How about Hammy and Hansen for goligoski

but Vatenen is a Gemini, so he must be worth twice what Hansen is...
- hillbillydeluxe

Hansen, prospect and 2017 4th

Hey EK had credibility until he showed his face.
- A_SteamingLombardi

The mystery and magic is gone E4

How about Hammy and Hansen for goligoski
- The_Kuze

Goligoski is a pending ufa...

Did Hamhuis really submit a three-team list and Chicago wasn't on it?

Did Hamhuis really submit a three-team list and Chicago wasn't on it?
- TommyHawk

You should have referred to your magic 8 ball before asking us... all speculation

I don't follow. You think Hamhuis will be going to ANA, or you think Fowler is coming to VAN and Theo will replace him in ANA?
- Codes1087

Theo makes Fowler un-needed. I would imagine they would love to get rid of his salary. hammer+ for Fowler makes sense

Theo makes Fowler un-needed. I would imagine they would love to get rid of his salary. hammer+ for Fowler makes sense
- Retinalz

For everyone but Anaheim.....

Sorry, saw him in one of the conversations threads on twitter, I find he has as much credibility as Botch or Sekeres.
- hillbillydeluxe

Haha he probably does...I think he is Botchs main source and vise versa. The guy is such a negative scum bag and pretends he is an insider. He doesn't know jack

Not saying its a fair trade but man, you have to move beyond the back of a hockey card.....

Vatanen is a smallish one-dimensional player while Hansen is grit, Penalty killing, some scoring etc.....

Its not too far off...
- chompsey

I'm with u n agree its near the ballpark n not delusional n can be a part of a big deal.

Spitballing time 😂😂👍🏻

Hamhuis/Hansen for Vatanen/2nd

Or Hansen/Brisebois for Vatanen/4th

Main point is Anaheim is a budget team n Vatanen due a raise:
Hamhuis along with Theodore steps into the lineup.
Big change n very solid.
Hansen cost certainty at a great price is the linch pin.
Brisebois a prospect n a 4th gives total control n cost certainty.
This last example makes tons of sense to the Ducks now n the future IMO

Did Hamhuis really submit a three-team list and Chicago wasn't on it?
- TommyHawk

You really didn't believe this did you?

"VAN deal will be Hamhuis and Baertschi for Bickell and Svedberg. Sekac waived and claimed covers Baertschi's salary"

Did Hamhuis really submit a three-team list and Chicago wasn't on it?
- TommyHawk

I posted that earlier here n said it was a rumour.

I'm with u n agree its near the ballpark n not delusional n can be a part of a big deal.

Spitballing time 😂😂👍🏻

Hamhuis/Hansen for Vatanen/2nd

Or Hansen/Brisebois for Vatanen/4th

Main point is Anaheim is a budget team n Vatanen due a raise:
Hamhuis along with Theodore steps into the lineup.
Big change n very solid.
Hansen cost certainty at a great price is the linch pin.
Brisebois a prospect n a 4th gives total control n cost certainty.
This last example makes tons of sense to the Ducks now n the future IMO
- Nighthawk

I doubt we trade for Vatanen, would make the trade for that other RHD pointless.

Haha he probably does...I think he is Botchs main source and vise versa. The guy is such a negative scum bag and pretends he is an insider. He doesn't know jack
- CanuckDon

He'd fit in perfect here.

Theo makes Fowler un-needed. I would imagine they would love to get rid of his salary. hammer+ for Fowler makes sense
- Retinalz

Why would ANA get rid of a former first round pick for hamhuis (rental) when Fowler is more than capable.

He'd fit in perfect here.
- A_SteamingLombardi

Booner would send him packing.

Booner would send him packing.
- hillbillydeluxe

Hell yeah, that would be fun.

You really didn't believe this did you?

"VAN deal will be Hamhuis and Baertschi for Bickell and Svedberg. Sekac waived and claimed covers Baertschi's salary"
- A_SteamingLombardi

oh man this would be a terrible trade.

oh man this would be a terrible trade.
- Crazybagoham

That is the famed, Chicago package sans bag of pucks...

Why would ANA get rid of a former first round pick for hamhuis (rental) when Fowler is more than capable.
- Codes1087

Hence Hammer + hammer to replace for this year and a + to make it worth their while.

That is the famed, Chicago package sans bag of pucks...
- hillbillydeluxe

made me cringe haha, Glad they picked up Ladd so we werent left with their garbage.

https://twitter.com/TheFl...status/703338508132474880





I am not sure where that quote came from about taking it easy on Hamhuis, guess it was Spector.

Did Hamhuis really submit a three-team list and Chicago wasn't on it?
- TommyHawk

He is a true Canuck , he hates the Hawks

https://twitter.com/TheFlopFish/status/703338508132474880



- hillbillydeluxe

Sportsnet/media in general is chalked full of idiots yet they feed the fire that is the fans on many occasions.

I doubt we trade for Vatanen, would make the trade for that other RHD pointless.
- Retinalz

Larsen is no guarantee of a lock &/or a stumblng block for the Canucks.
I expect Weber n Barts gone. Depth will still be needed taken care of.
The very real chance Hamhuis returns offers up more options.
It would keep us in a retool mode to keep inline with JB's plan.
I'll go further saying we resign Hammer for maybe 3m/3yrs.
Vatanen I'm thinking 4.5-4.8m/5yrs.
Just my musings