phyllee
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 06.24.2014
|
|
|
Sbisa for Luke schenn, ,basically same dollar and schenns contract is shorter.
I think bennings worst mistake is trading kassian and a fifth for prust. Woulda prefured draft picks.
|
|
|
|
He's only trade-able for another bad contract in return. People who refuse to believe that don't realize how bad he is and the many better options other teams have to use that 3.6M on instead of him.
He and Miller will be pretty damn hard to trade. - Nucker101
I still wonder what San Jose was willing to offer for Miller? (according to Friedman)
Vancouver is brutal place for a goalie to play in and Lack was one of the few that could handle it.
|
|
|
|
He's only trade-able for another bad contract in return. People who refuse to believe that don't realize how bad he is and the many better options other teams have to use that 3.6M on instead of him.
He and Miller will be pretty damn hard to trade. - Nucker101
Why trade Miller? He has one year left after this season. Its nothing toward the future of this club. Markstrom will get playing time. Miller will be solid. Throwing Miller in the same ilk as Sbisa is ridiculous. |
|
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Las Vegas Joined: 08.05.2014
|
|
|
Says the guy with Canuck blinders on. - Nucker101
No...I'm just level headed and don't panic over bs like moving down from pic 28 - 34 or a 2 year vs 3 contract. I have more important things to stress over. Patient |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I still wonder what San Jose was willing to offer for Miller? (according to Friedman)
Vancouver is brutal place for a goalie to play in and Lack was one of the few that could handle it. - classic321
Jones is better than Miller. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Sbisa for Luke schenn, ,basically same dollar and schenns contract is shorter.
I think bennings worst mistake is trading kassian and a fifth for prust. Woulda prefured draft picks. - phyllee
Yeah, I get why he dwelt him but to give away a later pick and get an older/more expensive player on top of it.
Prust looks slow as hell these days. |
|
|
|
I still wonder what San Jose was willing to offer for Miller? (according to Friedman)
Vancouver is brutal place for a goalie to play in and Lack was one of the few that could handle it. - classic321
Miller handles it just fine. He's a professional. We are hard on our goalies yes but its the NHL you have to be ready for the limelight in any of the Canadian cities. |
|
|
|
Jones is better than Miller. - Nucker101
No. |
|
|
|
Sbisa for Luke schenn, ,basically same dollar and schenns contract is shorter.
I think bennings worst mistake is trading kassian and a fifth for prust. Woulda prefured draft picks. - phyllee
I will never understand why Benning has to add picks into deals. Otherwise I don't hate the trades.
-- We should have been receiving the 5th round pick in that deal for Kassian, not giving it away
-- Not sure why we had to include a 3rd in the Kesler trade
-- Giving a 2nd in the Sutter trade was very very odd.
|
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Why trade Miller? He has one year left after this season. Its nothing toward the future of this club. Markstrom will get playing time. Miller will be solid. Throwing Miller in the same ilk as Sbisa is ridiculous. - thundachunk
I didn't say we had to trade him, but some here have suggested that he can/will be moved for a draft pick. Maybe during his final year if the Canucks retain 50% at the TDL, but other than that I don't see it.
Hopefully one of Markstrom or Demko is the real deal for the future. |
|
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Nanaimo Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
The Garrison trade was a great move
They traded Bieksa
Vey is not looking good, but he was worth the gamble
If they trade Sbisa, or if he improves, the deal will be good
Dorsett might make too much money, but that is basically said about every player when they sign
Sbisa was more on Desjardins than Benning. I don't think that anything that came back in the Kesler trade should be used to judge Benning as a talent evaluator, apart from what he did with the pick (which is looking pretty good right now). - KB3Point0
I can understand how some people think that trading Garrison was necessary but I have no idea how you can call it a great move. Ignoring what he did with the 2nd round pick, he got bad value for a very effective player and still ended including a draft pick in the deal.
Unless you think Desjardin was the one who targeted Sbisa a as a "top 4 D" then that has to be on Benning as well, the decision to resign him before playoffs and after a brutal season is likely on the whole mgmt group but Benning ultimately is the one who is responsible.
Benning also called Bonino a fundamental piece, top 6 C etc. and said he was key to the Kesler trade.... If Bonino didn't work out here and expected him to be a part of this team long term then that is an example of his player evaluation.
I'm fully on board with giving Benning time for his moves to show their true colors but suggesting that the players he has brought in, signed, resigned are not fair to judge him on is strange.... what else would you judge him on? |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
No...I'm just level headed and don't panic over bs like moving down from pic 28 - 34 or a 2 year vs 3 contract. I have more important things to stress over. Patient - CanuckDon
Sutter is a long term move, and even short-term moves can play a role in the long-term since it limits flexibility.
