Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Vancouver Canucks Trade Deadline: Hamhuis Stays, Adam Cracknell to Edmonton
Author Message
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Feb 29 @ 11:15 PM ET
Luongo was under contract and the same thing actually happened as today,,, Gillis failed to move him at the TDL. Horrible example....
- boonerbuck


Really?

Pretty sure Lu got traded.....

Don't let your Gillis hate get it the way.
Whiskey-Tango
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Classification: Bipolar-Tanker, QC
Joined: 12.10.2011

Feb 29 @ 11:15 PM ET
I'm honestly surprised that Hamhuis wouldn't waive for any of the California teams. They have decent playoff projections and are relatively close to Vancouver.
- flamminghead


He would have/did.
Basically said any Western conference contender team if the "deal made sense".
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Feb 29 @ 11:16 PM ET
Would it?? After a day like today, I expect a firing. I have never seen a team fail to trade an asset like hamhuis at the deadline when they're so clearly out of the playoff race. It is absolutely inexcusable and a day like this will define this franchise for the next few years because they have lost the fans.

Unless this team makes a massive splash and signs stamkos this off season, there will be no less than 4000 empty seats every game next year.

- hertzman


Fire Benning for not taking that 3rd?
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Feb 29 @ 11:16 PM ET
He's a good fit with all of that youth. Dale will likely overpay but could very well get a Cup out of the deal.
- golfingsince

This is a maybe I think. Gudbranson and Ekblad both need contracts don't they?
It would be a great fit for the pu$sycats though
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 29 @ 11:17 PM ET
The Vancouver Canucks?
- golfingsince



Well they are a team that likes to do nothing , so bringing back an old Dman that doesn't hit and doesn't score seems right up their alley.

golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Feb 29 @ 11:17 PM ET
Biggest losers a day where hardly any trades were made.... biggest losers because Benning didnt take the 3rd he was offered? Oh well.. so be it. I'm disappointed but this team isnt screed because they missed out on a 3rd.

No one wanted the players on "The List".

- boonerbuck


Do you really think he was only offered a 3rd?

Has the fisherman turned into a fish ?
hillbillydeluxe
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I didn't read it , BC
Joined: 09.21.2013

Feb 29 @ 11:19 PM ET
As I said I wished Hamhuis came out and said I'm staying it could have ended the BS.

Now the GM looks incompetent , it lets down the hopes of a fan base and we aren't the talk of the NHL for all the wrong reasons.


He didn't have to go anywhere . We don't have to sign him. I wish him luck with his new team

- VANTEL


as long as we, the blog, are speculating, what if Hamhuis said yes, he'd waive, and then later changed his mind? Just got cold feet and JB, rather than throw him under the bus to the media, just said it didn't work out...
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Feb 29 @ 11:19 PM ET
This is a maybe I think. Gudbranson and Ekblad both need contracts don't they?
It would be a great fit for the pu$sycats though

- neem55


Ekblad still has a year left. Gudbranson needs a new deal I think. I'm pretty sure they have plenty of space however. Barkov will need a new deal soon too.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Feb 29 @ 11:19 PM ET
Really?

Pretty sure Lu got traded.....

Don't let your Gillis hate get it the way.

- golfingsince


He failed to move him at the trade deadline. Look it up.
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Feb 29 @ 11:20 PM ET
Ekblad still has a year left. Gudbranson needs a new deal I think. I'm pretty sure they have plenty of space however. Barkov will need a new deal soon too.
- golfingsince

He got one, kicks in next year 5.9
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Feb 29 @ 11:20 PM ET
as long as we, the blog, are speculating, what if Hamhuis said yes, he'd waive, and then later changed his mind? Just got cold feet and JB, rather than throw him under the bus to the media, just said it didn't work out...
- hillbillydeluxe


JB is an upgrade on MG. That's all i'll say.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Feb 29 @ 11:21 PM ET
He failed to move him at the trade deadline. Look it up.
- boonerbuck


Oh, I remember.

I also remember Lu having an albatross of a contract, not an expiring deal. He still managed to secure 2 assets for him.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Feb 29 @ 11:21 PM ET
Do you really think he was only offered a 3rd?

Has the fisherman turned into a fish ?

- golfingsince


....and you know otherwise?

Stop trolling me princess. There are people your age and gender in here to play with.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Feb 29 @ 11:21 PM ET
He got one, kicks in next year 5.9
- neem55


Barkov? I missed that. how long?
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 09.26.2010

Feb 29 @ 11:22 PM ET
....and you know otherwise?

Stop trolling me princess. There are people your age and gender in here to play with.

- boonerbuck

I've missed you the most
mauryballstein
Vancouver Canucks
Location: vancouver, BC
Joined: 06.12.2015

Feb 29 @ 11:22 PM ET
The main problem with Hamhuis not being traded was that I was gona cheer for the team he went to. Ill go with the Preds in the west and caps in the east.
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Feb 29 @ 11:23 PM ET
I wish Burkie was back.
belcherbd
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Nanaimo
Joined: 02.16.2007

Feb 29 @ 11:23 PM ET
Latest reports earlier this month were that it could decrease by as much as 4 million(probably not that much, but I'd be shocked if it increases based on that).
- Nucker101

I believe the report of the cap going up was based off of the players raising the escrow a further 5%.

I could be wrong but I believe it is already at 16% so in other words the players might be forced to give up a fifth of their contracts in order for the cap to rise. At some point if this continues I imagine we will see another labour dispute.
hertzman
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 01.18.2006

Feb 29 @ 11:23 PM ET
Biggest losers a day where hardly any trades were made.... biggest losers because Benning didnt take the 3rd he was offered? Oh well.. so be it. I'm disappointed but this team isnt screwed because they missed out on a 3rd.

No one wanted the players on "The List".

- boonerbuck


Missed out on a 3rd? When has the top rental defenseman available EVER go for just a 3rd at the deadline? This is further proving that our gm is incompetent.
RoloTahmasee
Joined: 07.24.2009

Feb 29 @ 11:23 PM ET
Meh, F Dan Hamhuis. Could have helped make the team better then come back in the off season. I hope he's shown the door and gets nothing besides a lowball offer from the Canucks
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Feb 29 @ 11:23 PM ET
Oh, I remember.

I also remember Lu having an albatross of a contract, not an expiring deal. He still managed to secure 2 assets for him.

- golfingsince


So agree that it was totally different at the same time a you argue that it's exactly the same. OK
mauryballstein
Vancouver Canucks
Location: vancouver, BC
Joined: 06.12.2015

Feb 29 @ 11:23 PM ET
Barkov? I missed that. how long?
- golfingsince

6 or 7 cant remember
neem55
Vancouver Canucks
Joined: 02.02.2012

Feb 29 @ 11:23 PM ET
Barkov? I missed that. how long?
- golfingsince

4 years...? maybe 5. Either way, that will be a value contract by the end. Maybe even next year.
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Feb 29 @ 11:24 PM ET
....and you know otherwise?

Stop trolling me princess. There are people your age and gender in here to play with.

- boonerbuck


There are several reports out there that he was offered a decent deal, by respected hockey insiders. I guess it's easier to just accept what Benning says though.
boonerbuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Not Quesnel, BC
Joined: 10.11.2005

Feb 29 @ 11:24 PM ET
I've missed you the most
- Nucker101


I was hoping you'd come back long long ago nucker.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41  Next