Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
he's had a rough stretch (so has the entire leafs team) but he's still been good this year.
top 10 in the league is ridiculous......but he's been very good. - sensarmy_11
Check out the difference of QOC and dzone starts between him and Rielly...You'll understand why he looks a little better than he actually is. |
|
DoubleDown
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Not to point any fingers but Tyson Barrie has looked awful in the blue and white for the Leafs., QC Joined: 07.28.2006
|
|
|
i have never in my life seen a set of standards as low as those in Toronto for the Leafs |
|
|
|
Karlsson's skating ability is such an asset when he defends. Even if he does get beat 1 on 1, which is rare, he often recovers due to his speed. - rangerdanger94
early in his career his defense was pretty bad.....but he's learned what his skills are (skating, positioning, stick work) and built his game around that.
he's obviously not a shut down guy, but he's certainly much better than average in his own zone.....i'd even say he's very good at this point......when matched with his offensive ability (which is undeniably the best in the league) easily makes for one of the 2-3 best overall d-men in the league. |
|
|
|
Check out the difference of QOC and dzone starts between him and Rielly...You'll understand why he looks a little better than he actually is. - Garnie
oh, don't get me wrong....i think rielly is a much better d-man. just saying that gardiner has been better this year. he's been pretty awful the last couple years, so it's been a nice rebound season. he's turned into a legit top 4 guy.....and obviously i mean a top 4 pairing guy, not top 4 in the league....cough tanner is crazy cough cough |
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
early in his career his defense was pretty bad.....but he's learned what his skills are (skating, positioning, stick work) and built his game around that.
he's obviously not a shut down guy, but he's certainly much better than average in his own zone.....i'd even say he's very good at this point......when matched with his offensive ability (which is undeniably the best in the league) easily makes for one of the 2-3 best overall d-men in the league. - sensarmy_11
Meh, not everyone agrees....but he's certainly gifted offensively.
|
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
oh, don't get me wrong....i think rielly is a much better d-man. just saying that gardiner has been better this year. he's been pretty awful the last couple years, so it's been a nice rebound season. he's turned into a legit top 4 guy.....and obviously i mean a top 4 pairing guy, not top 4 in the league....cough tanner is crazy cough cough - sensarmy_11
Better usage and a better p than he's had in the past IMO |
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
What? You're a lunatic.
You know players ( especially goalies ) have peaks and valleys. Reimer couldn't hold Rinne's jock most years...he has has 1/2 season of being poor and now James " I got no glove hand" Reimer is an upgrade. - Garnie
Rinne has a career sv% of .918 compared to Reimer's .915... given the defense in front of him he should be killing it but he isn't. At $7m per you expect more out of your goalie. And at 33, he's not going to get much improved from here... |
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: ON Joined: 11.30.2009
|
|
|
Rinne has a career sv% of .918 compared to Reimer's .915... given the defense in front of him he should be killing it but he isn't. At $7m per you expect more out of your goalie. And at 33, he's not going to get much improved from here... - lumlums
Meh, Rinne's>Reimer...Reimer has had a great start to this year...not his norm....Rinne has had a terrible start to this year...not the norm.
I'd take a 33 yr old Rinne over Reim's any day.
IMO
|
|
annoyed
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: ON Joined: 10.28.2013
|
|
|
The fact that you think Gardiner has been better than Rielly this year explains why you feel Karlsson is better than average in his own zone. It's all clear now, you're a retard.
Thanks. - djamon
I think he meant Gards has been better this year then he was last year.
He doesn't think Gards is better than Rielly
|
|
|
|
Check out the difference of QOC and dzone starts between him and Rielly...You'll understand why he looks a little better than he actually is. - Garnie
But..but... Tanner says zone starts don't matter!
I'm surprised he hasn't yet claimed that of course, Gardiner and Kadri face a lower QOC than other Leafs, because Gardiner and Kadri are always the best players on the ice no matter what and therefore it's impossible for them to face a higher QOC than themselves. |
|
|
|
The fact that you think Gardiner has been better than Rielly this year explains why you feel Karlsson is better than average in his own zone. It's all clear now, you're a retard.
Thanks. - djamon
you english no read good |
|
djamon
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Victoria, BC Joined: 05.27.2013
|
|
|
I think he meant Gards has been better this year then he was last year.