Who cares, we all know what side of the fence we stand on. Let's discuss the opening night lineup. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
No. - thundachunk
You'll see. |
|
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Nanaimo Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
I still wonder what San Jose was willing to offer for Miller? (according to Friedman)
Vancouver is brutal place for a goalie to play in and Lack was one of the few that could handle it. - classic321
I think we would of had to take a bad contract back or retain salary.
Some thought that Marleau - Miller was the proposed trade but I doubt those two are of equal value. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I will never understand why Benning has to add picks into deals. Otherwise I don't hate the trades.
-- We should have been receiving the 5th round pick in that deal for Kassian, not giving it away
-- Not sure why we had to include a 3rd in the Kesler trade
-- Giving a 2nd in the Sutter trade was very very odd. - classic321
What people fail to understand is that even these minor things can make a big difference. You need every little advantage you can get in this league, but Benning has shown less concern with the minor details like overpaying in trades/contracts to get them done quicker. It'll come back to bite him unless Aquilini is cool with missing the playoffs the next 3 years. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I think we would of had to take a bad contract back or retain salary.
Some thought that Marleau - Miller was the proposed trade but I doubt those two are of equal value. - belcherbd
Either way, it's now definitely off the table. |
|
|
|
I didn't say we had to trade him, but some here have suggested that he can/will be moved for a draft pick. Maybe during his final year if the Canucks retain 50% at the TDL, but other than that I don't see it.
Hopefully one of Markstrom or Demko is the real deal for the future. - Nucker101
I truly believe Markstrom will be a good starting goalie in the league.
Lack I could never get on board with as a starter. He may yet prove me wrong and I wish him the best but JB's intentions to keep him and move Lack was the right one regardless of Miller here or not.
|
|
|
|
You'll see. - Nucker101
I seem to remember I was one of the few that said we would make the playoffs last season and you have been on full tank mode since Pre-Torts era. So we will see. I thought he looked great last night and so did Jones. Its still only the pre season. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I truly believe Markstrom will be a good starting goalie in the league.
Lack I could never get on board with as a starter. He may yet prove me wrong and I wish him the best but JB's intentions to keep him and move Lack was the right one regardless of Miller here or not. - thundachunk
I was actually not too pissed about Lack either. But I do think he has the potential to be a top 20 starter. He's definitely not Schneider 2.0.
Miller signing still doesn't make sense to me. Even if they wanted a vet starter, he could have signed him to a 2 year deal or less $$ if he wanted 3 years which would have made him more valuable in the trade market if Benning wanted to explore that option in the future depending on the two Swedes development. |
|
|
|
What people fail to understand is that even these minor things can make a big difference. You need every little advantage you can get in this league, but Benning has shown less concern with the minor details like overpaying in trades/contracts to get them done quicker. It'll come back to bite him unless Aquilini is cool with missing the playoffs the next 3 years. - Nucker101
I think with this line up we can make the playoffs. |
|
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver Joined: 06.14.2012
|
|
|
He's only trade-able for another bad contract in return. People who refuse to believe that don't realize how bad he is and the many better options other teams have to use that 3.6M on instead of him.
He and Miller will be pretty damn hard to trade. - Nucker101
Both are trade-able at the right point of the year and you won't have to take a bad contract in return. Might not get much value in return, but moveable. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I seem to remember I was one of the few that said we would make the playoffs last season and you have been on full tank mode since Pre-Torts era. So we will see. I thought he looked great last night and so did Jones. Its still only the pre season. - thundachunk
Umm wanting a tank and predicting one are two very different things. Last year, I said countless times that I predict a bounce back season. Had them in the 7-10 range in the West, they ended up winning more 1 goal games and OT/SO games than I thought(which can vary year to year in this league) and finished higher but in the playoffs they did end up looking like a 7-10 place team. |
|
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver Joined: 06.14.2012
|
|
|
Sbisa for Luke schenn, ,basically same dollar and schenns contract is shorter.
I think bennings worst mistake is trading kassian and a fifth for prust. Woulda prefured draft picks. - phyllee
NOBODY WANTED KASSIAN. NOBODY WAS GIVING UP DRAFT PICKS FOR HIM. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
I think with this line up we can make the playoffs. - thundachunk
I want to see the opening night lineup before I make a true prediction. |
|
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver Joined: 06.14.2012
|
|
|
I still wonder what San Jose was willing to offer for Miller? (according to Friedman)
Vancouver is brutal place for a goalie to play in and Lack was one of the few that could handle it. - classic321
Lack was a backup. He didn't have to handle Canucks fans turning on him. |
|