
Joined: 11.05.2011

Aug 7 @ 10:55 AM ET
Or a bag of pucks. I can't believe the Rangers passed up on Kevin Hayes, Vladimir Tarasenko, Emerson Etem, Cam Fowler!!!!
- RangerFan1110

Yeah he's been an awesome pick thus far
JohnnyNYR27
New York Rangers
Location: Astoria, NY
Joined: 03.28.2015

Aug 7 @ 10:55 AM ET
I thought the 4 year age difference was under 17. Meaning once you are 17 you can consent to any adult.

Where the hell is PeteV , isnt he a lawyer?

- mdw7413

I think you're right. 17 is fine.
Cptmjl
New York Islanders
Joined: 11.05.2011

Aug 7 @ 10:56 AM ET
Find that rumor hard to believe, since I believe the age of consent in NY is either 16-17, he would have had to slept with a 15-16 yr old.

If it is true, he should be locked up for a very long time.

- mdw7413

You seem very well versed on the subject.
JohnnyNYR27
New York Rangers
Location: Astoria, NY
Joined: 03.28.2015

Aug 7 @ 10:58 AM ET
You seem very well versed on the subject.
- Cptmjl

mdw7413
New York Rangers
Location: I would rather see a dudes hairy balls than his hairy feet-Jimbro
Joined: 12.13.2013

Aug 7 @ 10:58 AM ET
You seem very well versed on the subject.
- Cptmjl




Wait......that's (frank)ed up.

Blame tv crime shows.
Maskdman3
New York Rangers
Location: Gotham City, NY
Joined: 02.16.2007

Aug 7 @ 11:01 AM ET
You seem very well versed on the subject.
- Cptmjl


The way girls look/dress these days you damned well better be a the very least so you can educate the hell out of your kids.

None of us are as versed as Michael Bay as evidenced by this little gem from the last Transformers movie:

https://youtu.be/Cz9OgW4JAJ8
RAGSareDANGERus
New York Rangers
Joined: 05.22.2013

Aug 7 @ 11:02 AM ET
Actually that's not true, the federal law only applies if you cross state lines.
- mdw7413

Don't know if you're right. That's why the DEA carries out raids in Cali even though weed is legal in state law.

Edit: The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution. The supremacy clause contains what's known as the doctrine of pre-emption, which says that the federal government wins in the case of conflicting legislation. Basically, if a federal and state law contradict, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the feds can decide to stop you. When there is a conflict between a state law and federal law, it is the federal law that prevails.


Hahahahahahabaha suck it Matt hahahahahahahaha you suck
mdw7413
New York Rangers
Location: I would rather see a dudes hairy balls than his hairy feet-Jimbro
Joined: 12.13.2013

Aug 7 @ 11:06 AM ET
Don't know if you're right. That's why the DEA carries out raids in Cali even though weed is legal in state law.
- RAGSareDANGERus



If Federal law trumped state law all the time you would have the Feds investigating every crime. I'm sure there are certain circumstances where it might be true, but most of the time it has to be a crime across state lines.

Hence there would be no need for local state laws, and we would have a federal government that controlled everything.
RAGSareDANGERus
New York Rangers
Joined: 05.22.2013

Aug 7 @ 11:07 AM ET
If Federal law trumped state law all the time you would have the Feds investigating every crime. I'm sure there are certain circumstances where it might be true, but most of the time it has to be a crime across state lines.
- mdw7413

You're wrong hahahahahahahahahha
mdw7413
New York Rangers
Location: I would rather see a dudes hairy balls than his hairy feet-Jimbro
Joined: 12.13.2013

Aug 7 @ 11:08 AM ET
You're wrong hahahahahahahahahha
- RAGSareDANGERus



Well how can I argue with this logic.
RAGSareDANGERus
New York Rangers
Joined: 05.22.2013

Aug 7 @ 11:11 AM ET
Well how can I argue with this logic.
- mdw7413

The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution. The supremacy clause contains what's known as the doctrine of pre-emption, which says that the federal government wins in the case of conflicting legislation. Basically, if a federal and state law contradict, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the feds can decide to stop you. When there is a conflict between a state law and federal law, it is the federal law that prevails. For example, if a federal regulation prohibits the use of medical marijuana, but a state regulation allows it, the federal law prevails.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next