Shink was weak and doesnt attempt physical play. Glanlund from what Ive been told by a few different people is hes more physical. Not like hes a threatening figure just that hes still physical, which apparently shink would never become. Shink was smaller as well. Pretty sure we came out on top.
- SMBDragon
Time will tell, I guess as long as he is a marginal improvement or helps the club, all good.
The hardest part about being a fan is the more you get into it, the more there is to get into. You like the Canucks so you start looking at the Comets and wonder what this or that player could do if given the opportunity. Then on the other side of that you have a GM that is making moves, that fecker didn't consult me, but has more info, indepth stuff that he bases his decisions on.