Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks: Trevor Linden Rejects Idea of Top-to-Bottom Rebuild
Author Message
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I’m a dose of reality in this cesspool of glee
Joined: 10.22.2011

Aug 15 @ 3:02 PM ET
Refusing to bottom out will be the undoing of this "rebuild"

Welcome to mediocrity

- TheGame316


It's the only thing most canuck fans know. Any suggested divergence from mediocrity is met with ridicule on these boards.

Most fans on here want to keep things just the way they always have been. Change is scary.
SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Escaped from Krypton
Joined: 07.29.2010

Aug 15 @ 3:31 PM ET
That 1st goal by linden was one of my favorite goals ever. What a performance by linden all night. We was king kong that night....best player on the planet for a game.
Linden will always be a hero in my heart from that night.
Broken nose, broken ribs, obviously in great pain and performs like that.....unreal.

How did we not win.....whole team was awesome that series.
Gullzy
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 02.07.2013

Aug 15 @ 3:32 PM ET
Your concern for this team is touching. Touching in the disturbing perverted way.
- A_SteamingLombardi


Hahahaha
CubanBuffet
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Whine Country
Joined: 08.29.2014

Aug 15 @ 3:33 PM ET
It's the only thing most canuck fans know. Any suggested divergence from mediocrity is met with ridicule on these boards.

Most fans on here want to keep things just the way they always have been. Change is scary.

- bloatedmosquito


I get the impression that most fans, on here at least, are in favour of a tear down.
Gullzy
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 02.07.2013

Aug 15 @ 3:45 PM ET
I get the impression that most fans, on here at least, are in favour of a tear down.
- CubanBuffet


I don't mind their experiment at all. Win now with an eye to the future. Some people say it's impossible, but I think that anything is possible once you get into the playoffs. At the very least our young guys will get some playoff experience.
vancity787
Vancouver Canucks
Location: My Parents Basement, BC
Joined: 07.14.2008

Aug 15 @ 3:58 PM ET
Our owner is a wussy.
- A_SteamingLombardi

This.
CubanBuffet
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Whine Country
Joined: 08.29.2014

Aug 15 @ 4:01 PM ET
I don't mind their experiment at all. Win now with an eye to the future. Some people say it's impossible, but I think that anything is possible once you get into the playoffs. At the very least our young guys will get some playoff experience.
- Gullzy


Me either. It's not like there's one sure fire route to a Cup.
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Aug 15 @ 4:01 PM ET
I get the impression that most fans, on here at least, are in favour of a tear down.
- CubanBuffet

I am personally available to drive anyone or everyone to the airport.
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Aug 15 @ 4:07 PM ET
Refusing to bottom out will be the undoing of this "rebuild"

Welcome to mediocrity

- TheGame316


This is such a fallacy it's not even funny. The only team, IMO, that's successfully tried to lose and it paid off for them is Pittsburgh (Mario Lemieux). And furthermore, they didn't get Crosby thru losing, they won a wide open frickin lottery that any team could have won. Other teams have been bad for a few seasons during transition years but they didn't "purposely" try to lose.

Chicago, as an example had two good picks, 3rd overall in Toews and the 5th overall pick where they were lucky enough to win the lottery. Los Angeles had ONE top three pick on their two Cup teams.

Teams like the Oilers and Buffalo and the NYI have great potential, but potential means nothing until it's realized...none of them have won jack sh!t.

Canucks have had five 1st rounds picks in the past three years, including a 6th & 9th overall and they're about to get some good picks in the next three from simply hitting the end of their competitive cycle.

They need to continue to draft well and the higher picks will come as I said, an obvious tank job is idiotic because a lot more teams have won without tanking than have.
CubanBuffet
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Whine Country
Joined: 08.29.2014

Aug 15 @ 4:17 PM ET
This is such a fallacy it's not even funny. The only team, IMO, that's successfully tried to lose and it paid off for them is Pittsburgh. And furthermore, they didn't get Crosby thru losing, they won a wide open frickin lottery that any team could have won. Other teams have been bad for a few seasons during transition years but they didn't "purposely" try to lose.

Chicago, as an example had two good picks, 3rd overall in Toews and the 5th overall pick where they were lucky enough to win the lottery. Los Angeles had ONE top three pick on their two Cup teams.

Teams like the Oilers and Buffalo and the NYI have great potential, but potential means nothing until it's realized...none of them have won jack sh!t.

Canucks have had five 1st rounds picks in the past three years, including a 6th & 9th overall and they're about to get some good picks in the next three from simply hitting the end of their competitive cycle.

They need to continue to draft well and the higher picks will come as I said, an obvious tank job is idiotic because a lot more teams have won without tanking than have.

- LeftCoaster


Preach on.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Aug 15 @ 4:21 PM ET
That wouldn't be too difficult considering how bad he played last season. Statistically speaking, wasn't he one of the worst players at his position in the entire league?
- bloatedmosquito


It could hardly get worse and if it does top 5 pick
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Aug 15 @ 4:24 PM ET
I get the impression that most fans, on here at least, are in favour of a tear down.
- CubanBuffet



I know I am.

The Sedins I fully expect to stay. Hamhuis should be gone later this year seeing his contract is up and I don't consider Vrbata core.

Higgins Burrows have one more year and Miller is not core.

If they can find a way to move Edler too then the tear down is complete
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Aug 15 @ 4:34 PM ET
This is such a fallacy it's not even funny. The only team, IMO, that's successfully tried to lose and it paid off for them is Pittsburgh. And furthermore, they didn't get Crosby thru losing, they won a wide open frickin lottery that any team could have won. Other teams have been bad for a few seasons during transition years but they didn't "purposely" try to lose.

