burn
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON Joined: 08.02.2006
|
|
|
Can't see the list, but apparently pronman has bracco really high...... Ahead of some pretty big names. |
|
LeafMan
|
|
|
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven Joined: 05.20.2007
|
|
|
Can't see the list, but apparently pronman has bracco really high...... Ahead of some pretty big names. - burn
I think he sees him as a Johnny Gaudreau clone. |
|
burn
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON Joined: 08.02.2006
|
|
|
I think he sees him as a Johnny Gaudreau clone. - LeafMan
Fine by me. |
|
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme Joined: 01.20.2009
|
|
|
the_eye
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Joined: 07.22.2012
|
|
|
Diameter of a 1 5/8" nail...yeah - that would work for you. - Woderwick
1"5/8 on a deck, building that sucker to last |
|
Adam French
Atlanta Thrashers |
|
|
Location: Isn't Cooley 5"11? You know who else is 5"11? Sydney Crosby. - Scabeh Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
The Leafs are mid October and then fizzle out. - LeafMan
Or terrible until a miracle run at the end of the year to ruin the draft pick |
|
Aetherial
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Has anyone discussed the standings today? Joined: 06.30.2006
|
|
|
Welp I just got a laid off work. Anyone wanna get stumbling drunk with me ? - TonkaPhaneuf
Sorry dude, that sucks. |
|
LeafMan
|
|
|
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven Joined: 05.20.2007
|
|
|
Does anyone else look at the Bruins roster and think they will be any good or will compete, their system has to be perfect for them to have any chance. |
|
|
|
I don't think he will ever recover. - LeafMan
It was the broken glass on his stove door that broke him. |
|
BingoLady
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Ultimate Warrior, NB Joined: 07.15.2009
|
|
|
The Jays will win the World Series the same day the Leafs are eliminated from the playoffs. Oct 28th. |
|
LeafMan
|
|
|
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven Joined: 05.20.2007
|
|
|
markmark
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 07.27.2010
|
|
|
Does anyone else look at the Bruins roster and think they will be any good or will compete, their system has to be perfect for them to have any chance. - LeafMan
I think they end up in the same spot as last year but closer to 85-90 points. |
|
Aetherial
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Has anyone discussed the standings today? Joined: 06.30.2006
|
|
|
PEAKS ALL THE WAY!!!
The Jays will win out the season.
i am going to go eat mexican while drinking beer
picnic style.
on the white house lawn.
with Jesus. - Dozzer
It was believable, until the end. No way Carey Price is picnicking with you.
|
|
markmark
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 07.27.2010
|
|
|
The Jays will win the World Series the same day the Leafs are eliminated from the playoffs. Oct 28th. - BingoLady
False. They will hold a joint parade for the World Series win alongside the Octo-Cup win! |
|
|
|
a soldering nightmare indeed - Dozzer
you melted the red wire.
and it a cold solder joint too. |
|
Aetherial
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Has anyone discussed the standings today? Joined: 06.30.2006
|
|
|
|
|
PEAKS ALL THE WAY!!!
The Jays will win out the season.
i am going to go eat mexican while drinking beer
picnic style.
on the white house lawn.
with Jesus. - Dozzer
You know Reimer? |
|
Aetherial
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Has anyone discussed the standings today? Joined: 06.30.2006
|
|
|
Does anyone else look at the Bruins roster and think they will be any good or will compete, their system has to be perfect for them to have any chance. - LeafMan
I can't see them being very good. I do think they'll exceed some people's expectations. most people have them completely written off. There is still a fair amount of talent there.
|
|
Aetherial
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Has anyone discussed the standings today? Joined: 06.30.2006
|
|
|
The Jays will win the World Series the same day the Leafs are eliminated from the playoffs. Oct 28th. - BingoLady
Well you know who else will be eliminated from the playoffs...
yeah, I got nothing.
|
|
|
|
The Jays will win the World Series the same day the Leafs are eliminated from the playoffs. Oct 28th. - BingoLady
I'm going to eat your avatar for lunch today!. |
|
markmark
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 07.27.2010
|
|
|
I'm going to eat your avatar for lunch today!. - zazzle
|
|
|
|
So... if LA needs to take Richards' contract back on (any news on a hearing?), I hope Leafs can make a deal which looks something like 2nd round pick for Richards + Toffoli.
Richards' contract is basically 'covered' by the Horton LTIR space.
Actually, one way out of the whole Richards problem for LA Kings would be to try and put Richards on LTIR (1st part) or 'injured non-roster' (2nd part):
[FROM CBA]:
The Injured Reserve List is a category of the Reserve List. A Club may place a
Player on the Injured Reserve List only if such Player is reasonably expected to be injured, ill or disabled and unable to perform his duties as a hockey Player for a minimum of seven (7) days from the onset of such injury, illness or disability. A Player who finishes an NHL Season on the Injured Reserve List and continues to be disabled and unable to perform his duties as a hockey Player by reason of the same injury at the time he reports to the Club's Training Camp in the next League Year, will again be eligible to be placed on the Club's Injured Reserve List. For any other Player who fails the Club's initial physical examination in any League Year, or is injured, ill or disabled while not on the Club's Active Roster, he shall not be eligible for, and may not be placed on, Injured Reserve, but instead shall be eligible to be, and may be designated as, Injured Non-Roster.
My guess is that a drug-addiction (if Richards indeed has one) qualifies as 'ill' and 'unable to perform his duties as a hockey player'.
Anybody knows how a player can be considered as 'not on the Club's Active Roster'? |
|
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme Joined: 01.20.2009
|
|
|
|
|
- markmark
stay away from the poop man as it has fentanyl in it! |
|
|
|
So... if LA needs to take Richards' contract back on (any news on a hearing?), I hope Leafs can make a deal which looks something like 2nd round pick for Richards + Toffoli.
Richards' contract is basically 'covered' by the Horton LTIR space.
Actually, one way out of the whole Richards problem for LA Kings would be to try and put Richards on LTIR (1st part) or 'injured non-roster' (2nd part):
- MaximusAurelius[FROM CBA]:
The Injured Reserve List is a category of the Reserve List. A Club may place a
Player on the Injured Reserve List only if such Player is reasonably expected to be injured, ill or disabled and unable to perform his duties as a hockey Player for a minimum of seven (7) days from the onset of such injury, illness or disability. A Player who finishes an NHL Season on the Injured Reserve List and continues to be disabled and unable to perform his duties as a hockey Player by reason of the same injury at the time he reports to the Club's Training Camp in the next League Year, will again be eligible to be placed on the Club's Injured Reserve List. For any other Player who fails the Club's initial physical examination in any League Year, or is injured, ill or disabled while not on the Club's Active Roster, he shall not be eligible for, and may not be placed on, Injured Reserve, but instead shall be eligible to be, and may be designated as, Injured Non-Roster.
My guess is that a drug-addiction (if Richards indeed has one) qualifies as 'ill' and 'unable to perform his duties as a hockey player'.
Anybody knows how a player can be considered as 'not on the Club's Active Roster'?
nah.
it will be a regular buy out or they'll settle on amount $$ and be done with it.
|
|