Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks: Hawks Make Moves, Dan Hamhuis Apparently Still in Play
Author Message
MaWLz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Langley , BC
Joined: 01.05.2009

Feb 27 @ 9:00 PM ET
It doesn't matter who we pick some here will overvalue him.
- A_SteamingLombardi

Lol well of course
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 27 @ 9:01 PM ET
Come on JB

Hansen and Bart for Theodore
Hammer and Vrbata for VN and Johns(assuming he's as good as he's said to be)
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.21.2009

Feb 27 @ 9:02 PM ET
It doesn't matter who we pick some here will overvalue him.
- A_SteamingLombardi

And the rest of HB undervalue him
Brooks_Light
Joined: 08.13.2015

Feb 27 @ 9:05 PM ET
Who makes the team in a matter of who is picking it.
After the way they played, it's fair to say a better team could have been assembled, no?

- Bieksa#3

true - I guess I just mean since the team was picked and he didn't make it I'm surprised that he's still the top dman expected to be picked. Usually in the past, future stud dman consistently are huge factors in that tourney - that being said - I wouldn't mind if we get Sergachev or Juolevi either
storm88
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Surrey, BC
Joined: 09.29.2011

Feb 27 @ 9:06 PM ET
If they stay where they are in standings and after lottery I would assume a guy like Sergachev or Bean would be the dman they draft. If they move up up to the big boys they probably take a F. Then D the next few picks.

But
Brooks_Light
Joined: 08.13.2015

Feb 27 @ 9:09 PM ET
I'm not sold on him either.. I don't take him in the top 5 personally.. If we somehow get another 1st take a D man there and go heavy D the rest of the way
- MaWLz


If we somehow get a top four I think we gotta take one of the Finns or Tkachuk right?
Brooks_Light
Joined: 08.13.2015

Feb 27 @ 9:14 PM ET
If they stay where they are in standings and after lottery I would assume a guy like Sergachev or Bean would be the dman they draft. If they move up up to the big boys they probably take a F. Then D the next few picks.

But

- storm88


Yeah man - the only difference is I take Juolevi over Bean cus of the slight size advantage and I think there's something special about the water them finny boys have been drinking
storm88
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Surrey, BC
Joined: 09.29.2011

Feb 27 @ 9:16 PM ET
If we somehow get a top four I think we gotta take one of the Finns or Tkachuk right?
- Brooks_Light


For sure. Finns all the way. Laine, Puljujarvi or Juolevi (D) too
storm88
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Surrey, BC
Joined: 09.29.2011

Feb 27 @ 9:18 PM ET
Yeah man - the only difference is I take Juolevi over Bean cus of the slight size advantage and I think there's something special about the water them finny boys have been drinking
- Brooks_Light


I was assuming Juolevi doesn't last til 8ish. But ya agreed.
Marwood
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Cumberland, BC
Joined: 03.18.2010

Feb 27 @ 9:20 PM ET
You at least provided me with the link.
- CubanBuffet

He felt sorry for you.
Brooks_Light
Joined: 08.13.2015

Feb 27 @ 9:27 PM ET
I was assuming Juolevi doesn't last til 8ish. But ya agreed.
- storm88


Dude I've seen him projected at 13th!!!!! That's insane - Bean and Fabbro are ahead of him!!
MaWLz
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Langley , BC
Joined: 01.05.2009

Feb 27 @ 9:31 PM ET
If we somehow get a top four I think we gotta take one of the Finns or Tkachuk right?
- Brooks_Light

I think without a doubt personally... BPA top 5..if theres a D man of equal value there then ya but I think those 4 are above
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 27 @ 9:33 PM ET
Dude I've seen him projected at 13th!!!!! That's insane - Bean and Fabbro are ahead of him!!
- Brooks_Light

Bean is a waste of a first round pick
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Feb 27 @ 9:35 PM ET
Bean is a waste of a first round pick
- VANTEL


Haven't seen him much...either way, BPA always
Brooks_Light
Joined: 08.13.2015

Feb 27 @ 9:37 PM ET
Bean is a waste of a first round pick
- VANTEL



Why is that?
A_SteamingLombardi
Location: Systemic failure / Slurptastic
Joined: 10.12.2008

Feb 27 @ 9:46 PM ET
Why is that?
- Brooks_Light

Cause Lefty told him
storm88
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Surrey, BC
Joined: 09.29.2011

Feb 27 @ 9:47 PM ET
Cue the Mr. Bean gif.
CanuckDon
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Las Vegas
Joined: 08.05.2014

Feb 27 @ 9:50 PM ET
Cause Lefty told him
- A_SteamingLombardi


That's all I needed to hear. (frank) Bean
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 27 @ 9:50 PM ET
Why is that?
- Brooks_Light

Mostly it will take him 5 years to be NHL ready
Scooby_Doo
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Somewhere close to Vancouver., BC
Joined: 06.10.2009

Feb 27 @ 9:59 PM ET
Dude I've seen him projected at 13th!!!!! That's insane - Bean and Fabbro are ahead of him!!
- Brooks_Light



Fabbro is 17th. Bean 13th.

Who is your source?

Sorry 20 and 21.
http://www.isshockey.com/iss-top-30/
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Feb 27 @ 10:04 PM ET
You at least provided me with the link.
- CubanBuffet

lol
Brooks_Light
Joined: 08.13.2015

Feb 27 @ 10:04 PM ET
Mostly it will take him 5 years to be NHL ready
- VANTEL


What about Chychrun, Sergachev, Fabbro, Juolevi how far off are they?
Brooks_Light
Joined: 08.13.2015

Feb 27 @ 10:06 PM ET
Fabbro is 17th. Bean 13th.

Who is your source?

- Scooby_Doo


Not a reliable one apparently
classic321
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 07.04.2012

Feb 27 @ 10:10 PM ET


Go I hope these John's rumors out of Dallas aren't true.

Get someone younger than 24 years old.

Guy is right at the end of RFA status.



VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 27 @ 10:20 PM ET
Go I hope these John's rumors out of Dallas aren't true.

Get someone younger than 24 years old.

Guy is right at the end of RFA status.

- classic321

Why? A big RHD ready to make the jump to the NHL
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28  Next