The fact that you are obsessing over an article written by a member of the Toronto media is just sad. If someone in Buffalo wrote an article about the Leafs' current tank job, no one in Toronto would care
But you guys are getting all worked up about this. Textbook inferiority complex - AxlRose91
As well as some in the Toronto media referring to the Leafs current tank job as "Tanking with integrity"
The fact that you are obsessing over an article written by a member of the Toronto media is just sad. If someone in Buffalo wrote an article about the Leafs' current tank job, no one in Toronto would care
But you guys are getting all worked up about this. Textbook inferiority complex - AxlRose91
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita Joined: 07.14.2011
Feb 23 @ 11:38 AM ET
did you watch hockey last season when half the media ripped buffalo for their tank job? - homiedclown
I don't listen to the Toronto sports media, no. As has been pointed out numerous times here, they are absolutely terrible. You shouldn't take any notice of what they say. They are willing to call a player's mother to inquire about her son's injury. Not worth the time to listen or read their opinions
I don't listen to the Toronto sports media, no. As has been pointed out numerous times here, they are absolutely terrible. You shouldn't take any notice of what they say. They are willing to call a player's mother to inquire about her son's injury. Not worth the time to listen or read their opinions - walshyleafsfan
Anyone who listens to the Toronto media deserves to be this worked up regarding the Leafs.
The Leafs are irrelevant, have been for 50 odd years, they shouldn't be getting blogs on Hockeybuzz. I'm perplexed as to why a Buffalo blogger wasted time writing about the Leafs. - walshyleafsfan
Slow down there 50 years of irrelevancy. Leafs were a legit contender in the early 90's - maybe even a favorite if you consider a favorite to be one of the top 5 teams in the league.
In the mid/late 90's the Leafs had another decent run. I wouldn't consider them top 5 in the league like in the Gilmour days, but the Sundin/Mogilny days were legit.
The truth is that the Leafs had a strategy before the salary cap era. They always traded youth and picks for vets. And they always signed vets as UFA. They ALWAYS(almost) made the playoffs and they had a few stints in the 90's where they were a top team.
When the salary cap and ELC(rookie contracts) came in - the Leafs were left bare with no real prospects, no high picks and no elite young players. It's been 10 years but we are now recovering from the pain of our own strategy - that used to work.
Location: I really don't care about Nylander, I really hope he gets injured and is out - Makita Joined: 07.14.2011
Feb 23 @ 11:43 AM ET
Slow down there 50 years of irrelevancy. Leafs were a legit contender in the early 90's - maybe even a favorite if you consider a favorite to be one of the top 5 teams in the league.
In the mid/late 90's the Leafs had another decent run. I wouldn't consider them top 5 in the league like in the Gilmour days, but the Sundin/Mogilny days were legit.
The truth is that the Leafs had a strategy before the salary cap era. They always traded youth and picks for vets. And they always signed vets as UFA. They ALWAYS(almost) made the playoffs and they had a few stints in the 90's where they were a top team.
When the salary cap and ELC(rookie contracts) came in - the Leafs were left bare with no real prospects, no high picks and no elite young players. It's been 10 years but we are now recovering from the pain of our own strategy - that used to work. - Allan Bester
Location: "___________ stinks."-Sabres89, NY Joined: 07.26.2008
Feb 23 @ 11:43 AM ET
Slow down there 50 years of irrelevancy. Leafs were a legit contender in the early 90's - maybe even a favorite if you consider a favorite to be one of the top 5 teams in the league.
In the mid/late 90's the Leafs had another decent run. I wouldn't consider them top 5 in the league like in the Gilmour days, but the Sundin/Mogilny days were legit.
The truth is that the Leafs had a strategy before the salary cap era. They always traded youth and picks for vets. And they always signed vets as UFA. They ALWAYS(almost) made the playoffs and they had a few stints in the 90's where they were a top team.
When the salary cap and ELC(rookie contracts) came in - the Leafs were left bare with no real prospects, no high picks and no elite young players. It's been 10 years but we are now recovering from the pain of our own strategy - that used to work. - Allan Bester
It did? The only thing that really matters at the end of the day are Stanley Cups. Of which you haven't won since before the Sabres came into the league.
I know, I know. The Sabres don't have any either. But I'm also not sitting here saying that our strategy over the past 2 decades used to "work" either.
Location: Turning a new Leaf, CA Joined: 09.29.2010
Feb 23 @ 11:44 AM ET
Johnston calls Toronto's moves "smart and savvy" in regards to their trade deadline approach but even more impressive is how they managed to hoodwink hockey north with a PR campaign that has the full backing of the national media in Canada.
Toronto based media all deserve to be beaten into metaphorical submission...
Location: “Give me Point, Cirelli and Paul all day against anybody.” Mr. Cooper , ON Joined: 07.06.2007
Feb 23 @ 11:45 AM ET
There's no clear, obvious line between tanking and rebuilding. IMO, it's more a question of emphasis. Trades designed primarily to make the team less competitive in the short term to secure a better draft pick seems more like tanking.
Trades designed primarily to acquire picks, prospects or cap space to be used to improve the team over the longer term seems more like rebuilding. Obviously these kind of trades tend to do both so it's a judgement call.
The Leafs have been very focussed on draft and development and the hiring of Mark Hunter reflects the value they put on drafting. The lottery system doesn't guarantee anything and there's no McDavid in this year's draft so the value of finishing last is not that significant.
Location: I Know Nothink ... NOTHINK! Joined: 07.27.2007
Feb 23 @ 11:48 AM ET
There's no clear, obvious line between tanking and rebuilding. IMO, it's more a question of emphasis. Trades designed primarily to make the team less competitive in the short term to secure a better draft pick seems more like tanking.
Trades designed primarily to acquire picks, prospects or cap space to be used to improve the team over the longer term seems more like rebuilding. Obviously these kind of trades tend to do both so it's a judgement call.
The Leafs have been very focussed on draft and development and the hiring of Mark Hunter reflects the value they put on drafting. The lottery system doesn't guarantee anything and there's no McDavid in this year's draft so the value of finishing last is not that significant. - Canada Cup