Chicago, as an example had two good picks, 3rd overall in Toews and the 5th overall pick where they were lucky enough to win the lottery. Los Angeles had ONE top three pick on their two Cup teams.

Teams like the Oilers and Buffalo and the NYI have great potential, but potential means nothing until it's realized...none of them have won jack sh!t.

Canucks have had five 1st rounds picks in the past three years, including a 6th & 9th overall and they're about to get some good picks in the next three from simply hitting the end of their competitive cycle.

They need to continue to draft well and the higher picks will come as I said, an obvious tank job is idiotic because a lot more teams have won without tanking than have.

- LeftCoaster


Exactly. Tanking does not equal securing a generational talent or playoff success.
As I've said before, we used to comain about holding onto the core of this team for too long, now we have a decisive decision maker (who may not always get it right), but is at least making changes, keeping the team competitive and allowing space for a prospect or 2 to make the team each year.
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Aug 15 @ 4:34 PM ET
This is such a fallacy it's not even funny. The only team, IMO, that's successfully tried to lose and it paid off for them is Pittsburgh. And furthermore, they didn't get Crosby thru losing, they won a wide open frickin lottery that any team could have won. Other teams have been bad for a few seasons during transition years but they didn't "purposely" try to lose.

Chicago, as an example had two good picks, 3rd overall in Toews and the 5th overall pick where they were lucky enough to win the lottery. Los Angeles had ONE top three pick on their two Cup teams.

Teams like the Oilers and Buffalo and the NYI have great potential, but potential means nothing until it's realized...none of them have won jack sh!t.

Canucks have had five 1st rounds picks in the past three years, including a 6th & 9th overall and they're about to get some good picks in the next three from simply hitting the end of their competitive cycle.

They need to continue to draft well and the higher picks will come as I said, an obvious tank job is idiotic because a lot more teams have won without tanking than have.

- LeftCoaster


Exactly. Tanking does not equal securing a generational talent or playoff success.
As I've said before, we used to comain about holding onto the core of this team for too long, now we have a decisive decision maker (who may not always get it right), but is at least making changes, keeping the team competitive and allowing space for a prospect or 2 to make the team each year.
dbot
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Auckland -Burn it all down
Joined: 10.22.2008

Aug 15 @ 4:35 PM ET
dbl toilet post
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Aug 15 @ 4:37 PM ET
I know I am.

The Sedins I fully expect to stay. Hamhuis should be gone later this year seeing his contract is up and I don't consider Vrbata core.

Higgins Burrows have one more year and Miller is not core.

If they can find a way to move Edler too then the tear down is complete

- VANTEL

As I said above, the team is going to get bad for a few years thru natural attrition of the older players, that's when they'll get a few top five picks. Which are needed to compete for a Stanley Cup.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Aug 15 @ 4:44 PM ET
As I said above, the team is going to get bad for a few years thru natural attrition of the older players, that's when they'll get a few top five picks. Which are needed to compete for a Stanley Cup.
- LeftCoaster


One of my favourite players for years has been Burrows, but everything has an expiration date. I hope one day they give him a job with the team , but as a player here his time is coming to an end. Thanks for the years of service.

I know sometimes I use the word tank and talk about top 5. I think it is incorrect how I state it. I want change and upgrade. I don't mind losing to get the players needed to win. I don't want a team of passive , safe players. I want bite ( not a Burrows pun) , energy , and skill. This current roster can not provide that. So I want change.
LeftCoaster
Location: Valley Of The Sun
Joined: 07.03.2009

Aug 15 @ 4:47 PM ET
One of my favourite players for years has been Burrows, but everything has an expiration date. I hope one day they give him a job with the team , but as a player here his time is coming to an end. Thanks for the years of service.

I know sometimes I use the word tank and talk about top 5. I think it is incorrect how I state it. I want change and upgrade. I don't mind losing to get the players needed to win. I don't want a team of passive , safe players. I want bite ( not a Burrows pun) , energy , and skill. This current roster can not provide that. So I want change.

- VANTEL

I want it too...in the worst way. It'll come, but it needs to be done over time, it's already started.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Aug 15 @ 4:49 PM ET
I want it too...in the worst way. It'll come, but it needs to be done over time, it's already started.
- LeftCoaster

I realize that now. Like I said 4 or 5 more players to be moved then it's done.

Sedins are going nowhere.they will be the anchor as the team changes personnel
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Aug 15 @ 4:58 PM ET
Thanks! Hey, Pittsburgh's here!
- CubanBuffet


The poster child for underachievement!
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Aug 15 @ 5:00 PM ET
That 1st goal by linden was one of my favorite goals ever. What a performance by linden all night. We was king kong that night....best player on the planet for a game.
Linden will always be a hero in my heart from that night.
Broken nose, broken ribs, obviously in great pain and performs like that.....unreal.

How did we not win.....whole team was awesome that series.

- SMBDragon


SMBDragon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Escaped from Krypton
Joined: 07.29.2010

Aug 15 @ 5:15 PM ET

- 1970vintage


Is that lafayette?

Ya that was a half an inch away from in.
Gelina also wide open net, ronning, linden, hedican, bure put it across goal line twice..... the hockey gods were just not tipping their hat that night.

Vancouver has wanted linden at the helm since his retirement..... and that night is what secured the team presidency
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Aug 15 @ 5:46 PM ET
Where are the Jay fans today?
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Aug 15 @ 6:39 PM ET
Where are the Jay fans today?
- VANTEL

lol...receeding as reality sets in...

Marwood
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Aug 15 @ 6:40 PM ET
Where are the Jay fans today?
- VANTEL

Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next