He doesn't think Gards is better than Rielly - annoyed
Someone compared the zone starts of Rielly and Gardiner, and the guy said Gardiner had been better this year. If he meant what you said he needs to learn how to write, if he meant what I said then he's a dumbass.
|
|
|
|
The fact that you think Gardiner has been better than Rielly this year explains why you feel Karlsson is better than average in his own zone. It's all clear now, you're a retard.
Thanks. - djamon
Gardiner is way better than Rielly.Significantly. Hes also way older, but there's no guarantee Rielly is ever as good as Gardiner is today. |
|
|
|
But..but... Tanner says zone starts don't matter!
I'm surprised he hasn't yet claimed that of course, Gardiner and Kadri face a lower QOC than other Leafs, because Gardiner and Kadri are always the best players on the ice no matter what and therefore it's impossible for them to face a higher QOC than themselves. - TheMaritimer
The long term effects of better zone starts and qoc have virtually no effect. Not my opinion, proven fact. Might as well say global warming is fake. |
|
annoyed
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: ON Joined: 10.28.2013
|
|
|
But..but... Tanner says zone starts don't matter!
I'm surprised he hasn't yet claimed that of course, Gardiner and Kadri face a lower QOC than other Leafs, because Gardiner and Kadri are always the best players on the ice no matter what and therefore it's impossible for them to face a higher QOC than themselves. - TheMaritimer
Tanner could be right about QOC, over a whole career or 2 careers or some magic #. But when I look at Rielly's QOC and piles of more Dzone starts its not hard to figure out that my eyes are not lying Rielly>Gardiner ( this year ) If you had a clue about hockey you can see Rielly is headband shoulders better than Gardiner. |
|
Pres.cup
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Making the most of the worst situation... Canuck fan 4life , BC Joined: 12.23.2014
|
|
|
I think he meant Gards has been better this year then he was last year.
He doesn't think Gards is better than Rielly - annoyed
He did call Gardiner a top 10 defenceman.
If he doesn't think that he is better then Reilly then he thinks that both of them at top 10.
I mean, I really like Rielly but that would be a stretch, having two top 10 players on your team at one time is unreal. |
|
annoyed
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: ON Joined: 10.28.2013
|
|
|
Gardiner is way better than Rielly.Significantly. Hes also way older, but there's no guarantee Rielly is ever as good as Gardiner is today. - James_Tanner
No, not even close. The guy who whispers these things to you is wrong. |
|
Pres.cup
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Making the most of the worst situation... Canuck fan 4life , BC Joined: 12.23.2014
|
|
|
Gardiner is way better than Rielly.Significantly. Hes also way older, but there's no guarantee Rielly is ever as good as Gardiner is today. - James_Tanner
I do agree with this.
Rielly should be better then Gardiner at some point in the future, he had a much higher ceiling. Right now Rielly is still learning the things that took Gardiner some time to learn.
The gap is not very big. |
|
annoyed
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: ON Joined: 10.28.2013
|
|
|
The long term effects of better zone starts and qoc have virtually no effect. Not my opinion, proven fact. Might as well say global warming is fake. - James_Tanner
Long term, we're talking about this year and the QOC and zone starts have a great impact. |
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
Tanner could be right about QOC, over a whole career or 2 careers or some magic #. But when I look at Rielly's QOC and piles of more Dzone starts its not hard to figure out that my eyes are not lying Rielly>Gardiner ( this year ) If you had a clue about hockey you can see Rielly is headband shoulders better than Gardiner. - annoyed
"headband shoulders"???
#UsingIt |
|
|
|
Tanner Logic:
Gardiner>Weber
Reimer>Rinne
Leafs - 38 points
Preds - 48 points
|
|
annoyed
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: ON Joined: 10.28.2013
|
|
|
"headband shoulders"???
#UsingIt - lumlums
(frank)ing fat fingers on my phone |
|
lumlums
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
(frank)ing fat fingers on my phone - annoyed
|
|
djamon
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Victoria, BC Joined: 05.27.2013
|
|
|
Gardiner is way better than Rielly.Significantly. Hes also way older, but there's no guarantee Rielly is ever as good as Gardiner is today. - James_Tanner
Oh boy. |
|